Senate Bill S9967

2025-2026 Legislative Session

Allows issues before the public service commission to be determined publicly rather than through settlement discussions not open to the public

download bill text pdf

Current Bill Status - In Senate Committee Energy And Telecommunications Committee

Introduced
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
Delivered to Governor
Signed By Governor

Please enter your contact information

First Name

Last Name

Email Address

A valid email address is required.

Home address is used to determine the senate district in which you reside. Your support or opposition to this bill is then shared immediately with the senator who represents you.

Optional services from the NY State Senate:

Create an account. An account allows you to officially support or oppose key legislation, sign petitions with a single click, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Include a custom message for your Senator? (Optional)

Enter a message to your senator. Many New Yorkers use this to share the reasoning behind their support or opposition to the bill. Others might share a personal anecdote about how the bill would affect them or people they care about.

Actions

View Actions

Date of Action	Assembly Actions - Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Apr 20, 2026	referred to energy and telecommunications

2025-S9967 (ACTIVE) - Details

Current Committee:: Senate Energy And Telecommunications
Law Section:: Public Service Law
Laws Affected:: Amd §§66, 80 & 89-c, Pub Serv L

2025-S9967 (ACTIVE) - Summary

Provides that in any rate proceeding, any party may seek to sever from consideration in the settlement process or inclusion in any joint proposal any substantive issue that it discussed in its direct testimony.

2025-S9967 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

                                 
BILL NUMBER: S9967

SPONSOR: COMRIE
 
TITLE OF BILL:

An act to amend the public service law, in relation to allowing issues
before the public service commission to be determined publicly rather
than through settlement discussions not open to the public

 
PURPOSE:

To enhance transparency, fairness, and public accountability in Public
Service Commission (PSC) rate proceedings by allowing parties to require
that substantive issues be resolved through the public litigation proc-
ess rather than private settlement negotiations.

 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

This bill amends sections 66, 80, and 89-c of the public service law by
adding new subdivisions that establish a process by which parties may
sever substantive issues from settlement negotiations in rate
proceedings.

Defines key terms, including "joint proposal," "settlement process,"
"interlocutory review," "party," "moving party," and "substantive
issue," ensuring clarity in application; Any party may file a motion to
sever a substantive issue it raised in its direct testimony from the
settlement process, within ten days after the filing of reply testimony;
The motion must identify the issue(s) and corresponding portions of
testimony supporting the request; Other parties may respond within ten
days, either supporting or opposing the motion; The presiding adminis-
trative law judge (ALJ) must issue a written determination within
fifteen days, explaining whether the issue qualifies as a substantive
issue; The moving party may seek interlocutory review by the Commission
of the ALJ's determination.

Upon approval of a severance motion: The identified issue(s) may be
discussed in settlement negotiations only during the first sixty days
after settlement discussions formally commence. After sixty days, the
issue(s) must be resolved exclusively through the litigation process,
including evidentiary hearings and discovery, unless the moving party
affirmatively waives its right to sever; A waiver of severance does not
limit a party's ability to object to provisions in any resulting joint
proposal.

The act takes effect 120 days after becoming law and applies to PSC
proceedings initiated thereafter.

 
JUSTIFICATION:

While settlement negotiations are an important tool in resolving complex
PSC rate cases, they are typically conducted outside of public view and
may limit transparency into how key decisions affecting utility rates
and services are made. As a result, critical issues with significant
consumer impact may be resolved through private negotiation rather than
through a fully developed public record, which often does not incorpo-
rate the due diligence required to protect consumers.


This legislation preserves the benefits of settlement while restoring
balance by ensuring that parties retain the right to have substantive
issues adjudicated through an open and transparent process. By allowing
parties to sever issues they have meaningfully developed in testimony,
the bill ensures that such matters can be fully examined through discov-
ery, evidentiary hearings, and public Commission review.

The bill also introduces clear procedural timelines and standards to
prevent abuse of the severance process and to maintain efficiency in
proceedings. The limited 60-day window for settlement discussion of
severed issues encourages early resolution while ensuring that unre-
solved matters are ultimately subject to public adjudication.

