S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
7219
I N S E N A T E
March 24, 2010
___________
Introduced by Sen. BRESLIN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Insurance
AN ACT to amend the insurance law, in relation to excess line brokers
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Paragraphs 3 and 4 of subsection (b) of section 2118 of the
insurance law, paragraph 3 as amended by chapter 684 of the laws of
1993, subparagraph (A) of paragraph 3 as amended by chapter 498 of the
laws of 1996, and paragraph 4 as amended by chapter 630 of the laws of
1988, are amended to read as follows:
(3) (A) The submission of insurance documents to the excess line asso-
ciation shall be accompanied by a statement subscribed to, and affirmed
by, the licensee or sublicensee as true under the penalties of perjury
that, after diligent effort, the full amount of insurance required could
not be procured, from authorized insurers, each of which is authorized
to write insurance of the kind requested and which the licensee has
reason to believe might consider writing the type of coverage or class
of insurance involved, and further showing that the amount of insurance
procured from an unauthorized insurer is only the excess over the amount
procurable from an authorized insurer. The licensee, however, shall be
excused from affirming that a diligent effort, as defined above, was
made to procure the coverage from authorized insurers if the licensee's
affidavit is accompanied by the affidavit of another broker involved in
the placement affirming as true under the penalties of perjury that,
after diligent effort by the affirming broker, the required insurance
could not be procured from an authorized insurer which the affirming
broker had reason to believe might consider writing the type of coverage
or class of insurance involved. The licensee and the affirming broker
shall be excused from affirming that a diligent effort was made (I) FOR
TRANSACTIONS DEFINED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (F) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, OR (II) if
the superintendent determines, pursuant to paragraph four of this
subsection, that no declinations are required.
(B) A licensee or affirming broker shall be considered to have the
reason to believe required by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph if the
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD16053-02-0
S. 7219 2
decision to offer the risk to the authorized insurer was based on any of
the following:
(i) Recent acceptance by the authorized insurer of a type of coverage
or class of insurance similar to that for which coverage is presently
being sought;
(ii) Advertising by the authorized insurer or its agent indicating
that the authorized insurer is willing to consider acceptance of this or
a similar type of coverage or class of insurance;
(iii) Media communications (i.e., newspaper or magazine articles,
trade publications, television and radio programming) indicating that
the authorized insurer is writing, or is considering writing, this type
of coverage or class of insurance;
(iv) Communications with other insurance professionals, risk managers,
trade associations, the excess line association or the insurance depart-
ment, which indicates that the authorized insurer might consider writing
this type of coverage or class of insurance; or
(v) Any other valid basis for making such decision.
(C) Every licensee, or affirming broker, in connection with the place-
ment of each risk pursuant to this section, shall record on the affida-
vit required pursuant to subparagraph (A) of this paragraph the informa-
tion relied upon that formed the basis of such licensee's or affirming
broker's reason to believe that the authorized insurer might consider
writing the type of coverage or class of insurance involved.
(D) Declinations obtained from authorized insurers which are affil-
iates of, or, as defined in article fifteen of this chapter, under
common control with, each other or the unauthorized insurer shall not
meet the requirements of this subsection unless such related insurers
operate as distinct and autonomous entities, and for underwriting
purposes, compete with each other for the same type of coverage or class
of insurance.
(E) (I) The superintendent, in a regulation, may determine whether
there are circumstances where it may be appropriate, due to the unavail-
ability from an authorized insurer of the leading type of coverage or
the leading class of insurance required by the insured, to waive the
requirement in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph that a licensee may
procure from an unauthorized insurer only the amount of insurance which
is excess over the amount procurable from an authorized insurer, and to
instead permit the licensee to procure from an unauthorized insurer the
full amount of insurance required by the insured.
(II) WITH RESPECT TO ANY QUOTE FOR COVERAGE FROM AN AUTHORIZED INSURER
WHERE THE GROSS PREMIUM EXCEEDS BY TWENTY-FIVE PERCENT OR MORE, A QUOTE
FOR COMPARABLE COVERAGE ACQUIRED BY A LICENSEE MAY BE SUBMITTED AS A
DECLINATION BY THE LICENSEE OR AFFIRMING BROKER.
(F) NO DILIGENT EFFORT SHALL BE REQUIRED WHERE THE POLICY PROCURED:
(I) INSURES A PUBLICLY TRADED ENTITY,
(II) INSURES AN ENTITY WHICH PAYS AGGREGATE ANNUAL PREMIUMS ON ALL
RISKS TOTALING AT LEAST ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR POLICIES WRIT-
TEN EXCLUSIVE OF PREMIUM FOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND HEALTH INSURANCE
BENEFITS, EMPLOYS, UTILIZES OR RETAINS A RISK MANAGER TO ASSIST IN THE
NEGOTIATION AND PURCHASE OF A POLICY; AND IN ADDITION, IN ALL CASES
MEETS ANY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: HAS A NET WORTH OF AT LEAST
TWENTY-FIVE MILLION DOLLARS, IS A FOR-PROFIT BUSINESS ENTITY THAT GENER-
ATES ANNUAL GROSS REVENUES OF FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS, IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT
ORGANIZATION OR PUBLIC ENTITY WITH AN ANNUAL BUDGET EXCEEDING
TWENTY-FIVE MILLION DOLLARS OR IS A MUNICIPALITY WITH A POPULATION OF
NOT LESS THAN FIFTY THOUSAND PERSONS, OR
S. 7219 3
(III) RENEWS A POLICY WITH THE SAME INSURER FOR A SECOND CONSECUTIVE
ONE YEAR TERM, OR RENEWS THE POLICY FOR A THIRD CONSECUTIVE ONE YEAR
TERM.
(4) The number of declinations constituting diligent effort in regard
to placement of coverage with authorized insurers for purposes of para-
graph three of this subsection shall be three, unless (A) THE DILIGENT
EFFORT IS EXCUSED BY SUBPARAGRAPH (F) OF PARAGRAPH THREE OF THIS
SUBSECTION, OR (B) the superintendent after a hearing, on a record, upon
findings and conclusions, determines that another number of such decli-
nations is appropriate in regard to particular coverages. In making such
determinations, the superintendent shall consider relevant market condi-
tions, including [unavailability of particular coverages from authorized
insurers, and may conduct market surveys] WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS
OF INSUREDS SEEKING INSURANCE, THE NECESSITY FOR MANUSCRIPTED POLICIES
WHERE STANDARD FORMS ARE INADEQUATE OR UNAVAILABLE, FOSTERING INSURANCE
PRODUCT INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT, AND WHERE PARTICULAR COVERAGES ARE
NOT REASONABLY AND WIDELY AVAILABLE. THE SUPERINTENDENT MAY CONDUCT
MARKET SURVEYS TO DETERMINE MARKET CONDITIONS. Any such determination
shall be reviewed at least annually by the superintendent.
S 2. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall
have become a law; provided, however, that the amendments to subsection
(b) of section 2118 of the insurance law made by section one of this act
shall not affect the expiration of such subsection and shall be deemed
to expire therewith.