S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
5935
2025-2026 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
March 4, 2025
___________
Introduced by Sen. ADDABBO -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Racing, Gaming and Wager-
ing
AN ACT to amend the racing, pari-mutuel wagering and breeding law, in
relation to prohibiting online sweepstakes games and revenue from
illegal markets
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Legislative purpose. It is the purpose of this legislation
to prohibit certain persons from operating, conducting, or promoting
certain online sweepstakes games or supporting the operation, conduct-
ing, or promotion of certain online sweepstakes games. This legislation
requires the New York state gaming commission and/or the New York state
attorney general to deny a person from commencing or continuing oper-
ations if such person or an affiliate of such person knowingly accepts
revenue that is directly or indirectly derived from online sweepstakes
games, and enforce penalties on behalf of any findings of prohibited
engagement.
§ 2. The racing, pari-mutuel wagering and breeding law is amended by
adding a new section 912 to read as follows:
§ 912. PROHIBITION OF ONLINE SWEEPSTAKES GAMES AND REVENUE FROM ILLE-
GAL MARKETS. 1. DEFINITIONS. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "ONLINE
SWEEPSTAKES GAME" SHALL MEAN ANY GAME, CONTEST, OR PROMOTION THAT IS
AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET AND/OR ACCESSIBLE ON A MOBILE PHONE, COMPUTER
TERMINAL, OR SIMILAR ACCESS DEVICE, THAT UTILIZES A DUAL-CURRENCY SYSTEM
OF PAYMENT ALLOWING THE PLAYER TO EXCHANGE THE CURRENCY FOR ANY PRIZE,
AWARD, CASH OR CASH EQUIVALENTS, OR ANY CHANCE TO WIN ANY PRICE, AWARD,
CASH OR CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND SIMULATES CASINO-STYLE GAMING, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SLOT MACHINES, VIDEO POKER, TABLE GAMES INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO BLACKJACK, ROULETTE, CRAPS, AND POKER, LOTTERY GAMES
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DRAW GAMES, INSTANT WIN GAMES, KENO, AND
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD10101-01-5
S. 5935 2
BINGO, AND SPORTS WAGERING. A SWEEPSTAKES GAME SHALL NOT INCLUDE A GAME
WHICH DOES NOT AWARD CASH PRIZES OR CASH EQUIVALENTS.
2. PROHIBITION. (A) IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY APPLICANT, LICENSED
ENTITY, GAMING EMPLOYEE, KEY EMPLOYEE, INDIVIDUAL INVESTOR OR INVESTMENT
FIRM, BOARD MEMBER, OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY TO OPERATE, CONDUCT,
OR PROMOTE SWEEPSTAKES GAMES WITHIN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
(B) IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY APPLICANT, LICENSED ENTITY, FINANCIAL
INSTITUTION, PAYMENT PROCESSOR, GEOLOCATION PROVIDER, GAMING CONTENT
SUPPLIER, PLATFORM PROVIDER, OR MEDIA AFFILIATE TO SUPPORT THE OPERA-
TION, CONDUCT, OR PROMOTION OF SWEEPSTAKES GAMES WITHIN THE STATE OF NEW
YORK.
3. PENALTIES. ANY APPLICANT, LICENSED ENTITY, GAMING EMPLOYEE, KEY
EMPLOYEE, INDIVIDUAL INVESTOR OR INVESTMENT FIRM, BOARD MEMBER, OR ANY
OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOUND IN VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE
SUBJECT TO A FINE OF NOT LESS THAN TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS AND NOT MORE
THAN ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR EACH VIOLATION AND SHALL BE
SUBJECT TO THE LOSS OF A GAMING LICENSE AND/OR BE INELIGIBLE FOR A
GAMING LICENSE.
4. ENFORCEMENT. (A) THE STATE GAMING COMMISSION, THE STATE POLICE, OR
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION.
(B) THE STATE GAMING COMMISSION MAY CONDUCT INVESTIGATIONS, HOLD HEAR-
INGS, ISSUE CEASE AND DESIST LETTERS, AND ISSUE SUBPOENAS TO ENSURE
COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION.
§ 3. This act shall take effect immediately.
Allow people their freedoms, and put time and energy into more important government tasks. Dictating to New Yorkers what games they can play on their phones is an abuse of power and is an insult to New Yorkers freedoms. People have to pay taxes on any winnings and can benefit the state.
This bill is blatantly sponsored by the casino industry that wishes to further corner a market where they cannot compete because they offer worse experiences to the consumer. Sweeps casinos provide the consumer with ways to play 100% for free if they wish, while regular casinos just want to take all your money. I think it is worth noting that the senator who proposed this bill received a donation of $51k from the Saratoga Casino Hotel, a clear conflict of interest when it comes to deciding if their competition should be banned from operating in the state. This bill strips NY residents of the right to decide where to get their entertainment from and should not be voted through.