By strengthening procedural fairness and increasing transparency, this
legislation promotes greater public confidence in the PSC's decision-
making and helps ensure that outcomes are based on a complete and acces-
sible evidentiary record.

 
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

This is a new bill.

 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

None.

 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect on the one hundred twentieth day after it
shall have become law and shall apply to PSC proceedings initiated on or
after such date. Necessary rulemaking is authorized prior to the effec-
tive date.

2025-S9967 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

                             
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                   9967
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                              April 20, 2026
                                ___________
 
 Introduced  by  Sen.  COMRIE -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
   printed to be committed to the Committee on  Energy  and  Telecommuni-
   cations
 
 AN  ACT  to amend the public service law, in relation to allowing issues
   before the public service commission to be determined publicly  rather
   than through settlement discussions not open to the public

   THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section 1. Section 66 of the public service law is amended by adding a
 new subdivision 33 to read as follows:
   33. (A) IN ANY RATE PROCEEDING, ANY  PARTY  MAY  SEEK  TO  SEVER  FROM
 CONSIDERATION  IN  THE  SETTLEMENT  PROCESS  OR  INCLUSION  IN ANY JOINT
 PROPOSAL ANY SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE THAT IT DISCUSSED IN ITS DIRECT TESTIMONY
 THROUGH A MOTION TO THE PRESIDING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE THAT IS FILED
 NO LATER THAN TEN DAYS AFTER THE LAST PERMITTED DATE FOR THE  FILING  OF
 REPLY  TESTIMONY  BY PARTIES. SUCH MOTION SHALL INDICATE THE SUBSTANTIVE
 ISSUE OR ISSUES FOR WHICH THE  MOVING  PARTY  SEEKS  SEVERANCE  AND  THE
 RELATED  PAGE  NUMBERS IN THE MOVING PARTY'S TESTIMONY. PARTIES MAY FILE
 RESPONSIVE MOTIONS WITHIN TEN DAYS SUPPORTING OR CHALLENGING THE  MOVING
 PARTY'S  ASSERTION THAT IT DEVELOPED THE IDENTIFIED SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE OR
 ISSUES IN ITS DIRECT TESTIMONY. THE PRESIDING ADMINISTRATIVE  LAW  JUDGE
 SHALL  ISSUE  A  WRITTEN  RULING WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF
 RESPONSES THAT PROVIDES THE REASONS FOR CONCLUDING THAT THE MOVING PARTY
 DID OR DID NOT PROVIDE A SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE OR SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES IN  ITS
 TESTIMONY.  THE  MOVING  PARTY MAY APPEAL THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S
 DECISION TO THE COMMISSION THROUGH A REQUEST  FOR  INTERLOCUTORY  REVIEW
 PURSUANT TO THE DEPARTMENT'S RULES.
   (B)  UPON  THE GRANTING OF THE MOTION BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE,
 OR OF THE REQUEST FOR INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW BY THE COMMISSION, THE  IDEN-
 TIFIED  SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE OR ISSUES MAY BE DISCUSSED IN SETTLEMENT NEGO-
 TIATIONS DURING THE FIRST SIXTY DAYS AFTER THE  FORMAL  COMMENCEMENT  OF
 SETTLEMENT  NEGOTIATIONS.  AFTER SIXTY DAYS HAVE ELAPSED, DISPOSITION OF
 THE SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES OR ISSUES SHALL  BE  SUBJECT  TO  THE  LITIGATION
 PROCESS ONLY UNLESS THE MOVING PARTY ADVISES THE PARTIES, ADMINISTRATIVE
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.

