S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
6684
2025-2026 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
March 19, 2025
___________
Introduced by Sen. CLEARE -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Investigations and Govern-
ment Operations
AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to preserve the right to
a jury trial for certain actions
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subdivision 9 of section 297 of the executive law, as
amended by chapter 140 of the laws of 2022, is amended to read as
follows:
9. Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an unlawful discriminatory
practice shall have a cause of action in any court of appropriate juris-
diction for damages, including, in cases of employment discrimination
related to private employers and housing discrimination only, punitive
damages, and such other remedies as may be appropriate, including any
civil fines and penalties provided in subdivision four of this section,
unless such person had filed a complaint hereunder or with any local
commission on human rights, or with the superintendent pursuant to the
provisions of section two hundred ninety-six-a of this article, provided
that, where the division has dismissed such complaint on the grounds of
administrative convenience, on the grounds of untimeliness, or on the
grounds that the election of remedies is annulled, such person shall
maintain all rights to bring suit as if no complaint had been filed with
the division. At any time prior to a hearing before a hearing examiner,
a person who has a complaint pending at the division may request that
the division dismiss the complaint and annul [his or her] THEIR election
of remedies so that the human rights law claim may be pursued in court,
and the division may, upon such request, dismiss the complaint on the
grounds that such person's election of an administrative remedy is
annulled. Notwithstanding subdivision (a) of section two hundred four of
the civil practice law and rules, if a complaint is so annulled by the
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD11084-01-5
S. 6684 2
division, upon the request of the party bringing such complaint before
the division, such party's rights to bring such cause of action before a
court of appropriate jurisdiction shall be limited by the statute of
limitations in effect in such court at the time the complaint was
initially filed with the division. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION
OF LAW TO THE CONTRARY, WHEN A PERSON COMMENCES AN ACTION PURSUANT TO
THIS SUBDIVISION OR PURSUANT TO A LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, AND SUCH
ACTION INCLUDES A DEMAND FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF, SUCH PERSON SHALL NEVER-
THELESS RETAIN THE RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL. Any party to a housing
discrimination complaint shall have the right within twenty days follow-
ing a determination of probable cause pursuant to subdivision two of
this section to elect to have an action commenced in a civil court, and
an attorney representing the division of human rights will be appointed
to present the complaint in court, or, with the consent of the division,
the case may be presented by complainant's attorney. A complaint filed
by the equal employment opportunity commission to comply with the
requirements of 42 USC 2000e-5(c) and 42 USC 12117(a) and 29 USC 633(b)
shall not constitute the filing of a complaint within the meaning of
this subdivision. No person who has initiated any action in a court of
competent jurisdiction or who has an action pending before any adminis-
trative agency under any other law of the state based upon an act which
would be an unlawful discriminatory practice under this article, may
file a complaint with respect to the same grievance under this section
or under section two hundred ninety-six-a of this article. In cases of
housing discrimination only, a person whose complaint has been dismissed
by the division after investigation for lack of jurisdiction or lack of
probable cause may file the same cause of action in a court of appropri-
ate jurisdiction pursuant to this section, unless judicial review of
such dismissal has been sought pursuant to section two hundred ninety-
eight of this article. The attorney general shall have the power to
commence an action or proceeding in the supreme court of the state of
New York, if, upon information or belief, the attorney general is of the
opinion that an employer has been, is, or is about to violate the
provisions regarding unlawful discriminatory retaliation pursuant to
subdivision seven of section two hundred ninety-six of this article.
Nothing in this section shall in any way limit rights or remedies which
are otherwise available under law to the attorney general or any other
person authorized to bring an action under this section.
§ 2. This act shall take effect immediately.