S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
4343
2009-2010 Regular Sessions
I N A S S E M B L Y
February 3, 2009
___________
Introduced by M. of A. BRODSKY -- read once and referred to the Commit-
tee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions
AN ACT to amend the public authorities law, in relation to subcontract-
ing by public authorities
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Article 9 of the public authorities law is amended by
adding a new title 4-A to read as follows:
TITLE 4-A
SUBCONTRACTING BY PUBLIC AUTHORITIES
SECTION 2883. CONTRACTS FOR PROFESSIONAL, MAINTENANCE, CLERICAL, OR
TECHNICAL SERVICES.
S 2883. CONTRACTS FOR PROFESSIONAL, MAINTENANCE, CLERICAL, OR TECHNI-
CAL SERVICES. 1. DEFINITIONS. AS USED IN THIS TITLE, THE FOLLOWING TERMS
HAVE THE FOLLOWING MEANINGS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:
(A) "PUBLIC AUTHORITY" MEANS (1) ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY, PUBLIC BENEFIT
CORPORATION, OR COMMISSION CREATED BY OR EXISTING UNDER THIS CHAPTER;
(2) ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY OR A PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION, AT LEAST ONE
OF WHOSE MEMBERS IS APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR OR WHO SERVES AS A MEMBER
BY VIRTUE OF HOLDING A CIVIL OFFICE OF THE STATE; (3) A NOT-FOR-PROFIT
CORPORATION AFFILIATED WITH, SPONSORED BY, OR CREATED BY A STATE AGENCY;
(4) A NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION CREATED BY OR EXISTING UNDER ARTICLE
TWO OF THE RACING, PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING AND BREEDING LAW AND OPERATING
UNDER AN EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE GRANTED BY THE STATE; (5) A MUNICIPAL
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OR OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION;
OR (6) A SUBSIDIARY OR AFFILIATE OF A PUBLIC AUTHORITY.
(B) "CONTRACT" MEANS AN ENFORCEABLE AGREEMENT, ENTERED INTO BY A
CONTRACTOR AND A PUBLIC AUTHORITY, WHICH EXCEEDS TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOU-
SAND DOLLARS. A SINGLE CONTRACT WHICH IS DIVIDED INTO SEPARATE CONTRACTS
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD08201-01-9
A. 4343 2
SOLELY TO AVOID THE APPLICATION OF THIS TITLE SHALL BE DEEMED A SINGLE
CONTRACT FOR PURPOSES OF THIS TITLE.
(C) "CONTRACTOR" MEANS ANY PERSON, PARTNERSHIP, FIRM, CORPORATION,
ASSOCIATION, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OR OTHER ENTITY RENDERING OR
PROVIDING PROFESSIONAL, MAINTENANCE, CLERICAL, OR TECHNICAL SERVICES
PURSUANT TO A CONTRACT WITH A PUBLIC AUTHORITY.
(D) "SERVICES" MEANS ANY PROFESSIONAL, MAINTENANCE, CLERICAL, OR TECH-
NICAL SERVICES CURRENTLY PERFORMED BY MEMBERS OF THE PROFESSIONAL, MAIN-
TENANCE, CLERICAL, AND TECHNICAL BARGAINING UNIT OF A PUBLIC AUTHORITY
OR WHICH COME WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE OF THE
MEMBERS OF SUCH BARGAINING UNIT.
(E) "CHANGE ORDER" MEANS A WRITTEN ORDER BY A PUBLIC AUTHORITY DIRECT-
ING THE CONTRACTOR TO MAKE CHANGES IN A CONTRACT.
(F) "CONTRACT MODIFICATION" MEANS ANY WRITTEN ALTERATION TO SPECIFICA-
TIONS, DELIVERY POINT, RATE OF DELIVERY, PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, PRICE,
QUALITY, OR OTHER PROVISIONS OF ANY CONTRACT ACCOMPLISHED BY MUTUAL
ACTION OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONTRACT.
2. GUIDELINES FOR CONTRACTING FOR SERVICES. NO CONTRACT WITH A
CONTRACTOR FOR SERVICES SHALL BE ENTERED INTO BY A PUBLIC AUTHORITY
UNLESS CONTRACTING FOR SUCH SERVICES IS:
(A) COST EFFECTIVE WHEN COMPARED TO THE COST OF HAVING A PUBLIC
AUTHORITY PERFORM THE WORK; OR
(B) REQUIRED FOR A SHORT DURATION, MAKING IT IMPRACTICAL TO HIRE
BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEES TO PERFORM THE SERVICE; OR
(C) REQUIRED FOR SPECIAL EXPERTISE NOT CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN THE
BARGAINING UNIT; OR
(D) REQUIRED DUE TO AN URGENT NEED SUCH THAT THE DELAY IN HIRING
EMPLOYEES WOULD FRUSTRATE THE PUBLIC INTEREST; OR
(E) REQUIRED TO AVOID A CONFLICT OF INTEREST; OR
(F) OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO BE SO CONTRACTED; OR
(G) IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PUBLIC AUTHORITY'S AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
EFFORTS AND WILL NOT CAUSE THE PUBLIC AUTHORITY TO FAIL TO MEET ITS
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION GOALS. A CONTRACTOR MUST ALSO MEET OR EXCEED THE
PUBLIC AUTHORITY'S GOALS FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION; OR
(H) IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF APPLICABLE STATE, LOCAL,
AND FEDERAL LAW.
3. COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS. IN DETERMINING IF A CONTRACT IS COST EFFEC-
TIVE, THE PUBLIC AUTHORITY SHALL PERFORM A COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS WHICH
SHALL EVALUATE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING FACTORS:
(A) REIMBURSEMENT FROM OTHER SOURCES;
(B) BOTH THE DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS OF PERFORMING THE WORK;
(C) WHETHER OR NOT THE CONTRACTOR PROVIDES WAGES AND SUPPLEMENTS TO
ITS EMPLOYEES WHICH ARE COMPARABLE TO THOSE PAID TO SIMILAR EMPLOYEES
PERFORMING SIMILAR WORK IN THE GEOGRAPHIC AREA WHERE THE WORK IS TO BE
PERFORMED. A CONTRACT MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED COST EFFECTIVE IF SUCH WAGES
AND SUPPLEMENTS ARE SUBSTANTIALLY BELOW THOSE CUSTOMARILY PAID IN THE
AREA; AND
(D) THE QUALITY OF SERVICE BEING PROVIDED.
4. REVIEW OF CONTRACTS FOR SERVICES. (A) PRIOR TO EXECUTING A CONTRACT
FOR SERVICES, A PUBLIC AUTHORITY SHALL PREPARE A SPECIFIC STATEMENT
WHICH SETS FORTH THE OBJECTIVE DATA SUPPORTING THE REASONS WHY THE
PROPOSED CONTRACT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISION TWO OF
THIS SECTION.
(B) (1) PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED AWARD OF A CONTRACT FOR SERVICES, A
PUBLIC AUTHORITY SHALL PROVIDE TO THE EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION THAT REPRES-
ENTS PUBLIC AUTHORITY EMPLOYEES WHO WOULD OTHERWISE PERFORM SUCH
A. 4343 3
SERVICES WITH COPIES OF THE STATEMENT RENDERED PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (A)
OF THIS SUBDIVISION AND THE PROPOSED CONTRACT SO THAT SUCH EMPLOYEE
ORGANIZATION SHALL HAVE AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS TO OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED
CONTRACT. AN EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION WHICH PROVIDES TIMELY WRITTEN NOTICE
OF OBJECTION AND THE REASONS THEREFOR SHALL, UNLESS THE PUBLIC AUTHORITY
AGREES IN WRITING TO WITHDRAW THE PROPOSED CONTRACT, BE PERMITTED TO BE
HEARD BY THE PUBLIC AUTHORITY ON ITS OBJECTIONS PRIOR TO THE AWARD OF
THE CONTRACT. WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS OF RECEIPT OF ANY SUCH OBJECTIONS, THE
PUBLIC AUTHORITY, AFTER CONSIDERING THE OBJECTIONS OF THE EMPLOYEE
ORGANIZATION, SHALL NOTIFY THE EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION WHETHER THE PUBLIC
AUTHORITY WILL WITHDRAW THE PROPOSED CONTRACT OR ENTER INTO THE
CONTRACT. IF THE PUBLIC AUTHORITY DECIDES TO ENTER INTO THE CONTRACT,
AND THE EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION STILL BELIEVES THAT THE CONTRACT IS IN
VIOLATION OF THE GUIDELINES IN SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION, THE
EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO BRING A PROCEEDING PURSU-
ANT TO ARTICLE SEVENTY-EIGHT OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES TO
DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE APPROVAL WAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION.
(2) NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF SUBPARAGRAPH ONE OF THIS PARA-
GRAPH, THE EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION MAY BE PROVIDED LESS THAN THE REQUIRED
FIFTEEN DAYS TO OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED CONTRACT WHEN THE CONTRACT IS
REQUIRED TO RESPOND TO AN EMERGENCY WITHIN THE SCOPE OF PARAGRAPH (D) OF
SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION.
5. CHANGE ORDERS AND CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS. IF A PUBLIC AUTHORITY
INTENDS TO CHANGE, BY USE OF A CHANGE ORDER OR CONTRACT MODIFICATION, A
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES, AND SUCH CHANGE RESULTS IN CAUSING THE AMOUNT OF
THE CONTRACT TO EXCEED ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL
CONTRACT AMOUNT, THEN APPROVAL OF SUCH CHANGES SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION FOUR OF THIS SECTION.
S 2. This act shall take effect on the first of April next succeeding
the date on which it shall have become a law.