                                                            LBD15291-01-6
 S. 9967                             2
 
 LAW  JUDGE,  AND COMMISSION IN WRITING THAT IT WAIVES ITS RIGHT TO SEVER
 THE IDENTIFIED SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE OR ISSUES FROM THE  SETTLEMENT  PROCESS
 AND AGREES TO ALLOW DISCUSSION OF SUCH ISSUES IN SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS
 AND  POTENTIAL INCLUSION IN A JOINT PROPOSAL. WAIVING THE RIGHT TO SEVER
 DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE MOVING  PARTY  FROM  OBJECTING  TO  ANY  PROVISION
 INCLUDED IN A FILED JOINT PROPOSAL.
   (C)  AS  USED  IN THIS SUBDIVISION, THE FOLLOWING TERMS SHALL HAVE THE
 FOLLOWING MEANINGS:
   (I) "JOINT PROPOSAL" SHALL  MEAN  A  NEGOTIATED  SETTLEMENT  AGREEMENT
 SIGNED BY TWO OR MORE PARTIES IN A RATE PROCEEDING.
   (II)  "INTERLOCUTORY  REVIEW"  SHALL  MEAN  A MOTION TO THE COMMISSION
 REQUESTING REVIEW OF A RULING BY AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE.
   (III) THE "MOVING PARTY" SHALL MEAN THE PARTY WHO SEEKS  SEVERANCE  OF
 AN ISSUE OR ISSUES UNDER THIS SUBDIVISION.
   (IV)  "PARTY"  SHALL  MEAN  ANY  PARTY TO A COMMISSION RATE PROCEEDING
 OTHER THAN THE DEPARTMENT OR THE UTILITY.
   (V) "SETTLEMENT PROCESS" SHALL MEAN A SET OF  FORMAL  NEGOTIATIONS  OF
 THE  PARTIES ORGANIZED BY THE DEPARTMENT THAT IS INTENDED TO RESOLVE ALL
 OR SOME OF THE ISSUES IN  ANY  RATE  PROCEEDING  AND  LEAD  TO  A  JOINT
 PROPOSAL.
   (VI)  "SUBSTANTIVE  ISSUE" SHALL MEAN AN ISSUE IN WHICH TESTIMONY BY A
 MOVING PARTY CONTAINS ALLEGATIONS OF FACTS OR LAW, WHICH, AFTER  FURTHER
 DEVELOPMENT  THROUGH THE LITIGATION PROCESS, INCLUDING EVIDENTIARY HEAR-
 INGS, INTERROGATORIES OR DISCOVERY, MAY BE MATERIAL TO THE RESOLUTION OF
 THE ISSUE IN THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OR FINAL ORDER. THE INTENT OF THIS
 DEFINITION IS TO PERMIT ANY ALLEGATION  OF  FACT  WITH  ANY  EVIDENTIARY
 SUPPORT  OR  LEGAL CLAIM TO MEET THIS STANDARD; WHERE THE ISSUE CONCERNS
 AT LEAST IN PART A FACTUAL ALLEGATION,  ONLY  CONCLUSORY  ASSERTIONS  OF
 FACT WITHOUT ANY EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT IN THE MOVING PARTY'S TESTIMONY ARE
 NOT SUBSTANTIVE.
   §  2.  Section 80 of the public service law is amended by adding a new
 subdivision 13 to read as follows:
   13. (A) IN ANY RATE PROCEEDING, ANY  PARTY  MAY  SEEK  TO  SEVER  FROM
 CONSIDERATION  IN  THE  SETTLEMENT  PROCESS  OR  INCLUSION  IN ANY JOINT
 PROPOSAL ANY SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE THAT IT DISCUSSED IN ITS DIRECT TESTIMONY
 THROUGH A MOTION TO THE PRESIDING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE THAT IS FILED
 NO LATER THAN TEN DAYS AFTER THE LAST PERMITTED DATE FOR THE  FILING  OF
 REPLY  TESTIMONY  BY PARTIES. SUCH MOTION SHALL INDICATE THE SUBSTANTIVE
 ISSUE OR ISSUES FOR WHICH THE  MOVING  PARTY  SEEKS  SEVERANCE  AND  THE
 RELATED  PAGE  NUMBERS IN THE MOVING PARTY'S TESTIMONY. PARTIES MAY FILE
 RESPONSIVE MOTIONS WITHIN TEN DAYS SUPPORTING OR CHALLENGING THE  MOVING
 PARTY'S  ASSERTION THAT IT DEVELOPED THE IDENTIFIED SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE OR
 ISSUES IN ITS DIRECT TESTIMONY. THE PRESIDING ADMINISTRATIVE  LAW  JUDGE
 SHALL  ISSUE  A  WRITTEN  RULING WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF
 RESPONSES THAT PROVIDES THE REASONS FOR CONCLUDING THAT THE MOVING PARTY
 DID OR DID NOT PROVIDE A SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE OR SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES IN  ITS
 TESTIMONY.  THE  MOVING  PARTY MAY APPEAL THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S
 DECISION TO THE COMMISSION THROUGH A REQUEST  FOR  INTERLOCUTORY  REVIEW
 PURSUANT TO THE DEPARTMENT'S RULES.
   (B)  UPON  THE GRANTING OF THE MOTION BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE,
 OR OF THE REQUEST FOR INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW BY THE COMMISSION, THE  IDEN-
 TIFIED  SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE OR ISSUES MAY BE DISCUSSED IN SETTLEMENT NEGO-
 TIATIONS DURING THE FIRST SIXTY DAYS AFTER THE  FORMAL  COMMENCEMENT  OF
 SETTLEMENT  NEGOTIATIONS.  AFTER SIXTY DAYS HAVE ELAPSED, DISPOSITION OF
 THE SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES OR ISSUES SHALL  BE  SUBJECT  TO  THE  LITIGATION
 PROCESS ONLY UNLESS THE MOVING PARTY ADVISES THE PARTIES, ADMINISTRATIVE
 S. 9967                             3
 
 LAW  JUDGE,  AND COMMISSION IN WRITING THAT IT WAIVES ITS RIGHT TO SEVER
 THE IDENTIFIED SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE OR ISSUES FROM THE  SETTLEMENT  PROCESS
 AND AGREES TO ALLOW DISCUSSION OF SUCH ISSUES IN SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS
 AND  POTENTIAL INCLUSION IN A JOINT PROPOSAL. WAIVING THE RIGHT TO SEVER
 DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE MOVING  PARTY  FROM  OBJECTING  TO  ANY  PROVISION
 INCLUDED IN A FILED JOINT PROPOSAL.
   (C)  AS  USED  IN THIS SUBDIVISION, THE FOLLOWING TERMS SHALL HAVE THE
 FOLLOWING MEANINGS:
   (I) "JOINT PROPOSAL" SHALL  MEAN  A  NEGOTIATED  SETTLEMENT  AGREEMENT
 SIGNED BY TWO OR MORE PARTIES IN A RATE PROCEEDING.
   (II)  "INTERLOCUTORY  REVIEW"  SHALL  MEAN  A MOTION TO THE COMMISSION
 REQUESTING REVIEW OF A RULING BY AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE.
   (III) THE "MOVING PARTY" SHALL MEAN THE PARTY WHO SEEKS  SEVERANCE  OF
 AN ISSUE OR ISSUES UNDER THIS SUBDIVISION.
   (IV)  "PARTY"  SHALL  MEAN  ANY  PARTY TO A COMMISSION RATE PROCEEDING
 OTHER THAN THE DEPARTMENT OR THE UTILITY.
   (V) "SETTLEMENT PROCESS" SHALL MEAN A SET OF  FORMAL  NEGOTIATIONS  OF
 THE  PARTIES ORGANIZED BY THE DEPARTMENT THAT IS INTENDED TO RESOLVE ALL
 OR SOME OF THE ISSUES IN  ANY  RATE  PROCEEDING  AND  LEAD  TO  A  JOINT
 PROPOSAL.
   (VI)  "SUBSTANTIVE  ISSUE" SHALL MEAN AN ISSUE IN WHICH TESTIMONY BY A
 MOVING PARTY CONTAINS ALLEGATIONS OF FACTS OR LAW, WHICH, AFTER  FURTHER
 DEVELOPMENT  THROUGH THE LITIGATION PROCESS, INCLUDING EVIDENTIARY HEAR-
 INGS, INTERROGATORIES OR DISCOVERY, MAY BE MATERIAL TO THE RESOLUTION OF
 THE ISSUE IN THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OR FINAL ORDER. THE INTENT OF THIS
 DEFINITION IS TO PERMIT ANY ALLEGATION  OF  FACT  WITH  ANY  EVIDENTIARY
 SUPPORT  OR  LEGAL CLAIM TO MEET THIS STANDARD; WHERE THE ISSUE CONCERNS
 AT LEAST IN PART A FACTUAL ALLEGATION,  ONLY  CONCLUSORY  ASSERTIONS  OF
 FACT WITHOUT ANY EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT IN THE MOVING PARTY'S TESTIMONY ARE
 NOT SUBSTANTIVE.
   § 3. Section 89-c of the public service law is amended by adding a new
 subdivision 18 to read as follows:
   18.  (A)  IN  ANY  RATE  PROCEEDING,  ANY PARTY MAY SEEK TO SEVER FROM
 CONSIDERATION IN THE  SETTLEMENT  PROCESS  OR  INCLUSION  IN  ANY  JOINT
 PROPOSAL ANY SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE THAT IT DISCUSSED IN ITS DIRECT TESTIMONY
 THROUGH A MOTION TO THE PRESIDING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE THAT IS FILED
 NO  LATER  THAN TEN DAYS AFTER THE LAST PERMITTED DATE FOR THE FILING OF
 REPLY TESTIMONY BY PARTIES. SUCH MOTION SHALL INDICATE  THE  SUBSTANTIVE
 ISSUE  OR  ISSUES  FOR  WHICH  THE  MOVING PARTY SEEKS SEVERANCE AND THE
 RELATED PAGE NUMBERS IN THE MOVING PARTY'S TESTIMONY. PARTIES  MAY  FILE
 RESPONSIVE  MOTIONS WITHIN TEN DAYS SUPPORTING OR CHALLENGING THE MOVING
 PARTY'S ASSERTION THAT IT DEVELOPED THE IDENTIFIED SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE  OR
 ISSUES  IN  ITS DIRECT TESTIMONY. THE PRESIDING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
 SHALL ISSUE A WRITTEN RULING WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS  AFTER  THE  FILING  OF
 RESPONSES THAT PROVIDES THE REASONS FOR CONCLUDING THAT THE MOVING PARTY
 DID  OR DID NOT PROVIDE A SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE OR SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES IN ITS
 TESTIMONY. THE MOVING PARTY MAY APPEAL THE  ADMINISTRATIVE  LAW  JUDGE'S
 DECISION  TO  THE  COMMISSION THROUGH A REQUEST FOR INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW
 PURSUANT TO THE DEPARTMENT'S RULES.
   (B) UPON THE GRANTING OF THE MOTION BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE  LAW  JUDGE,
 OR  OF THE REQUEST FOR INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW BY THE COMMISSION, THE IDEN-
 TIFIED SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE OR ISSUES MAY BE DISCUSSED IN SETTLEMENT  NEGO-
 TIATIONS  DURING  THE  FIRST SIXTY DAYS AFTER THE FORMAL COMMENCEMENT OF
 SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS. AFTER SIXTY DAYS HAVE ELAPSED,  DISPOSITION  OF
 THE  SUBSTANTIVE  ISSUES  OR  ISSUES  SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE LITIGATION
 PROCESS ONLY UNLESS THE MOVING PARTY ADVISES THE PARTIES, ADMINISTRATIVE
 S. 9967                             4
 
 LAW JUDGE, AND COMMISSION IN WRITING THAT IT WAIVES ITS RIGHT  TO  SEVER
 THE  IDENTIFIED  SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE OR ISSUES FROM THE SETTLEMENT PROCESS
 AND AGREES TO ALLOW DISCUSSION OF SUCH ISSUES IN SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS
 AND  POTENTIAL INCLUSION IN A JOINT PROPOSAL. WAIVING THE RIGHT TO SEVER
 DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE MOVING  PARTY  FROM  OBJECTING  TO  ANY  PROVISION
 INCLUDED IN A FILED JOINT PROPOSAL.
   (C)  AS  USED  IN THIS SUBDIVISION, THE FOLLOWING TERMS SHALL HAVE THE
 FOLLOWING MEANINGS:
   (I) "JOINT PROPOSAL" SHALL  MEAN  A  NEGOTIATED  SETTLEMENT  AGREEMENT
 SIGNED BY TWO OR MORE PARTIES IN A RATE PROCEEDING.
   (II)  "INTERLOCUTORY  REVIEW"  SHALL  MEAN  A MOTION TO THE COMMISSION
 REQUESTING REVIEW OF A RULING BY AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE.
   (III) THE "MOVING PARTY" SHALL MEAN THE PARTY WHO SEEKS  SEVERANCE  OF
 AN ISSUE OR ISSUES UNDER THIS SUBDIVISION.
   (IV)  "PARTY"  SHALL  MEAN  ANY  PARTY TO A COMMISSION RATE PROCEEDING
 OTHER THAN THE DEPARTMENT OR THE UTILITY.
   (V) "SETTLEMENT PROCESS" SHALL MEAN A SET OF  FORMAL  NEGOTIATIONS  OF
 THE  PARTIES ORGANIZED BY THE DEPARTMENT THAT IS INTENDED TO RESOLVE ALL
 OR SOME OF THE ISSUES IN  ANY  RATE  PROCEEDING  AND  LEAD  TO  A  JOINT
 PROPOSAL.
   (VI)  "SUBSTANTIVE  ISSUE" SHALL MEAN AN ISSUE IN WHICH TESTIMONY BY A
 MOVING PARTY CONTAINS ALLEGATIONS OF FACTS OR LAW, WHICH, AFTER  FURTHER
 DEVELOPMENT  THROUGH THE LITIGATION PROCESS, INCLUDING EVIDENTIARY HEAR-
 INGS, INTERROGATORIES OR DISCOVERY, MAY BE MATERIAL TO THE RESOLUTION OF
 THE ISSUE IN THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OR FINAL ORDER. THE INTENT OF THIS
 DEFINITION IS TO PERMIT ANY ALLEGATION  OF  FACT  WITH  ANY  EVIDENTIARY
 SUPPORT  OR  LEGAL CLAIM TO MEET THIS STANDARD; WHERE THE ISSUE CONCERNS
 AT LEAST IN PART A FACTUAL ALLEGATION,  ONLY  CONCLUSORY  ASSERTIONS  OF
 FACT WITHOUT ANY EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT IN THE MOVING PARTY'S TESTIMONY ARE
 NOT SUBSTANTIVE.
   § 4. This act shall take effect on the one hundred twentieth day after
 it shall have become a law, and shall apply to public service commission
 proceedings  initiated on or after such date. Effective immediately, the
 addition, amendment and/or repeal of any rule  or  regulation  necessary
 for  the implementation of this act on its effective date are authorized
 to be made and completed on or before such effective date.

Comments

Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.

Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Find your Senator and share your views on important issues.

Do you support this bill?

Senate Bill S9967

Sponsored By

Current Bill Status - In Senate Committee Energy And Telecommunications Committee

Actions

2025-S9967 (ACTIVE) - Details

2025-S9967 (ACTIVE) - Summary

2025-S9967 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

2025-S9967 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments

Do you support this bill?

Get Status Alerts for 2025-S9967

Senate Bill S9967

Share this bill

Sponsored By

Leroy Comrie

Current Bill Status - In Senate Committee Energy And Telecommunications Committee

Actions

2025-S9967 (ACTIVE) - Details

2025-S9967 (ACTIVE) - Summary

2025-S9967 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

2025-S9967 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments