Senate Bill S7491B

2025-2026 Legislative Session

Relates to the statute of limitations for certain deed theft actions, revives such actions otherwise barred by the existing statute of limitations, and grants trial preference to such actions

download bill text pdf

Current Bill Status - Passed Senate

Introduced
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
Delivered to Governor
Signed By Governor

Please enter your contact information

First Name

Last Name

Email Address

A valid email address is required.

Home address is used to determine the senate district in which you reside. Your support or opposition to this bill is then shared immediately with the senator who represents you.

Optional services from the NY State Senate:

Create an account. An account allows you to officially support or oppose key legislation, sign petitions with a single click, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Include a custom message for your Senator? (Optional)

Enter a message to your senator. Many New Yorkers use this to share the reasoning behind their support or opposition to the bill. Others might share a personal anecdote about how the bill would affect them or people they care about.

Actions

View Actions

Date of Action	Assembly Actions - Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Jun 03, 2026	delivered to assembly passed senate ordered to third reading cal.1624 committee discharged and committed to rules
May 12, 2026	print number 7491b
May 12, 2026	amend and recommit to judiciary
Jan 07, 2026	referred to judiciary
Jun 13, 2025	committed to rules
Jun 09, 2025	amended on third reading 7491a
May 22, 2025	advanced to third reading
May 21, 2025	2nd report cal.
May 20, 2025	1st report cal.1207
Apr 17, 2025	referred to judiciary

Votes

- Jun 3, 2026 - Floor Vote
  S7491B
  
  Aye
  
  55
  
  Nay
  
  6
  
  Absent
  
  1
  
  Excused
  
  1
  
  Abstained
  
  0
  - - Floor Vote: Jun 3, 2026
      
      aye (55)
      
      Addabbo Jr.
      
      Ashby
      
      Bailey
      
      Baskin
      
      Bottcher
      
      Brisport
      
      Brouk
      
      Bynoe
      
      Chan
      
      Cleare
      
      Comrie
      
      Fahy
      
      Fernandez
      
      Gallivan
      
      Gianaris
      
      Gonzalez
      
      Gounardes
      
      Griffo
      
      Harckham
      
      Helming
      
      Hinchey
      
      Jackson
      
      Kavanagh
      
      Krueger
      
      Lanza
      
      Liu
      
      Martinez
      
      Mattera
      
      May
      
      Mayer
      
      Murray
      
      Myrie
      
      O'Mara
      
      Oberacker
      
      Ortt
      
      Palumbo
      
      Persaud
      
      Ramos
      
      Rivera
      
      Rolison
      
      Ryan
      
      Salazar
      
      Sanders Jr.
      
      Scarcella-Spanton
      
      Sepúlveda
      
      Serrano
      
      Skoufis
      
      Stavisky
      
      Stec
      
      Stewart-Cousins
      
      Sutton
      
      Tedisco
      
      Webb
      
      Weber
      
      Zellner
      
      nay (6)
      
      Borrello
      
      Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick
      
      Martins
      
      Rhoads
      
      Walczyk
      
      Weik
      
      absent (1)
      
      Parker
      
      excused (1)
      
      Cooney
      
      The following Member(s) participated via videoconferencing: Stavisky Krueger Brouk
  May 20, 2025 - Judiciary Committee Vote
  S7491B
  
  Aye
  
  13
  
  Nay
  
  0
  
  Aye with Reservations
  
  5
  
  Absent
  
  0
  
  Excused
  
  1
  
  Abstained
  
  0
  - - Judiciary Committee Vote: May 20, 2025
      
      aye (13)
      
      Bailey
      
      Cooney
      
      Gounardes
      
      Hoylman-Sigal
      
      Liu
      
      Mayer
      
      Myrie
      
      Parker
      
      Ramos
      
      Ryan
      
      Sepúlveda
      
      Skoufis
      
      Stavisky
      
      aye wr (5)
      
      Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick
      
      Lanza
      
      O'Mara
      
      Palumbo
      
      Rhoads
      
      excused (1)
      
      Martins

Bill Amendments

Original

B (Active)

2025-S7491 - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A8222
Law Section:: Civil Practice Law and Rules
Laws Affected:: Add §214-k, amd R3403, CPLR; add §219-f, Judy L

2025-S7491 - Summary

Relates to the statute of limitations for certain deed theft actions; revives such actions otherwise barred by the existing statute of limitations and states who may bring such actions; grants trial preference to such actions; directs the chief administrator of the courts to promulgate rules for the timely adjudication of certain revived actions.

2025-S7491 - Sponsor Memo

                                 
BILL NUMBER: S7491

SPONSOR: BRISPORT
 
TITLE OF BILL:

An act to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to the
statute of limitations for civil actions related to certain deed theft
actions, reviving such actions otherwise barred by the existing statute
of limitations and granting trial preference to such actions; and to
amend the judiciary law, in relation to directing the chief administra-
tor of the courts to promulgate rules for the timely adjudication of
certain revived actions

 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section one amends the civil practice law and rules by adding a new 2
section 214-k.

Section two amends paragraph 7 of subdivision (a) of rule 3403 of the
civil practice law and rules, to reference section 214-k.

Section three amends the judiciary law is amended by adding a new
section 219-f.

Section four states that the provisions of this act shall be severable,
and that if any part of this act shall be adjudged by any court to be
invalid, such judgment shall not invalidate the remainder of the law.

Section five sets forth the effective date.

 
JUSTIFICATION:

"Deed theft" is the tactic of using fraudulent or misleading tactics to
take the title, or deed, to another person's home without the homeown-
er's knowledge or approval. As real estate capital has flooded into
rapidly gentrifying neighborhoods of New York, this tactic has been
increasingly used to separate elderly homeowners and homeowners of
color---especially Black and Brown homeowners---from their homes.

It has recently become apparent that many clear cases of deed theft,
including cases with underlying acts of fraud that took place in the
wake of the 2008 financial crisis, have still not been appropriately
resolved. In some of these cases, the New York State Attorney General
has declined to become involved, citing the statute of limitations as an
impediment to enforcement.

This legislation would simply create a one-year window for the revival
of otherwise time-barred claims for deed theft. With this new window,
individuals and law enforcement agencies will have the ability to pursue
appropriate cases of deed theft.

 
PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

New bill.

 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:

None.

 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect immediately; provided, however, that section
three of this act shall take effect three months after this act shall
have become a law.

2025-S7491 - Bill Text download pdf

                             
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                   7491
 
                        2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                              April 17, 2025
                                ___________
 
 Introduced  by Sen. BRISPORT -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
   printed to be committed to the Committee on Judiciary
 
 AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules,  in  relation  to  the
   statute of limitations for civil actions related to certain deed theft
   actions,  reviving such actions otherwise barred by the existing stat-
   ute of limitations and granting trial preference to such actions;  and
   to  amend the judiciary law, in relation to directing the chief admin-
   istrator of the courts to promulgate rules for the timely adjudication
   of certain revived actions
 
   THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section 1. The civil practice law and rules is amended by adding a new
 section 214-k to read as follows:
   §  214-K. CERTAIN DEED THEFT ACTIONS. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY PROVISION OF
 LAW WHICH IMPOSES A  PERIOD  OF  LIMITATION  TO  THE  CONTRARY  AND  THE
 PROVISIONS  OF  ANY  OTHER  LAW  PERTAINING TO THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
 CLAIM OR A NOTICE OF INTENTION TO FILE A CLAIM AS A CONDITION  PRECEDENT
 TO COMMENCEMENT OF AN ACTION OR SPECIAL PROCEEDING, EVERY CIVIL CLAIM OR
 CAUSE  OF ACTION BROUGHT AGAINST ANY PARTY ALLEGING THE THEFT, FRAUD, OR
 DECEIT IN OBTAINING THE TITLE TO A RESIDENTIAL DWELLING, WHICH IS BARRED
 AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION BECAUSE THE  APPLICABLE  PERIOD
 OF  LIMITATION  HAS  EXPIRED,  AND/OR THE PLAINTIFF PREVIOUSLY FAILED TO
 FILE A NOTICE OF CLAIM OR A NOTICE OF INTENTION  TO  FILE  A  CLAIM,  IS
 HEREBY REVIVED, AND ACTION THEREON MAY BE COMMENCED NOT EARLIER THAN SIX
 MONTHS  AFTER,  AND  NOT  LATER  THAN  ONE YEAR AND SIX MONTHS AFTER THE
 EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION. IN ANY SUCH CLAIM OR  ACTION,  DISMISSAL
 OF A PREVIOUS ACTION, ORDERED BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION,
 ON GROUNDS THAT SUCH PREVIOUS ACTION WAS TIME BARRED, AND/OR FOR FAILURE
 OF  A PARTY TO FILE A NOTICE OF CLAIM OR A NOTICE OF INTENTION TO FILE A
 CLAIM, SHALL NOT BE GROUNDS FOR DISMISSAL OF A REVIVAL  ACTION  PURSUANT
 TO THIS SECTION.
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                            LBD11599-01-5

 S. 7491                             2
 
   § 2. Paragraph 7 of subdivision (a) of rule 3403 of the civil practice
 law and rules, as amended by chapter 203 of the laws of 2022, is amended
 to read as follows:
   7.  any  action which has been revived pursuant to section two hundred
 fourteen-g [or], two hundred fourteen-j, OR TWO  HUNDRED  FOURTEEN-K  of
 this chapter.
   §  3.  The  judiciary  law is amended by adding a new section 219-f to
 read as follows:
   § 219-F. RULES REVIVING CERTAIN ACTIONS; DEED THEFT. THE CHIEF  ADMIN-
 ISTRATOR  OF  THE  COURTS  SHALL PROMULGATE RULES FOR THE TIMELY ADJUDI-
 CATION OF REVIVED ACTIONS BROUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION TWO HUNDRED  FOUR-
 TEEN-K OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES.
   § 4. The provisions of this act shall be severable, and if any clause,
 sentence,  paragraph,  subdivision or part of this act shall be adjudged
 by any court of competent jurisdiction  to  be  invalid,  such  judgment
 shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall
 be  confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, subdi-
 vision or part thereof directly involved in  the  controversy  in  which
 such judgment shall have been rendered.
   §  5.  This act shall take effect immediately; provided, however, that
 section three of this act shall take effect three months after this  act
 shall have become a law.

co-Sponsors

View additional co-sponsors

2025-S7491A - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A8222
Law Section:: Civil Practice Law and Rules
Laws Affected:: Add §214-k, amd R3403, CPLR; add §219-f, Judy L

2025-S7491A - Summary

2025-S7491A - Sponsor Memo

                                 
BILL NUMBER: S7491A

SPONSOR: BRISPORT
 
TITLE OF BILL:

An act to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to the
statute of limitations for civil actions related to certain deed theft
actions, reviving such actions otherwise barred by the existing statute
of limitations and granting trial preference to such actions; and to
amend the judiciary law, in relation to directing the chief administra-
tor of the courts to promulgate rules for the timely adjudication of
certain revived actions

 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section one amends the civil practice law and rules by adding a new 2
section 214-k.

Section two amends paragraph 7 of subdivision (a) of rule 3403 of the
civil practice law and rules, to reference section 214-k.

Section three amends the judiciary law is amended by adding a new
section 219-f.

Section four states that the provisions of this act shall be severable,
and that if any part of this act shall be adjudged by any court to be
invalid, such judgment shall not invalidate the remainder of the law.

Section five sets forth the effective date.

 
JUSTIFICATION:

"Deed theft" is the tactic of using fraudulent or misleading tactics to
take the title, or deed, to another person's home without the homeown-
er's knowledge or approval. As real estate capital has flooded into
rapidly gentrifying neighborhoods of New York, this tactic has been
increasingly used to separate elderly homeowners and homeowners of
color---especially Black and Brown homeowners---from their homes.

It has recently become apparent that many clear cases of deed theft,
including cases with underlying acts of fraud that took place in the
wake of the 2008 financial crisis, have still not been appropriately
resolved. In some of these cases, the New York State Attorney General
has declined to become involved, citing the statute of limitations as an
impediment to enforcement.

This legislation would simply create a one-year window for the revival
of otherwise time-barred claims for deed theft. With this new window,
individuals and law enforcement agencies will have the ability to pursue
appropriate cases of deed theft.

 
PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

New bill.

 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:

None.

 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect immediately; provided, however, that section
three of this act shall take effect three months after this act shall
have become a law.

2025-S7491A - Bill Text download pdf

                             
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                  7491--A
     Cal. No. 1207
 
                        2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                              April 17, 2025
                                ___________
 
 Introduced  by Sen. BRISPORT -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
   printed to be committed to the  Committee  on  Judiciary  --  reported
   favorably  from  said  committee,  ordered to first and second report,
   ordered to a third reading, amended and ordered  reprinted,  retaining
   its place in the order of third reading

 AN  ACT  to  amend  the civil practice law and rules, in relation to the
   statute of limitations for civil actions related to certain deed theft
   actions, reviving such actions otherwise barred by the existing  stat-
   ute  of limitations and granting trial preference to such actions; and
   to amend the judiciary law, in relation to directing the chief  admin-
   istrator of the courts to promulgate rules for the timely adjudication
   of certain revived actions
 
   THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section 1. The civil practice law and rules is amended by adding a new
 section 214-k to read as follows:
   § 214-K. CERTAIN DEED THEFT ACTIONS. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY PROVISION  OF
 LAW  WHICH  IMPOSES  A PERIOD OF LIMITATION TO THE CONTRARY, EVERY CIVIL
 CLAIM OR CAUSE OF ACTION BROUGHT AGAINST ANY PARTY ALLEGING FRAUD, FRAU-
 DULENT INDUCEMENT, OR  FRAUDULENT  MISREPRESENTATION  IN  OBTAINING  THE
 TITLE  TO  A  RESIDENTIAL DWELLING, EVERY CIVIL CLAIM OR CAUSE OF ACTION
 ALLEGING A VIOLATION OF SECTION THREE HUNDRED FORTY-NINE OF THE  GENERAL
 BUSINESS  LAW  OR  SECTION TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE-A OF THE REAL PROPERTY
 LAW THAT ARISE FROM FRAUD, FRAUDULENT INDUCEMENT, OR FRAUDULENT  MISREP-
 RESENTATION  IN OBTAINING THE TITLE TO A RESIDENTIAL DWELLING, AND EVERY
 CIVIL CLAIM OR CAUSE OF ACTION FOR LEGAL  MALPRACTICE  RELATED  TO  SUCH
 ALLEGATIONS,  WHICH  IS  BARRED AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION
 BECAUSE THE APPLICABLE PERIOD  OF  LIMITATION  HAS  EXPIRED,  IS  HEREBY
 REVIVED, AND ACTION THEREON MAY BE COMMENCED NOT EARLIER THAN SIX MONTHS
 AFTER,  AND  NOT  LATER THAN ONE YEAR AND SIX MONTHS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE
 DATE OF THIS SECTION. IN ANY SUCH CLAIM OR ACTION, DISMISSAL OF A PREVI-
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.

                                                            LBD11599-02-5
 S. 7491--A                          2
 
 OUS ACTION ORDERED BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION ON  GROUNDS
 THAT SUCH PREVIOUS ACTION WAS TIME BARRED, OR DISMISSAL OF SUCH PREVIOUS
 ACTION  PURSUANT  TO RULE THIRTY-TWO HUNDRED SIXTEEN OF THIS CHAPTER FOR
 FAILURE  TO  PROSECUTE,  SHALL NOT BE GROUNDS FOR DISMISSAL OF A REVIVAL
 ACTION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION.
   § 2. Paragraph 7 of subdivision (a) of rule 3403 of the civil practice
 law and rules, as amended by chapter 203 of the laws of 2022, is amended
 to read as follows:
   7. any action which has been revived pursuant to section  two  hundred
 fourteen-g  [or],  two  hundred fourteen-j, OR TWO HUNDRED FOURTEEN-K of
 this chapter.
   § 3. The judiciary law is amended by adding a  new  section  219-f  to
 read as follows:
   §  219-F. RULES REVIVING CERTAIN ACTIONS; DEED THEFT. THE CHIEF ADMIN-
 ISTRATOR OF THE COURTS SHALL PROMULGATE RULES  FOR  THE  TIMELY  ADJUDI-
 CATION  OF REVIVED ACTIONS BROUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION TWO HUNDRED FOUR-
 TEEN-K OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES.
   § 4. The provisions of this act shall be severable, and if any clause,
 sentence, paragraph, subdivision or part of this act shall  be  adjudged
 by  any  court  of  competent  jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment
 shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall
 be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph,  subdi-
 vision  or  part  thereof  directly involved in the controversy in which
 such judgment shall have been rendered.
   § 5. This act shall take effect immediately; provided,  however,  that
 section  three of this act shall take effect three months after this act
 shall have become a law.

co-Sponsors

View additional co-sponsors

2025-S7491B (ACTIVE) - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A8222
Law Section:: Civil Practice Law and Rules
Laws Affected:: Add §214-k, amd R3403, CPLR; add §219-f, Judy L

2025-S7491B (ACTIVE) - Summary

2025-S7491B (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

                                 
BILL NUMBER: S7491B

SPONSOR: BRISPORT
 
TITLE OF BILL:

An act to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to the
statute of limitations for civil actions related to certain deed theft
actions, reviving such actions otherwise barred by the existing statute
of limitations and granting trial preference to such actions; and to
amend the judiciary law, in relation to directing the chief administra-
tor of the courts to promulgate rules for the timely adjudication of
certain revived actions

 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section one amends the civil practice law and rules by adding a new
section 214-k, allowing for a time period in which otherwise time-barred
deed theft claims may be asserted.

Section two amends paragraph 7 of subdivision (a) of rule 3403 of the
civil practice law and rules, to reference section 214-k.

Section three amends the judiciary law by adding a new section 219-f, so

that the chief administrator of the courts can promulgate rules for the
implementation of this law.

Section four states that the provisions of this act shall be severable,
and that if any part of this act shall be adjudged by any court to be
invalid, such judgment shall not invalidate the remainder of the law.

Section five sets forth the effective date.

 
JUSTIFICATION:

"Deed theft" is the tactic of using fraudulent or misleading tactics to
take the title, or deed, to another person's home without the homeown-
er's knowledge or approval. As real estate capital has flooded into
rapidly gentrifying neighborhoods of New York, this tactic has been
increasingly used to separate elderly homeowners and homeowners of
color-especially Black and Brown homeowners-from their homes.

It has recently become apparent that many clear cases of deed theft,
including cases with underlying acts of fraud that took place in the
wake of the 2008 financial crisis, have still not been appropriately
resolved. In some of these cases, the New York State Attorney General
has declined to become involved, citing the statute of limitations as an
impediment to enforcement.

This legislation would simply create a one-year window for the revival
of otherwise time-barred claims for deed theft. With this new window,
individuals and law enforcement agencies will have the ability to pursue
appropriate cases of deed theft.

 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

New bill.

 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

None.

 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect immediately; provided, however, that section
three of this act shall take effect three months after this act shall
have become a law.

2025-S7491B (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

                             
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                  7491--B
 
                        2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                              April 17, 2025
                                ___________
 
 Introduced  by  Sens.  BRISPORT, BASKIN, CLEARE, COMRIE, FAHY, GONZALEZ,
   HARCKHAM, KAVANAGH, LIU, MYRIE, SALAZAR, SANDERS,  SEPULVEDA,  SKOUFIS
   -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to
   the  Committee on Judiciary -- reported favorably from said committee,
   ordered to first and  second  report,  ordered  to  a  third  reading,
   amended  and  ordered  reprinted,  retaining its place in the order of
   third reading -- recommitted to the Committee on Judiciary in  accord-
   ance with Senate Rule 6, sec. 8 -- committee discharged, bill amended,
   ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee
 
 AN  ACT  to  amend  the civil practice law and rules, in relation to the
   statute of limitations for civil actions related to certain deed theft
   actions, reviving such actions otherwise barred by the existing  stat-
   ute  of limitations and granting trial preference to such actions; and
   to amend the judiciary law, in relation to directing the chief  admin-
   istrator of the courts to promulgate rules for the timely adjudication
   of certain revived actions
 
   THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

   Section 1. The civil practice law and rules is amended by adding a new
 section 214-k to read as follows:
   § 214-K. CERTAIN DEED THEFT ACTIONS. 1. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY  PROVISION
 OF LAW WHICH IMPOSES A PERIOD OF LIMITATION TO THE CONTRARY, EVERY CIVIL
 CLAIM OR CAUSE OF ACTION BROUGHT AGAINST ANY PARTY ALLEGING FRAUD, FRAU-
 DULENT  INDUCEMENT,  OR  FRAUDULENT  MISREPRESENTATION  IN OBTAINING THE
 TITLE TO A RESIDENTIAL DWELLING, EVERY CIVIL CLAIM OR  CAUSE  OF  ACTION
 ALLEGING  A VIOLATION OF SECTION THREE HUNDRED FORTY-NINE OF THE GENERAL
 BUSINESS LAW OR SECTION TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE-A OF  THE  REAL  PROPERTY
 LAW  THAT ARISE FROM FRAUD, FRAUDULENT INDUCEMENT, OR FRAUDULENT MISREP-
 RESENTATION IN OBTAINING THE TITLE TO A RESIDENTIAL DWELLING, AND  EVERY
 CIVIL  CLAIM  OR  CAUSE  OF ACTION FOR LEGAL MALPRACTICE RELATED TO SUCH
 ALLEGATIONS, ACCRUING ON OR AFTER JANUARY FIRST, TWO THOUSAND, WHICH  IS
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                            LBD11599-06-6

 S. 7491--B                          2
 
 BARRED  AS  OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION BECAUSE THE APPLICABLE
 PERIOD OF LIMITATION HAS EXPIRED, IS HEREBY REVIVED, AND ACTION  THEREON
 MAY  BE  COMMENCED NOT EARLIER THAN SIX MONTHS AFTER, AND NOT LATER THAN
 ONE YEAR AND SIX MONTHS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION. IN ANY
 SUCH  CLAIM OR ACTION, DISMISSAL OF A PREVIOUS ACTION ORDERED BEFORE THE
 EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION ON GROUNDS THAT SUCH PREVIOUS ACTION  WAS
 TIME BARRED, OR DISMISSAL OF SUCH PREVIOUS ACTION PURSUANT TO RULE THIR-
 TY-TWO  HUNDRED  SIXTEEN OF THIS CHAPTER FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, SHALL
 NOT BE GROUNDS FOR DISMISSAL  OF  A  REVIVAL  ACTION  PURSUANT  TO  THIS
 SECTION.
   2.  CLAIMS  THAT ARE REVIVED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION SHALL BE LIMITED
 TO THOSE ASSERTED BY: (A) NATURAL PERSONS WHO RESIDED AT THE PROPERTY AT
 ISSUE AS THEIR PRIMARY RESIDENCE FOR  AT  LEAST  TWO  CONSECUTIVE  YEARS
 IMMEDIATELY  PRIOR TO THE DEED THEFT; (B) THE ESTATES OF NATURAL PERSONS
 WHO RESIDED AT THE PROPERTY AT ISSUE AS THEIR PRIMARY RESIDENCE  FOR  AT
 LEAST TWO CONSECUTIVE YEARS IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO THE DEED THEFT; AND (C)
 ENTITIES  WHERE AT LEAST ONE OWNER OF THE ENTITY RESIDED AT THE PROPERTY
 AT ISSUE AS THEIR PRIMARY RESIDENCE FOR AT LEAST TWO  CONSECUTIVE  YEARS
 IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO THE DEED THEFT.
   § 2. Paragraph 7 of subdivision (a) of rule 3403 of the civil practice
 law and rules, as amended by chapter 203 of the laws of 2022, is amended
 to read as follows:
   7.  any  action which has been revived pursuant to section two hundred
 fourteen-g [or], two hundred fourteen-j, OR TWO  HUNDRED  FOURTEEN-K  of
 this chapter.
   §  3.  The  judiciary  law is amended by adding a new section 219-f to
 read as follows:
   § 219-F. RULES REVIVING CERTAIN ACTIONS; DEED THEFT. THE CHIEF  ADMIN-
 ISTRATOR  OF  THE  COURTS  SHALL PROMULGATE RULES FOR THE TIMELY ADJUDI-
 CATION OF REVIVED ACTIONS BROUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION TWO HUNDRED  FOUR-
 TEEN-K OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES.
   § 4. The provisions of this act shall be severable, and if any clause,
 sentence,  paragraph,  subdivision or part of this act shall be adjudged
 by any court of competent jurisdiction  to  be  invalid,  such  judgment
 shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall
 be  confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, subdi-
 vision or part thereof directly involved in  the  controversy  in  which
 such judgment shall have been rendered.
   §  5.  This act shall take effect immediately; provided, however, that
 section three of this act shall take effect three months after this  act
 shall have become a law.

Comments

Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.

Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Find your Senator and share your views on important issues.

Do you support this bill?

Senate Bill S7491B

Sponsored By

Current Bill Status - Passed Senate

Actions

Votes

Jun 3, 2026 - Floor Vote

Floor Vote: Jun 3, 2026

May 20, 2025 - Judiciary Committee Vote

Judiciary Committee Vote: May 20, 2025

Bill Amendments

2025-S7491 - Details

2025-S7491 - Summary

2025-S7491 - Sponsor Memo

2025-S7491 - Bill Text download pdf

co-Sponsors

2025-S7491A - Details

2025-S7491A - Summary

2025-S7491A - Sponsor Memo

2025-S7491A - Bill Text download pdf

co-Sponsors

2025-S7491B (ACTIVE) - Details

2025-S7491B (ACTIVE) - Summary

2025-S7491B (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

2025-S7491B (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments

Do you support this bill?

Get Status Alerts for 2025-S7491B

Senate Bill S7491B

Share this bill

Sponsored By

Current Bill Status - Passed Senate

Actions

Votes

Bill Amendments

2025-S7491 - Details

2025-S7491 - Summary

2025-S7491 - Sponsor Memo

2025-S7491 - Bill Text download pdf

co-Sponsors

2025-S7491A - Details

2025-S7491A - Summary

2025-S7491A - Sponsor Memo

2025-S7491A - Bill Text download pdf

co-Sponsors

2025-S7491B (ACTIVE) - Details

2025-S7491B (ACTIVE) - Summary

2025-S7491B (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

2025-S7491B (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments