Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|
---|---|
Jan 04, 2012 |
referred to education returned to senate died in assembly |
Mar 02, 2011 |
referred to education |
Mar 01, 2011 |
delivered to assembly passed senate ordered to third reading cal.145 reported and committed to rules |
Feb 26, 2011 |
print number 3501b |
Feb 26, 2011 |
amend and recommit to education |
Feb 25, 2011 |
print number 3501a |
Feb 25, 2011 |
amend and recommit to education |
Feb 23, 2011 |
referred to education |
Senate Bill S3501
2011-2012 Legislative Session
Relates to retaining quality teachers when teaching positions are eliminated in city school districts in cities with a population of one million or more; repealer
download bill text pdfSponsored By
(R, C, IP) Senate District
Archive: Last Bill Status - In Senate Committee Education Committee
- Introduced
-
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
-
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
-
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- Delivered to Governor
- Signed By Governor
Actions
Votes
-
-
-
-
Floor Vote: Mar 1, 2011
aye (33)nay (27)
-
Mar 1, 2011 - Rules Committee Vote
S35018Aye9Nay6Aye with Reservations0Absent1Excused0Abstained-
-
Rules Committee Vote: Mar 1, 2011
excused (1)
-
Mar 1, 2011 - Education Committee Vote
S35014Aye8Nay6Aye with Reservations0Absent0Excused0Abstained-
-
Education Committee Vote: Mar 1, 2011
aye (4)
-
-
-
Bill Amendments
2011-S3501 - Details
- Current Committee:
- Senate Education
- Law Section:
- Education Law
- Laws Affected:
- Amd ยง2588, rpld & add subs 3 & 4, rpld sub 7, Ed L
2011-S3501 - Sponsor Memo
BILL NUMBER:S3501 TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the education law, in relation to retaining quality teachers and teachers in shortage subject areas when teaching positions are eliminated in city school districts of cities having one million or more inhabitants; and to repeal certain provisions of such law relating thereto PURPOSE OF THE BILL: This bill would create a default layoff mechanism in New York City in effect unless and until such time as the City of New York and its teachers' union collectively bargain new layoff procedures. Decision-making based solely on seniority would be prohibited in any bargaining agreement. SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section 1: Title. Section 2: A technical change to section 2588 of the education law to change "more than one million inhabitants" to "one million inhabitants or more".
Section 3: requires the City school district and its employee collective bargaining agents to establish a procedure governing the abolishment or reduction of teaching or supervisory positions citywide pursuant to article 14 of the civil service law. An employee's length of service can no longer be the sale factor in determining which positions to abolish. In addition, this section ensures that high need schools (schools with greater than 90 percent eligibility for free and reduced price lunch) do not bear a disproportionate share of workforce reductions. In the absence of a collective bargaining agreement governing staff reduction a default layoff mechanism for New York City governs any citywide layoff in the following manner: * Seniority is no longer the sole basis for any layoff decision. * The district will first make layoff decisions on a citywide basis, based on specific categories of teachers. Per the provisions of this bill, until such time as the City district and the union collectively bargain a layoff procedure, these category-based layoffs would still be made by license area {English, carpentry, common branch elementary, etc. * Under this bill there are nine categories established which constitutes a subset of staff which would in the first instance be laid off until the citywide layoff number is achieved. Staff that fall into multiple categories would be laid off first and then layoffs would proceed through each individual category until such time as the citywide layoff number is achieved. Unless the entire license is eliminated, the following teachers would be laid off first within any given license area: o A School-based personnel with at least one rating of "unsatisfactory" in the five academic years preceding the year in which layoffs would take effect; o B - A finding of guilt on 3020-a charges without termination in the last five years; o C - Status as school-based personnel without a permanent position for six months or more as of the start of the school year in which layoffs will occur; o D - Any convicted of criminal charges without termination in the last five years; o E - A finding of excessive or improper lateness or absenteeism without adequate cause or improper use of leave time by a time and attendance arbitrator in the last five years; o F - Investigations by the Special Commissioner of Investigation (SCI), the Office of Equal opportunity (OEO), or the Office of Special Investigations (OSI) that led to substantiated allegations of misconduct in the last five years; o G - School based personnel who failed to fulfill all requirements for state certification as of August 31 of the year in which layoffs will be enacted; o H - Teachers in grades 4-8 who for two years or more ranked in the bottom thirty percent of all teachers in student test scores progress as measured by the City school district's value added assessment except for teachers who are licensed to teach special education or special needs children; and o I - Teachers granted an extension regarding tenure in the year preceding city wide layoff. * When the number of employees laid off by way of the above process is less than the number of total layoffs required, the Regents will promulgate regulations by that date governing the layoffs of any additional teachers, beyond those laid off in the above process. Such regulations must ensure that an employee's length of service is not the sole factor in determining a layoff and that an employee's salary is not a factor in layoff decisions. These additional layoffs need not be made by license category. * In the event the Regents do not promulgate regulations within 75 days of the first day of school, building principals will make additional layoff decisions pursuant to guidance put forth by the Chancellor. The principal shall make the decisions after considering the recommendations of school based committee comprised of teachers, administrators and parents. * In schools where 90 percent of students receive free or reduced-price lunch, layoffs made subsequent to the categories-based layoff process shall not exceed a percentage of the overall number of positions in the school that represents half of the average percentage laid off made subsequent to the categories-based process in schools citywide. This excludes employees in the categories outlined above or employees laid off because of the system-wide elimination of a license area. This requirement would apply to any mechanism that is collectively bargained, promulgated by the Regents or set forth by the Chancellor and implemented by principals. * When schools remove positions for any reason, absent a citywide layoff condition, the sole basis for such decisions will not be employee length of service. This bill requires such a process to be collectively bargained, pursuant to education law 3012-c. In the event it is not collectively bargained by 90 days before the start of the school year, decisions are to be made using all above categories. In the event the number of positions needed to be removed exceeds the number in these categories, the Regents are to promulgate regulations. In the event that by 75 days before the start of the school year, the Regents have not promulgated regulations, principals are to make the decision per guidance issued by the Chancellor. Such regulations or guidance must ensure that employee length of service is not the sole factor in layoff decisions and that salary is not a factor in layoff decisions. Section 4: requires employee rights to return to vacant positions to be collectively bargained. In the absence of a collective bargaining agreement when layoffs are made the following process shall apply: Whenever a teaching or supervisory position is abolished pursuant to the Regents or chancellor and should a vacancy occur in the same position at the same school or administrative office within one year of the date when the position was abolished, the principal, or the chancellor or his or her designee, shall offer the position to the person who held the position before it was abolished. If the person rejects the offer, or fails to respond to the offer within thirty days, the person shall no longer have a right to return to the position. If more than one position was abolished in the same license area at the same school or administrative office,. and there are fewer vacancies in the same license area than persons whose positions were abolished, the principal, or the chancellor, shall have the discretion to determine which person should be offered the position first. Teachers or supervisors laid off pursuant to the nine categories outlined above shall have no rights to return to a vacant position pursuant. Section 5: repeals paragraph 7 of section 2588 of the education law which is replaced by language in Section 4. Section 6: severability. Section 7: effective date. JUSTIFICATION: This bill will allow high quality teachers to remain in the classroom during years when citywide layoffs are required. PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New bill. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None to the State. EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately.
2011-S3501 - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 3501 2011-2012 Regular Sessions I N S E N A T E February 23, 2011 ___________ Introduced by Sen. FLANAGAN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Education AN ACT to amend the education law, in relation to retaining quality teachers and teachers in shortage subject areas when teaching posi- tions are eliminated in city school districts of cities having one million or more inhabitants; and to repeal certain provisions of such law relating thereto THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "keep effective and excellent professionals in the classroom act". S 2. The section heading of section 2588 of the education law, as added by chapter 521 of the laws of 1976, is amended to read as follows: Seniority, retention and displacement rights in connection with aboli- tion of positions in city school districts of cities having [more than] one million inhabitants OR MORE. S 3. Subdivision 3 of section 2588 of the education law is REPEALED and a new subdivision 3 is added to read as follows: 3. (A) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND ITS EMPLOYEES' COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGENTS SHALL ESTABLISH A PROCEDURE GOVERNING THE ABOLISHMENT OR REDUCTION OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS CITYWIDE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE FOURTEEN OF THE CIVIL SERVICE LAW. ANY SUCH LOCALLY ESTABLISHED PROCESS SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT OF POSITIONS OR PERSONS TO BE LAID OFF OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT ANY SUCH LOCALLY ESTABLISHED PROCESS SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD09505-07-1
S. 3501 2 A FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; AND PROVIDED FURTHER THAT ANY SUCH LOCALLY ESTABLISHED PROCESS MUST ENSURE THAT HIGH QUALITY TEACHERS IN HIGH-NEED SCHOOLS ARE NOT LAID OFF AND THAT HIGH-NEED SCHOOLS DO NOT BEAR A DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE OF WORKFORCE REDUCTIONS PURSUANT TO A CITYWIDE LAYOFF, PROVIDED HOWEVER, NOTHING SHALL PROHIBIT THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM ABOLISHING ALL POSITIONS IN A LICENSE AREA PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (IV) OF THIS PARAGRAPH. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, A HIGH-NEED SCHOOL SHALL BE DEFINED AS A SCHOOL IN WHICH AT LEAST NINETY PERCENT OF THE ENROLLED STUDENTS ARE ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS FOR THE FREE AND REDUCED PRICE LUNCH PROGRAM. FOR POSITIONS COVERED BY SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWELVE-C OF THIS CHAPTER, ANY SUCH LOCALLY DEVELOPED PROCESS SHALL BE BASED ON THE ANNUAL PROFES- SIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR TEACHERS AND SUPERVISORS PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWELVE-C OF THIS CHAPTER AND ITS IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS. UNTIL AND UNLESS SUCH A PROCESS HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED AT LEAST NINETY DAYS BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ANY SUCH ABOLISHMENT OR REDUCTION OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS CITYWIDE, THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY: (I) THE FOLLOWING TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS SHALL BE LAID OFF PRIOR TO ANY OTHER TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS: (A) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO RECEIVED A RATING OF "UNSATISFACTORY" ON HIS OR HER ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW IN THE LAST FIVE SCHOOL YEARS OR "INEFFECTIVE" IN THE EVENT A NEW ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWELVE-C OF THIS CHAPTER; (B) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR, IF THE PERSON IS A TENURED EMPLOYEE, WHO WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS HAS BEEN FINED OR SUSPENDED WITHOUT PAY AS A PENALTY IMPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWENTY-A OF THIS CHAPTER OR AS A RESULT OF A SETTLEMENT OF CHARGES BROUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWENTY-A OF THIS CHAPTER; (C) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR NOT CURRENTLY APPOINTED TO A REGULAR POSITION IN A SCHOOL FOR A PERIOD OF SIX MONTHS OR MORE AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ANY CITYWIDE LAYOFF PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION; (D) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR CONVICTED OF CRIMINAL CHARGES THE PAST FIVE YEARS; (E) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR, IF THE PERSON IS A TENURED EMPLOYEE, WHO WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS HAS BEEN FINED AS A PENALTY IMPOSED PURSUANT TO CHARGES RELATED TO CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM, CHRONIC LATENESS, OR IMPROPER USE OR RECORDING OF LEAVE TIME OR AS A RESULT OF SETTLEMENT OF CHARGES BROUGHT PURSUANT TO CHARGES RELATED TO CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM, CHRONIC LATENESS OR IMPROPER USE OR RECORDING OF LEAVE TIME; (F) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS WAS THE SUBJECT OF AN INVESTIGATION WHERE ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT WERE SUBSTANTIATED BY THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SPECIAL COMMISSIONER OF INVESTIGATION, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS OR THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S OFFICE OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY; (G) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO HAS FAILED TO FULFILL ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATION FROM THE DEPARTMENT AS OF AUGUST THIRTY- FIRST OF THE YEAR IN WHICH THERE IS A CITYWIDE LAYOFF; (H) ANY TEACHER, FOR TWO YEARS OR MORE, RANKED IN THE BOTTOM THIRTY PERCENT OF ALL TEACH- ERS IN STUDENT TEST SCORES PROGRESS AS MEASURED BY THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S VALUE-ADDED ASSESSMENT EXCEPT FOR TEACHERS WHO WORK IN LICENSES RELATED TO TEACHING CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES OR SPECIAL NEEDS; AND (I) TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO ENTERED AGREEMENTS TO SERVE AN ADDITIONAL YEAR AS A PROBATIONER PURSUANT TO SECTION TWENTY-FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY-THREE OF THIS ARTICLE FOR THE SCHOOL YEAR PRECEDING A CITYWIDE LAYOFF. S. 3501 3 (II) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, IN THE CASE THAT THE NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS THAT ARE ABOLISHED, OR THE NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES THAT ARE LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARA- GRAPH IS GREATER THAN THE NUMBER OF SUCH POSITIONS THAT MUST BE ABOL- ISHED OR REDUCED AS A RESULT OF A CITYWIDE LAYOFF, THEN THE DECISION CONCERNING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED, AND WHICH PERSONS OCCU- PYING SUCH POSITIONS ARE TO BE LAID OFF, SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SUBPARAGRAPH. (1) THE FOLLOWING PROTOCOL SHALL BE USED UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE TOTAL NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES IDENTIFIED IS EQUAL TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS ABOLISHED. FOR PURPOSES OF THE PROTO- COL, THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL BE RANKED ALPHA- BETICALLY (A) THROUGH (I), PROVIDED THAT (A) SHALL BE RANKED THE HIGHEST PRIORITY AND (I) SHALL BE RANKED THE LOWEST PRIORITY. THE PROTOCOL SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AS FOLLOWS: A. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL IN ALL NINE OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH; B. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN EIGHT OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIOR- ITY OF THOSE EIGHT CATEGORIES; C. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN SEVEN OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIOR- ITY OF THOSE SEVEN CATEGORIES; D. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN SIX OF THE CATEGORIES LIST- ED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARA- GRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIORITY OF THOSE SIX CATEGORIES; E. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN FIVE OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIOR- ITY OF THOSE FIVE CATEGORIES; F. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN FOUR OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIOR- ITY OF THOSE FOUR CATEGORIES; G. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN THREE OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIOR- ITY OF THOSE THREE CATEGORIES; H. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN TWO OF THE CATEGORIES LIST- ED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARA- GRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIORITY OF THOSE TWO CATEGORIES; I. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO RECEIVED A RATING OF "UNSATISFACTORY" IN ANY OF THE LAST FIVE SCHOOL YEARS ON THEIR ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW; PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT IF FEWER LAYOFFS ARE REQUIRED THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, LAYOFFS SHALL BE DONE IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER: I. A TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WITH THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF UNSATISFACTORY RATINGS IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS; AND S. 3501 4 II. A TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WITH AN UNSATISFACTORY RATING RECEIVED IN THE MOST RECENT YEAR OR YEARS; J. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR, IF THE PERSON IS A TENURED EMPLOYEE, WHO WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS HAS BEEN FINED OR SUSPENDED WITHOUT PAY AS A PENALTY IMPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWENTY-A OF THIS CHAPTER OR AS A RESULT OF A SETTLEMENT OF CHARGES BROUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWENTY-A OF THIS CHAPTER; PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT IF FEWER LAYOFFS ARE REQUIRED THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY PERSONS SHALL BE LAID OFF IN ORDER OF THE MOST RECENT DISPOSITION; K. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WITH A CURRENT STATUS AS A TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR NOT APPOINTED TO A PERMANENT POSITION IN A SCHOOL FOR A PERI- OD OF SIX MONTHS OR MORE AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ANY CITYWIDE LAYOFF PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION; PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT IF FEWER LAYOFFS ARE REQUIRED THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, LAYOFFS SHALL BE DONE IN ORDER OF PERSONS WHO HAVE BEEN WITHOUT AN APPOINTED POSITION TO A SCHOOL THE LONGEST PERIOD OF TIME; L. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR CONVICTED OF CRIMINAL CHARGES IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS; PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT IF FEWER LAYOFFS ARE REQUIRED THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, LAYOFFS SHALL BE DONE IN ORDER OF THE MOST RECENT CONVICTION; M. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO HAS RECEIVED A FINE AS A PENALTY OR AS PART OF A STIPULATION IN SETTLEMENT OF CHARGES OF CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM OR LATENESS, OR IMPROPER USE OR RECORDING OF LEAVE TIME; PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT IF FEWER LAYOFFS ARE REQUIRED THAN THERE ARE PEOPLE IN THIS CATEGORY, LAYOFFS SHALL BE DONE IN ORDER OF THE MOST RECENT DISPOSITION; N. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS WAS THE SUBJECT OF AN INVESTIGATION WHERE ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT WERE SUBSTANTIATED BY THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SPECIAL COMMISSIONER OF INVESTIGATION, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTI- GATIONS OR THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S OFFICE OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY, PROVIDED HOWEVER IF THERE ARE FEWER LAYOFFS THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, LAYOFFS SHALL BE DONE IN ORDER OF THE MOST RECENT INVES- TIGATION OF SUBSTANTIATED ALLEGATIONS; O. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO HAS FAILED TO FULFILL ALL THE REQUIREMENTS FOR STATE CERTIFICATION AS OF AUGUST THIRTY-FIRST OF THE SCHOOL YEAR IN WHICH THERE IS A CITYWIDE LAYOFF, PROVIDED HOWEVER IF THERE ARE FEWER LAYOFFS THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, TEACH- ERS WHO HAVE BEEN WITHOUT FULL CERTIFICATION FROM THE DEPARTMENT THE LONGEST SHALL BE LAID OFF FIRST; P. EXCEPT FOR TEACHERS WHO WORK IN LICENSES RELATED TO TEACHING CHIL- DREN WITH DISABILITIES OR SPECIAL NEEDS, ANY TEACHER, WHO FOR TWO YEARS OR MORE, RANKED IN THE BOTTOM THIRTY PERCENT OF ALL TEACHERS IN STUDENT TEST SCORES PROGRESS AS MEASURED BY THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S VALUE-AD- DED ASSESSMENT, PROVIDED HOWEVER, IF THERE ARE FEWER LAYOFFS THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, TEACHERS WITH THE LOWEST SCORES SHALL BE LAID OFF FIRST; AND Q. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO ENTERED AN AGREEMENT TO SERVE AN ADDITIONAL PROBATIONARY YEAR PURSUANT TO SECTION TWENTY-FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY-THREE OF THIS ARTICLE, FOR THE SCHOOL YEAR PRECEDING A CITYWIDE LAYOFF, PROVIDED HOWEVER, IF THERE ARE FEWER LAYOFFS THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WITH THE MOST NUMBER OF ABSENCES SHALL BE LAID OFF FIRST. (III) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, IN THE CASE THAT THE NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS THAT ARE ABOLISHED, OR THE NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES THAT ARE LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF PARAGRAPH S. 3501 5 (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION IS FEWER THAN THE NUMBER OF SUCH POSITIONS THAT MUST BE ABOLISHED OR REDUCED, THE DECISION CONCERNING WHICH ADDITIONAL POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED, AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSI- TIONS ARE TO BE LAID OFF, SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SUBPARA- GRAPH. (1) THE BOARD OF REGENTS SHALL PROMULGATE REGULATIONS PRESCRIBING HOW SUCH ADDITIONAL LAYOFFS SHALL BE EFFECTUATED. THE PROMULGATION OF ANY SUCH REGULATION SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT OF POSI- TIONS OR PERSONS TO BE LAID OFF OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT THE PROMULGA- TION OF ANY SUCH REGULATION SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE A FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; AND PROVIDED FURTHER THAT ANY SUCH REGULATIONS MUST ENSURE THAT IN A HIGH-NEED SCHOOL THE NUMBER OF STAFF LAID OFF SHALL NOT EXCEED THE PERCENTAGE OF THE OVERALL NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN THE SCHOOL THAT REPRES- ENTS HALF OF THE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF STAFF LAID OFF CITYWIDE; PROVIDED HOWEVER, SAID PERCENTAGE MAY BE EXCEEDED WHERE THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT CHOOSES TO ABOLISH ALL POSITIONS IN A LICENSE AREA PURSUANT TO SUBPARA- GRAPH (IV) OF THIS PARAGRAPH. SAID PERCENTAGES SHALL BE CALCULATED EXCLUDING ANY TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPHS (I) AND (II) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, A HIGH-NEED SCHOOL SHALL BE DEFINED AS A SCHOOL IN WHICH AT LEAST NINETY PERCENT OF THE ENROLLED STUDENTS ARE ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS FOR THE FREE AND REDUCED PRICE LUNCH PROGRAM. (2) SHOULD THE BOARD OF REGENTS FAIL TO PROMULGATE REGULATIONS NO LATER THAN SEVENTY-FIVE DAYS PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF A CITYWIDE LAYOFF, THE BUILDING PRINCIPAL SHALL DETERMINE WHICH ADDITIONAL POSI- TIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED, AND WHICH ADDITIONAL PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS ARE TO BE LAID OFF CONSISTENT WITH GUIDANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR. THE PRINCIPAL SHALL MAKE THE DECISION AFTER CONSIDERING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF A SCHOOL-BASED COMMITTEE COMPRISED OF TEACHERS, ADMINISTRATORS AND PARENTS. THE FOLLOWING FACTORS SHALL BE CONSIDERED IN DETERMINING WHICH POSITIONS SHALL BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS ARE TO BE LAID OFF: (I) SCHOOL NEEDS FOR PARTICULAR LICENSE AREAS; AND (II) WHEN MORE THAN ONE PERSON HOLDS A POSITION WITHIN THE SAME LICENSE AREA, SIGNIFICANT RELEVANT CONTRIB- UTIONS, ACCOMPLISHMENTS, OR PERFORMANCE OF EACH SUCH PERSON; RELEVANT SUPPLEMENTAL PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCES OF EACH SUCH PERSON AS DEMON- STRATED ON THE JOB; OFFICE OR SCHOOL NEEDS, INCLUDING CURRICULUM SPECIALIZED EDUCATION, DEGREES, LICENSES OR AREAS OF EXPERTISE; AND LENGTH OF SATISFACTORY SERVICE BY EACH SUCH PERSON. ANY SUCH GUIDANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT OF POSITIONS OR PERSONS TO BE LAID OFF OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT THE PROMUL- GATION OF ANY SUCH GUIDANCE SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE A FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; AND S. 3501 6 PROVIDED FURTHER THAT ANY SUCH GUIDANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR MUST ENSURE THAT IN A HIGH-NEED SCHOOL THE NUMBER OF STAFF LAID OFF SHALL NOT EXCEED THE PERCENTAGE OF THE OVERALL NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN THE SCHOOL THAT REPRESENTS HALF OF THE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF STAFF LAID OFF CITYWIDE, PROVIDED HOWEVER, SAID PERCENTAGE MAY BE EXCEEDED WHERE THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT CHOOSES TO ABOLISH ALL POSITIONS IN A LICENSE AREA PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (IV) OF THIS PARAGRAPH. SAID PERCENTAGES SHALL BE CALCULATED EXCLUDING ANY TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPHS (I) AND (II) OF THIS PARAGRAPH. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, A HIGH-NEED SCHOOL SHALL BE DEFINED AS A SCHOOL IN WHICH AT LEAST NINETY PERCENT OF THE ENROLLED STUDENTS ARE ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS FOR THE FREE AND REDUCED PRICE LUNCH PROGRAM. (IV) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, ANY REGULATION PROMULGATED BY THE BOARD OF REGENTS OR ANY LOCALLY DEVELOPED PROCESS PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE FOUR- TEEN OF THE CIVIL SERVICE LAW, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT SHALL NOT BE PROHIBITED FROM ABOLISHING ALL POSITIONS IN AN ENTIRE LICENSE AREA PURSUANT TO GUIDANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR. (B) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND ITS EMPLOYEES' COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGENTS SHALL ESTABLISH A PROCEDURE GOVERNING THE ABOLISHMENT OR REDUCTION OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS AT INDIVIDUAL SCHOOLS IN ORDER TO MEET SCHOOL BUDGETARY NEEDS, REORGANIZE FUNCTIONS, OR FOR OTHER COMPELLING REASONS OUTSIDE OF A CITYWIDE REDUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION, PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE FOURTEEN OF THE CIVIL SERVICE LAW. ANY SUCH LOCALLY ESTABLISHED PROCESS SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED; PROVIDED HOWEVER THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT OF POSITIONS OR PERSONS TO BE EXCESSED OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT THE PROMULGATION OF ANY SUCH REGULATION SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE A FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED. FOR POSITIONS COVERED BY SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWELVE-C OF THIS CHAPTER, ANY SUCH LOCALLY DEVELOPED PROCESS SHALL BE BASED ON THE ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR TEACHERS AND SUPERVISORS PURSUANT TO SUCH SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWELVE-C AND ITS IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS. UNTIL AND UNLESS SUCH A PROCESS HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED AT LEAST NINETY DAYS BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHOOL YEAR, THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY: (I) DECISIONS CONCERNING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SAME PROCESS PRESCRIBED FOR MAKING LAYOFF DECISIONS SET FORTH IN SUBPARAGRAPHS (I) AND (II) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION. IN THE CASE THAT THE NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EXCESSED IS FEWER THAN THE NUMBER OF SUCH POSITIONS THAT MUST BE EXCESSED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBPARAGRAPH, THE BOARD OF REGENTS SHALL PROMULGATE REGULATIONS ESTABLISHING THE PROCESS TO BE USED TO DETERMINE WHICH POSITIONS SHALL BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED. THE PROMULGATION OF ANY SUCH REGULATION SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED; PROVIDED HOWEVER THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT OF POSITIONS OR PERSONS TO BE S. 3501 7 EXCESSED OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT THE PROMULGATION OF ANY SUCH REGU- LATION SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE A FACTOR IN ANY DECI- SION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED. SHOULD THE BOARD OF REGENTS FAIL TO PROMULGATE REGULATIONS NO LATER THAN SEVENTY-FIVE DAYS PRIOR TO THE FIRST DAY OF THE SCHOOL YEAR, THE BUILDING PRINCIPAL SHALL DETERMINE WHICH TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS ARE TO BE EXCESSED, CONSISTENT WITH GUID- ANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR PURSUANT TO THIS SUBDIVISION. THE PRINCIPAL SHALL MAKE THE DECISION AFTER CONSIDERING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF A SCHOOL-BASED COMMITTEE COMPRISED OF TEACHERS, ADMINISTRATORS AND PARENTS. THE FOLLOWING FACTORS SHALL BE CONSIDERED IN DETERMINING WHICH POSITIONS SHALL BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS ARE TO BE EXCESSED: (1) SCHOOL NEEDS FOR PARTICULAR LICENSE AREAS; AND (2) WHEN MORE THAN ONE PERSON HOLDS A POSITION WITHIN THE SAME LICENSE AREA: SIGNIFICANT RELEVANT CONTRIBUTIONS, ACCOMPLISHMENTS, OR PERFORM- ANCE OF EACH SUCH PERSON; RELEVANT SUPPLEMENTAL PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCES OF EACH SUCH PERSON AS DEMONSTRATED ON THE JOB; OFFICE OR SCHOOL NEEDS, INCLUDING: CURRICULUM SPECIALIZED EDUCATION, DEGREES, LICENSES OR AREAS OF EXPERTISE; AND LENGTH OF SATISFACTORY SERVICE BY EACH SUCH PERSON. ANY SUCH GUIDANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPY- ING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT OF POSITIONS OR PERSONS TO BE EXCESSED OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT THE PROMULGATION OF ANY SUCH GUIDANCE SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE A FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF. SHOULD CITYWIDE LAYOFFS IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION BE CARRIED OUT, A DETERMINATION OF WHETHER ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR SHALL BE LAID OFF WHOSE POSITION HAS BEEN ABOLISHED AND IS IN EXCESS FROM A REGULARLY APPOINTED POSITION IN THE DISTRICT FOR LESS THAN SIX MONTHS, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SUBPAR- AGRAPHS (I) AND (II) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION. S 4. Subdivision 4 of section 2588 of the education law is REPEALED and a new subdivision 4 is added to read as follows: 4. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND ITS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGENTS SHALL ESTABLISH A PROCEDURE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTI- CLE FOURTEEN OF THE CIVIL SERVICE LAW GOVERNING THE RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES TO RETURN TO VACANT POSITIONS IN THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT. UNTIL AND UNLESS A LOCALLY ESTABLISHED PROCEDURE IS ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE FOURTEEN OF THE CIVIL SERVICE LAW, THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY CONCERNING THE RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES TO RETURN TO VACANT POSI- TIONS. WHENEVER A TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITION IS ABOLISHED PURSU- ANT TO CLAUSES ONE AND TWO OF SUBPARAGRAPH (III) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION, SHOULD A VACANCY OCCUR IN THE SAME POSITION AT THE SAME SCHOOL OR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE DATE WHEN THE POSITION WAS ABOLISHED, THE PRINCIPAL, OR THE CHANCEL- LOR OR HIS OR HER DESIGNEE, SHALL OFFER THE POSITION TO THE PERSON WHO HELD THE POSITION BEFORE IT WAS ABOLISHED. IF THE PERSON REJECTS THE OFFER, OR FAILS TO RESPOND TO THE OFFER WITHIN THIRTY DAYS, THE PERSON SHALL NO LONGER HAVE A RIGHT TO RETURN TO THE POSITION. IF MORE THAN ONE POSITION WAS ABOLISHED IN THE SAME LICENSE AREA AT THE SAME SCHOOL OR S. 3501 8 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, AND THERE ARE FEWER VACANCIES IN THE SAME LICENSE AREA THAN PERSONS WHOSE POSITIONS WERE ABOLISHED, THE PRINCIPAL, OR THE CHANCELLOR, SHALL HAVE THE DISCRETION TO DETERMINE WHICH PERSON SHOULD BE OFFERED THE POSITION FIRST. THE CHANCELLOR SHALL PROMULGATE GUIDANCE TO DETERMINE THE RIGHT OF RETURN OF ANY TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (IV) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION AND CLAUSE ONE OF SUBPARAGRAPH (II) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION, SHALL HAVE NO RIGHTS TO RETURN TO A VACANT POSITION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION. S 5. Subdivision 7 of section 2588 of the education law is REPEALED. S 6. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, section or part of this act shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid and after exhaustion of all further judicial review, the judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, para- graph, section or part of this act directly involved in the controversy in which the judgment shall have been rendered. S 7. This act shall take effect immediately.
2011-S3501A - Details
- Current Committee:
- Senate Education
- Law Section:
- Education Law
- Laws Affected:
- Amd ยง2588, rpld & add subs 3 & 4, rpld sub 7, Ed L
2011-S3501A - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 3501--A 2011-2012 Regular Sessions I N S E N A T E February 23, 2011 ___________ Introduced by Sen. FLANAGAN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Education -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the education law, in relation to retaining quality teachers and teachers in shortage subject areas when teaching posi- tions are eliminated in city school districts of cities having one million or more inhabitants; and to repeal certain provisions of such law relating thereto THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "keep effective and excellent professionals in the classroom act". S 2. The section heading of section 2588 of the education law, as added by chapter 521 of the laws of 1976, is amended to read as follows: Seniority, retention and displacement rights in connection with aboli- tion of positions in city school districts of cities having [more than] one million inhabitants OR MORE. S 3. Subdivision 3 of section 2588 of the education law is REPEALED and a new subdivision 3 is added to read as follows: 3. (A) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND ITS EMPLOYEES' COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGENTS SHALL ESTABLISH A PROCEDURE GOVERNING THE ABOLISHMENT OR REDUCTION OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS CITYWIDE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE FOURTEEN OF THE CIVIL SERVICE LAW. ANY SUCH LOCALLY ESTABLISHED PROCESS SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT OF POSITIONS OR PERSONS TO BE LAID OFF OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD09505-10-1
S. 3501--A 2 BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT ANY SUCH LOCALLY ESTABLISHED PROCESS SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE A FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; AND PROVIDED FURTHER THAT ANY SUCH LOCALLY ESTABLISHED PROCESS MUST ENSURE THAT HIGH QUALITY TEACHERS IN HIGH-NEED SCHOOLS ARE NOT LAID OFF AND THAT HIGH-NEED SCHOOLS DO NOT BEAR A DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE OF WORKFORCE REDUCTIONS PURSUANT TO A CITYWIDE LAYOFF, PROVIDED HOWEVER, NOTHING SHALL PROHIBIT THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM ABOLISHING ALL POSITIONS IN A LICENSE AREA PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (IV) OF THIS PARAGRAPH. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, A HIGH-NEED SCHOOL SHALL BE DEFINED AS A SCHOOL IN WHICH AT LEAST NINETY PERCENT OF THE ENROLLED STUDENTS ARE ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS FOR THE FREE AND REDUCED PRICE LUNCH PROGRAM. FOR POSITIONS COVERED BY SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWELVE-C OF THIS CHAPTER, ANY SUCH LOCALLY DEVELOPED PROCESS SHALL BE BASED ON THE ANNUAL PROFES- SIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR TEACHERS AND SUPERVISORS PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWELVE-C OF THIS CHAPTER AND ITS IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS. UNTIL AND UNLESS SUCH A PROCESS HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED AT LEAST NINETY DAYS BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ANY SUCH ABOLISHMENT OR REDUCTION OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS CITYWIDE, THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY: (I) THE FOLLOWING TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS SHALL BE LAID OFF PRIOR TO ANY OTHER TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS: (A) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO RECEIVED A RATING OF "UNSATISFACTORY" ON HIS OR HER ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW IN THE LAST FIVE SCHOOL YEARS OR "INEFFECTIVE" IN THE EVENT A NEW ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWELVE-C OF THIS CHAPTER; (B) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR, IF THE PERSON IS A TENURED EMPLOYEE, WHO WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS HAS BEEN FINED OR SUSPENDED WITHOUT PAY AS A PENALTY IMPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWENTY-A OF THIS CHAPTER OR AS A RESULT OF A SETTLEMENT OF CHARGES BROUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWENTY-A OF THIS CHAPTER; (C) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR NOT CURRENTLY APPOINTED TO A REGULAR POSITION IN A SCHOOL FOR A PERIOD OF SIX MONTHS OR MORE AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ANY CITYWIDE LAYOFF PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION; (D) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR CONVICTED OF A QUALIFYING CRIMINAL OFFENSE IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS. "QUALIFYING CRIMINAL OFFENSE" SHALL MEAN: (1) ANY FELONY, ANY CLASS A MISDEMEANOR, OR ANY OFFENSE UNDER ARTICLE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE, ONE HUNDRED FORTY, ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED TWENTY, TWO HUNDRED THIRTY, TWO HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-THREE OR TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE OF THE PENAL LAW, OR A FELONY OR MISDEMEANOR UNDER SECTIONS ELEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-TWO AND ELEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-THREE OF THE VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW, OR (2) ANY OFFENSE IN ANY OTHER JURISDICTION FOR WHICH A SENTENCE TO A TERM OF IMPRISONMENT OF ONE YEAR OR OF MORE THAN ONE YEAR WAS AUTHORIZED AND IS AUTHORIZED IN THIS STATE IRRESPECTIVE OF WHETHER SUCH SENTENCE WAS IMPOSED, OR (3) ANY OFFENSE IN ANY OTHER JURISDICTION THE COMMISSION OF WHICH CONSTITUTES THE SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENT OF ANY OFFENSE UNDER ARTI- CLE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE, ONE HUNDRED FORTY, ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED TWENTY, TWO HUNDRED THIRTY, TWO HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-THREE OR TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE OF THE PENAL LAW OR A FELONY OR MISDEMEANOR UNDER SECTIONS ELEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-TWO AND ELEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-THREE OF THE VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW; (E) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVI- SOR, IF THE PERSON IS A TENURED EMPLOYEE, WHO WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS HAS BEEN FINED AS A PENALTY IMPOSED PURSUANT TO CHARGES RELATED TO S. 3501--A 3 CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM, CHRONIC LATENESS, OR IMPROPER USE OR RECORDING OF LEAVE TIME OR AS A RESULT OF SETTLEMENT OF CHARGES BROUGHT PURSUANT TO CHARGES RELATED TO CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM, CHRONIC LATENESS OR IMPROPER USE OR RECORDING OF LEAVE TIME; (F) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS WAS THE SUBJECT OF AN INVESTIGATION WHERE ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT WERE SUBSTANTIATED BY THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SPECIAL COMMISSIONER OF INVESTIGATION, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS OR THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S OFFICE OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY; (G) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO HAS FAILED TO FULFILL ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATION FROM THE DEPARTMENT AS OF AUGUST THIRTY- FIRST OF THE YEAR IN WHICH THERE IS A CITYWIDE LAYOFF; (H) ANY TEACHER, FOR TWO YEARS OR MORE, RANKED IN THE BOTTOM THIRTY PERCENT OF TEACHERS IN STUDENT TEST SCORES PROGRESS AS MEASURED BY THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S VALUE-ADDED ASSESSMENT EXCEPT FOR TEACHERS WHO WORK IN LICENSES SPECIFIC TO TEACHING CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES OR SPECIAL NEEDS. VALUE-ADDED ASSESSMENTS SHALL CONTROL FOR FACTORS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE STUDENT STATUS OR WHOLE CLASS AVERAGE IN THE FOLLOW- ING CATEGORIES: PREVIOUS ACADEMIC OUTCOMES, FREE AND REDUCED PRICE LUNCH STATUS, ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER STATUS, SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS, PREVIOUS SUSPENSIONS AND ABSENCES, GRADE-LEVEL RETENTION, SUMMER SCHOOL PARTICIPATION, YEARS ATTENDING THE CURRENT SCHOOL, ETHNICITY, GENDER, AND CLASS SIZE; AND (I) TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO ENTERED AGREEMENTS TO SERVE AN ADDITIONAL YEAR AS A PROBATIONER PURSUANT TO SECTION TWEN- TY-FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY-THREE OF THIS ARTICLE FOR THE SCHOOL YEAR PRECEDING A CITYWIDE LAYOFF. (II) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, IN THE CASE THAT THE NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS THAT ARE ABOLISHED, OR THE NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES THAT ARE LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARA- GRAPH IS GREATER THAN THE NUMBER OF SUCH POSITIONS THAT MUST BE ABOL- ISHED OR REDUCED AS A RESULT OF A CITYWIDE LAYOFF, THEN THE DECISION CONCERNING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED, AND WHICH PERSONS OCCU- PYING SUCH POSITIONS ARE TO BE LAID OFF, SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SUBPARAGRAPH. (1) THE FOLLOWING PROTOCOL SHALL BE USED UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE TOTAL NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES IDENTIFIED IS EQUAL TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS ABOLISHED. FOR PURPOSES OF THE PROTO- COL, THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL BE RANKED ALPHA- BETICALLY (A) THROUGH (I), PROVIDED THAT (A) SHALL BE RANKED THE HIGHEST PRIORITY AND (I) SHALL BE RANKED THE LOWEST PRIORITY. THE PROTOCOL SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AS FOLLOWS: A. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL IN ALL NINE OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH; B. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN EIGHT OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIOR- ITY OF THOSE EIGHT CATEGORIES; C. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN SEVEN OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIOR- ITY OF THOSE SEVEN CATEGORIES; D. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN SIX OF THE CATEGORIES LIST- ED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARA- S. 3501--A 4 GRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIORITY OF THOSE SIX CATEGORIES; E. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN FIVE OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIOR- ITY OF THOSE FIVE CATEGORIES; F. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN FOUR OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIOR- ITY OF THOSE FOUR CATEGORIES; G. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN THREE OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIOR- ITY OF THOSE THREE CATEGORIES; H. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN TWO OF THE CATEGORIES LIST- ED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARA- GRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIORITY OF THOSE TWO CATEGORIES; I. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO RECEIVED A RATING OF "UNSATISFACTORY" IN ANY OF THE LAST FIVE SCHOOL YEARS ON THEIR ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW; PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT IF FEWER LAYOFFS ARE REQUIRED THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, LAYOFFS SHALL BE DONE IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER: I. A TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WITH THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF UNSATISFACTORY RATINGS IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS; AND II. A TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WITH AN UNSATISFACTORY RATING RECEIVED IN THE MOST RECENT YEAR OR YEARS; J. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR, IF THE PERSON IS A TENURED EMPLOYEE, WHO WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS HAS BEEN FINED OR SUSPENDED WITHOUT PAY AS A PENALTY IMPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWENTY-A OF THIS CHAPTER OR AS A RESULT OF A SETTLEMENT OF CHARGES BROUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWENTY-A OF THIS CHAPTER; PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT IF FEWER LAYOFFS ARE REQUIRED THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY PERSONS SHALL BE LAID OFF IN ORDER OF THE MOST RECENT DISPOSITION; K. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WITH A CURRENT STATUS AS A TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR NOT APPOINTED TO A PERMANENT POSITION IN A SCHOOL FOR A PERI- OD OF SIX MONTHS OR MORE AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ANY CITYWIDE LAYOFF PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION; PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT IF FEWER LAYOFFS ARE REQUIRED THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, LAYOFFS SHALL BE DONE IN ORDER OF PERSONS WHO HAVE BEEN WITHOUT AN APPOINTED POSITION TO A SCHOOL THE LONGEST PERIOD OF TIME; L. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR CONVICTED OF A QUALIFYING CRIMINAL OFFENSE IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS. "QUALIFYING CRIMINAL OFFENSE" SHALL MEAN: (A) ANY FELONY, ANY CLASS A MISDEMEANOR, OR ANY OFFENSE UNDER ARTICLE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE, ONE HUNDRED FORTY, ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED TWENTY, TWO HUNDRED THIRTY, TWO HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-THREE OR TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE OF THE PENAL LAW, OR (B) ANY OFFENSE IN ANY OTHER JURISDICTION FOR WHICH A SENTENCE TO A TERM OF IMPRISONMENT OF ONE YEAR OR OF MORE THAN ONE YEAR WAS AUTHORIZED AND IS AUTHORIZED IN THIS STATE IRRESPECTIVE OF WHETHER SUCH SENTENCE WAS IMPOSED, OR (C) ANY OFFENSE IN ANY OTHER JURISDICTION THE COMMISSION OF WHICH CONSTITUTES THE SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENT OF ANY OFFENSE UNDER ARTI- CLE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE, ONE HUNDRED FORTY, ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED TWENTY, TWO HUNDRED THIRTY, TWO HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY, TWO HUNDRED S. 3501--A 5 SIXTY-THREE OR TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE OF THE PENAL LAW OR A FELONY OR MISDEMEANOR UNDER SECTIONS ELEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-TWO AND ELEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-THREE OF THE VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW; PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT IF FEWER LAYOFFS ARE REQUIRED THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, LAYOFFS SHALL BE DONE IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER: I. A TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR CONVICTED OF A FELONY IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS; AND II. A TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR CONVICTED OF A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS; AND III. A TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR CONVICTED IN THE MOST RECENT YEAR OR YEARS OF A CLASS B MISDEMEANOR UNDER ARTICLE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE, ONE HUNDRED FORTY, ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED TWENTY, TWO HUNDRED THIRTY, TWO HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-THREE OR TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE OF THE PENAL LAW OR A FELONY OR MISDEMEANOR UNDER SECTIONS ELEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-TWO AND ELEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-THREE OF THE VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW; M. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO HAS RECEIVED A FINE AS A PENALTY OR AS PART OF A STIPULATION IN SETTLEMENT OF CHARGES OF CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM OR LATENESS, OR IMPROPER USE OR RECORDING OF LEAVE TIME; PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT IF FEWER LAYOFFS ARE REQUIRED THAN THERE ARE PEOPLE IN THIS CATEGORY, LAYOFFS SHALL BE DONE IN ORDER OF THE MOST RECENT DISPOSITION; N. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS WAS THE SUBJECT OF AN INVESTIGATION WHERE ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT WERE SUBSTANTIATED BY THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SPECIAL COMMISSIONER OF INVESTIGATION, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTI- GATIONS OR THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S OFFICE OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY, PROVIDED HOWEVER IF THERE ARE FEWER LAYOFFS THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, LAYOFFS SHALL BE DONE IN ORDER OF THE MOST RECENT INVES- TIGATION OF SUBSTANTIATED ALLEGATIONS; O. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO HAS FAILED TO FULFILL ALL THE REQUIREMENTS FOR STATE CERTIFICATION AS OF AUGUST THIRTY-FIRST OF THE SCHOOL YEAR IN WHICH THERE IS A CITYWIDE LAYOFF, PROVIDED HOWEVER IF THERE ARE FEWER LAYOFFS THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, TEACH- ERS WHO HAVE BEEN WITHOUT FULL CERTIFICATION FROM THE DEPARTMENT THE LONGEST SHALL BE LAID OFF FIRST; P. ANY TEACHER, FOR TWO YEARS OR MORE, RANKED IN THE BOTTOM THIRTY PERCENT OF TEACHERS IN STUDENT TEST SCORES PROGRESS AS MEASURED BY THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S VALUE-ADDED ASSESSMENT EXCEPT FOR TEACHERS WHO WORK IN LICENSES SPECIFIC TO TEACHING CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES OR SPECIAL NEEDS. VALUE-ADDED ASSESSMENTS SHALL CONTROL FOR FACTORS INCLUD- ING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE STUDENT STATUS OR WHOLE CLASS AVERAGE IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES: PREVIOUS ACADEMIC OUTCOMES, FREE AND REDUCED PRICE LUNCH STATUS, ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER STATUS, SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS, PREVIOUS SUSPENSIONS AND ABSENCES, GRADE-LEVEL RETENTION, SUMMER SCHOOL PARTICIPATION, YEARS ATTENDING THE CURRENT SCHOOL, ETHNICITY, GENDER, AND CLASS SIZE, PROVIDED HOWEVER, IF THERE ARE FEWER LAYOFFS THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, TEACHERS WITH THE LOWEST SCORES SHALL BE LAID OFF FIRST; AND Q. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO ENTERED AN AGREEMENT TO SERVE AN ADDITIONAL PROBATIONARY YEAR PURSUANT TO SECTION TWENTY-FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY-THREE OF THIS ARTICLE, FOR THE SCHOOL YEAR PRECEDING A CITYWIDE LAYOFF, PROVIDED HOWEVER, IF THERE ARE FEWER LAYOFFS THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WITH THE MOST NUMBER OF ABSENCES SHALL BE LAID OFF FIRST. S. 3501--A 6 (III) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, IN THE CASE THAT THE NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS THAT ARE ABOLISHED, OR THE NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES THAT ARE LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION IS FEWER THAN THE NUMBER OF SUCH POSITIONS THAT MUST BE ABOLISHED OR REDUCED, THE DECISION CONCERNING WHICH ADDITIONAL POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED, AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSI- TIONS ARE TO BE LAID OFF, SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SUBPARA- GRAPH. (1) THE BOARD OF REGENTS SHALL PROMULGATE REGULATIONS PRESCRIBING HOW SUCH ADDITIONAL LAYOFFS SHALL BE EFFECTUATED. THE PROMULGATION OF ANY SUCH REGULATION SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT OF POSI- TIONS OR PERSONS TO BE LAID OFF OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT THE PROMULGA- TION OF ANY SUCH REGULATION SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE A FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; AND PROVIDED FURTHER THAT ANY SUCH REGULATIONS MUST ENSURE THAT IN A HIGH-NEED SCHOOL THE NUMBER OF STAFF LAID OFF SHALL NOT EXCEED THE PERCENTAGE OF THE OVERALL NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN THE SCHOOL THAT REPRES- ENTS HALF OF THE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF STAFF LAID OFF CITYWIDE; PROVIDED HOWEVER, SAID PERCENTAGE MAY BE EXCEEDED WHERE THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT CHOOSES TO ABOLISH ALL POSITIONS IN A LICENSE AREA PURSUANT TO SUBPARA- GRAPH (IV) OF THIS PARAGRAPH. SAID PERCENTAGES SHALL BE CALCULATED EXCLUDING ANY TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPHS (I) AND (II) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, A HIGH-NEED SCHOOL SHALL BE DEFINED AS A SCHOOL IN WHICH AT LEAST NINETY PERCENT OF THE ENROLLED STUDENTS ARE ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS FOR THE FREE AND REDUCED PRICE LUNCH PROGRAM. (2) SHOULD THE BOARD OF REGENTS FAIL TO PROMULGATE REGULATIONS NO LATER THAN SEVENTY-FIVE DAYS PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF A CITYWIDE LAYOFF, THE BUILDING PRINCIPAL SHALL DETERMINE WHICH ADDITIONAL POSI- TIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED, AND WHICH ADDITIONAL PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS ARE TO BE LAID OFF CONSISTENT WITH GUIDANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR. THE PRINCIPAL SHALL MAKE THE DECISION AFTER CONSIDERING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF A SCHOOL-BASED COMMITTEE COMPRISED OF TEACHERS, ADMINISTRATORS AND PARENTS. THE FOLLOWING FACTORS SHALL BE CONSIDERED IN DETERMINING WHICH POSITIONS SHALL BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS ARE TO BE LAID OFF: (I) SCHOOL NEEDS FOR PARTICULAR LICENSE AREAS; AND (II) WHEN MORE THAN ONE PERSON HOLDS A POSITION WITHIN THE SAME LICENSE AREA, SIGNIFICANT RELEVANT CONTRIB- UTIONS, ACCOMPLISHMENTS, OR PERFORMANCE OF EACH SUCH PERSON; RELEVANT SUPPLEMENTAL PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCES OF EACH SUCH PERSON AS DEMON- STRATED ON THE JOB; OFFICE OR SCHOOL NEEDS, INCLUDING CURRICULUM SPECIALIZED EDUCATION, DEGREES, LICENSES OR AREAS OF EXPERTISE; AND LENGTH OF SATISFACTORY SERVICE BY EACH SUCH PERSON. ANY SUCH GUIDANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT OF POSITIONS OR PERSONS TO BE LAID OFF OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY S. 3501--A 7 BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT THE PROMUL- GATION OF ANY SUCH GUIDANCE SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE A FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; AND PROVIDED FURTHER THAT ANY SUCH GUIDANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR MUST ENSURE THAT IN A HIGH-NEED SCHOOL THE NUMBER OF STAFF LAID OFF SHALL NOT EXCEED THE PERCENTAGE OF THE OVERALL NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN THE SCHOOL THAT REPRESENTS HALF OF THE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF STAFF LAID OFF CITYWIDE, PROVIDED HOWEVER, SAID PERCENTAGE MAY BE EXCEEDED WHERE THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT CHOOSES TO ABOLISH ALL POSITIONS IN A LICENSE AREA PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (IV) OF THIS PARAGRAPH. SAID PERCENTAGES SHALL BE CALCULATED EXCLUDING ANY TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPHS (I) AND (II) OF THIS PARAGRAPH. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, A HIGH-NEED SCHOOL SHALL BE DEFINED AS A SCHOOL IN WHICH AT LEAST NINETY PERCENT OF THE ENROLLED STUDENTS ARE ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS FOR THE FREE AND REDUCED PRICE LUNCH PROGRAM. (IV) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, ANY REGULATION PROMULGATED BY THE BOARD OF REGENTS OR ANY LOCALLY DEVELOPED PROCESS PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE FOUR- TEEN OF THE CIVIL SERVICE LAW, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT SHALL NOT BE PROHIBITED FROM ABOLISHING ALL POSITIONS IN AN ENTIRE LICENSE AREA PURSUANT TO GUIDANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR. (B) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND ITS EMPLOYEES' COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGENTS SHALL ESTABLISH A PROCEDURE GOVERNING THE ABOLISHMENT OR REDUCTION OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS AT INDIVIDUAL SCHOOLS IN ORDER TO MEET SCHOOL BUDGETARY NEEDS, REORGANIZE FUNCTIONS, OR FOR OTHER COMPELLING REASONS OUTSIDE OF A CITYWIDE REDUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION, PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE FOURTEEN OF THE CIVIL SERVICE LAW. ANY SUCH LOCALLY ESTABLISHED PROCESS SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED; PROVIDED HOWEVER THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT OF POSITIONS OR PERSONS TO BE EXCESSED OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT THE PROMULGATION OF ANY SUCH REGULATION SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE A FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED. FOR POSITIONS COVERED BY SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWELVE-C OF THIS CHAPTER, ANY SUCH LOCALLY DEVELOPED PROCESS SHALL BE BASED ON THE ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR TEACHERS AND SUPERVISORS PURSUANT TO SUCH SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWELVE-C AND ITS IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS. UNTIL AND UNLESS SUCH A PROCESS HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED AT LEAST NINETY DAYS BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHOOL YEAR, THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY: (I) DECISIONS CONCERNING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SAME PROCESS PRESCRIBED FOR MAKING LAYOFF DECISIONS SET FORTH IN SUBPARAGRAPHS (I) AND (II) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION. IN THE CASE THAT THE NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EXCESSED IS FEWER THAN THE NUMBER OF SUCH POSITIONS THAT MUST BE EXCESSED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBPARAGRAPH, THE BOARD OF REGENTS SHALL PROMULGATE REGULATIONS ESTABLISHING THE PROCESS TO BE USED TO DETERMINE WHICH POSITIONS SHALL BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED. THE PROMULGATION OF ANY SUCH REGULATION SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR S. 3501--A 8 IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED; PROVIDED HOWEVER THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT OF POSITIONS OR PERSONS TO BE EXCESSED OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT THE PROMULGATION OF ANY SUCH REGU- LATION SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE A FACTOR IN ANY DECI- SION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED. SHOULD THE BOARD OF REGENTS FAIL TO PROMULGATE REGULATIONS NO LATER THAN SEVENTY-FIVE DAYS PRIOR TO THE FIRST DAY OF THE SCHOOL YEAR, THE BUILDING PRINCIPAL SHALL DETERMINE WHICH TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS ARE TO BE EXCESSED, CONSISTENT WITH GUID- ANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR PURSUANT TO THIS SUBDIVISION. THE PRINCIPAL SHALL MAKE THE DECISION AFTER CONSIDERING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF A SCHOOL-BASED COMMITTEE COMPRISED OF TEACHERS, ADMINISTRATORS AND PARENTS. THE FOLLOWING FACTORS SHALL BE CONSIDERED IN DETERMINING WHICH POSITIONS SHALL BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS ARE TO BE EXCESSED: (1) SCHOOL NEEDS FOR PARTICULAR LICENSE AREAS; AND (2) WHEN MORE THAN ONE PERSON HOLDS A POSITION WITHIN THE SAME LICENSE AREA: SIGNIFICANT RELEVANT CONTRIBUTIONS, ACCOMPLISHMENTS, OR PERFORM- ANCE OF EACH SUCH PERSON; RELEVANT SUPPLEMENTAL PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCES OF EACH SUCH PERSON AS DEMONSTRATED ON THE JOB; OFFICE OR SCHOOL NEEDS, INCLUDING: CURRICULUM SPECIALIZED EDUCATION, DEGREES, LICENSES OR AREAS OF EXPERTISE; AND LENGTH OF SATISFACTORY SERVICE BY EACH SUCH PERSON. ANY SUCH GUIDANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPY- ING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT OF POSITIONS OR PERSONS TO BE EXCESSED OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT THE PROMULGATION OF ANY SUCH GUIDANCE SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE A FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF. SHOULD CITYWIDE LAYOFFS IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION BE CARRIED OUT, A DETERMINATION OF WHETHER ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR SHALL BE LAID OFF WHOSE POSITION HAS BEEN ABOLISHED AND IS IN EXCESS FROM A REGULARLY APPOINTED POSITION IN THE DISTRICT FOR LESS THAN SIX MONTHS, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SUBPAR- AGRAPHS (I) AND (II) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION. S 4. Subdivision 4 of section 2588 of the education law is REPEALED and a new subdivision 4 is added to read as follows: 4. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND ITS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGENTS SHALL ESTABLISH A PROCEDURE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTI- CLE FOURTEEN OF THE CIVIL SERVICE LAW GOVERNING THE RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES TO RETURN TO VACANT POSITIONS IN THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT. UNTIL AND UNLESS A LOCALLY ESTABLISHED PROCEDURE IS ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE FOURTEEN OF THE CIVIL SERVICE LAW, THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY CONCERNING THE RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES TO RETURN TO VACANT POSI- TIONS. WHENEVER A TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITION IS ABOLISHED PURSU- ANT TO CLAUSES ONE AND TWO OF SUBPARAGRAPH (III) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION, SHOULD A VACANCY OCCUR IN THE SAME POSITION AT THE SAME SCHOOL OR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE DATE WHEN THE POSITION WAS ABOLISHED, THE PRINCIPAL, OR THE CHANCEL- LOR OR HIS OR HER DESIGNEE, SHALL OFFER THE POSITION TO THE PERSON WHO S. 3501--A 9 HELD THE POSITION BEFORE IT WAS ABOLISHED. IF THE PERSON REJECTS THE OFFER, OR FAILS TO RESPOND TO THE OFFER WITHIN THIRTY DAYS, THE PERSON SHALL NO LONGER HAVE A RIGHT TO RETURN TO THE POSITION. IF MORE THAN ONE POSITION WAS ABOLISHED IN THE SAME LICENSE AREA AT THE SAME SCHOOL OR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, AND THERE ARE FEWER VACANCIES IN THE SAME LICENSE AREA THAN PERSONS WHOSE POSITIONS WERE ABOLISHED, THE PRINCIPAL, OR THE CHANCELLOR, SHALL HAVE THE DISCRETION TO DETERMINE WHICH PERSON SHOULD BE OFFERED THE POSITION FIRST. THE CHANCELLOR SHALL PROMULGATE GUIDANCE TO DETERMINE THE RIGHT OF RETURN OF ANY TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (IV) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION AND CLAUSE ONE OF SUBPARAGRAPH (II) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION, SHALL HAVE NO RIGHTS TO RETURN TO A VACANT POSITION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION. S 5. Subdivision 7 of section 2588 of the education law is REPEALED. S 6. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, section or part of this act shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid and after exhaustion of all further judicial review, the judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, para- graph, section or part of this act directly involved in the controversy in which the judgment shall have been rendered. S 7. This act shall take effect immediately.
2011-S3501B (ACTIVE) - Details
- Current Committee:
- Senate Education
- Law Section:
- Education Law
- Laws Affected:
- Amd ยง2588, rpld & add subs 3 & 4, rpld sub 7, Ed L
2011-S3501B (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo
BILL NUMBER:S3501B REVISED 02/28/11 TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the education law, in relation to retaining quality teachers and teachers in shortage subject areas when teaching positions are eliminated in city school districts of cities having one million or more inhabitants; and to repeal certain provisions of such law relating thereto PURPOSE OF THE BILL: This bill would create a default layoff mechanism in New York city in effect unless and until such time as the city of New York and its teachers! union collectively bargain new layoff procedures. Decision-making based solely on seniority would be prohibited in any bargaining agreement. SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section 1: Title. Section 2: A technical change to section 2588 of the education law to change "more than one million inhabitants" to "one million
inhabitants or more". Section 3: requires the city school district and its employee collective bargaining agents to establish a procedure governing the abolishment or reduction of teaching or supervisory positions citywide pursuant to article 14 of the civil service law. An employee's length of service can no longer be the sole factor in determining which positions to abolish. In addition, this section ensures that high need schools (schools with greater than 90 percent eligibility for free and reduced price lunch) do not bear a disproportionate share of workforce reductions. In the absence of a collective bargaining agreement governing staff reduction a default layoff mechanism for New York City governs any citywide layoff in the following manner: * Seniority is no longer the sole basis for any layoff decision. * The district will first make layoff decisions on a citywide basis, based on specific categories of teachers. Per the provisions of this bill, until such time as the City district and the union collectively bargain a layoff procedure, these category-based layoffs would still be made by license area (English, carpentry, common branch elementary, etc * Under this bill there are nine categories established which constitutes a subset of staff which would in the first instance be laid off until the citywide layoff number is achieved. Staff that fall into multiple categories would be laid off first and then layoffs would proceed through each individual category until such time as the citywide layoff number is achieved. Unless the entire license is eliminated, the following teachers would be laid off first within any given license area: o A - School-based personnel with at least one rating of "unsatisfactory" in the five academic years preceding the year in which layoffs would take effect; o B - A finding of guilt on 3020-a charges without termination in the last five years; o C - Status as school-based personnel without a permanent position for six months or more as of the start of the school year in which layoffs will occur; o D - Any teacher or supervisor convicted of a qualifying criminal offense in the past five years. "Qualifying criminal offense shall mean: (1) any felony, any class A misdemeanor, or any class B misdemeanor under articles one hundred twenty, one hundred thirty, one hundred thirty five, one hundred forty, one hundred fifty five, two hundred twenty, two hundred thirty, two hundred forty five, two hundred sixty, two hundred sixty three or two hundred sixty five of the Penal Law, or a felony or misdemeanor under sections one thousand one hundred ninety two and one thousand one hundred ninety three of the Vehicle and Traffic Law; or (2) Any offense in any other jurisdiction for which a sentence to a term of imprisonment of one year or of more than one year was authorized and is authorized in this state irrespective of whether such sentence was imposed, or (3) Any offense in any other jurisdiction the commission of which constitutes the substantial equivalent of any offense under articles one hundred twenty, one hundred thirty, one hundred thirty five, one hundred forty, one hundred fifty five, two hundred twenty, two hundred thirty, two hundred forty five, two hundred sixty, two hundred sixty three or two hundred sixty five of the Penal Law or a felony or misdemeanor under sections one thousand one hundred ninety two and one thousand one hundred ninety three of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. o E - A finding of excessive or improper lateness or absenteeism without adequate cause or improper use of leave time by a time and attendance arbitrator in the last five years; o F - Investigations by the Special Commissioner of Investigation (SCI), the Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO), or the Office of Special Investigations (OSI) that led to substantiated allegations of misconduct in the last five years; o G - School based personnel who failed to fulfill all requirements for state certification as of August 31 of the year in which layoffs will be enacted; o H - Teachers in grades 4-8 who for two years or more ranked in the bottom thirty percent of all teachers in student test scores progress as measured by the City school district's value added assessment except for teachers who are licensed to teach special education or special needs children. Value added assessments shall control for factors including but not limited to the student status or whole class average in the following categories: previous academic outcomes, free and reduced priced lunch status, English language learner status, special education status, previous absences and suspensions, grade level retention, summer school participation, years attending the current school, ethnicity, gender and class size; and o I - Teachers granted an extension regarding tenure in the year preceding city wide layoff. * When the number of employees laid off by way of the above process is less than the number of total layoffs required, the Regents will promulgate regulations by that date governing the layoffs of any additional teachers, beyond those laid off in the above process. Such regulations must ensure that an employee's length of service is not the sole factor in determining a layoff and that an employee's salary is not a factor in layoff decisions. These additional layoffs need not be made by license category. * In the event the Regents do not promulgate regulations within 75 days of the first day of school, building principals will make additional layoff decisions pursuant to guidance put forth by the Chancellor. The principal shall make the decisions after considering the recommendations of school based committee comprised of teachers, administrators and parents. * In schools where 90 percent of students receive free or reduced-price lunch, layoffs made subsequent to the categories-based layoff process shall not exceed a percentage of the overall number of positions in the school that represents half of the average percentage laid off made subsequent to the categories-based process in schools citywide. This excludes employees in the categories outlined above or employees laid off because of the system-wide elimination of a license area. This requirement would apply to any mechanism that is collectively bargained, promulgated by the Regents or set forth by the Chancellor and implemented by principals. * When schools remove positions for any reason, absent a citywide layoff condition, the sale basis for such decisions will not be employee length of service. This bill requires such a process to be collectively bargained, pursuant to education law 3012-c. In the event it is not collectively bargained by 90 days before the start of the school year, decisions are to be made using all above categories. In the event the number of positions needed to be removed exceeds the number in these categories, the Regents are to promulgate regulations. In the event that by 75 days before the start of the school year, the Regents have not promulgated regulations, principals are to make the decision per guidance issued by the Chancellor. Such regulations or guidance must ensure that employee length of service is not the sale factor in layoff decisions and that salary is not a factor in layoff decisions. Section 4: requires employee rights to return to vacant positions to be collectively bargained. In the absence of a collective bargaining agreement when layoffs are made the following process shall apply: Whenever a teaching or supervisory position is abolished pursuant to the Regents or chancellor and should a vacancy occur in the same position at the same school or administrative office within one year of the date when the position was abolished, the principal, or the chancellor or his or her designee, shall offer the position to the person who held the position before it was abolished. If the person rejects the offer, or fails to respond to the offer within thirty days, the person shall no longer have a right to return to the position. If more than one position was abolished in the same license area at the same school or administrative office, and there are fewer vacancies in the same license area than persons whose positions were abolished, the principal, or the chancellor, shall have the discretion to determine which person should be offered the position first. Teachers or supervisors laid off pursuant to the nine categories outlined above shall have no rights to return to a vacant position pursuant. Section 5: repeals paragraph 7 of section 2588 of the education law which is replaced by language in Section 4. Section 6: Severability. Section 7: Effective date. JUSTIFICATION: This bill will allow high quality teachers to remain in the classroom during years when citywide layoffs are required. PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New bill. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None to the State. EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately.
2011-S3501B (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 3501--B 2011-2012 Regular Sessions I N S E N A T E February 23, 2011 ___________ Introduced by Sen. FLANAGAN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Education -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the education law, in relation to retaining quality teachers and teachers in shortage subject areas when teaching posi- tions are eliminated in city school districts of cities having one million or more inhabitants; and to repeal certain provisions of such law relating thereto THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "keep effective and excellent professionals in the classroom act". S 2. The section heading of section 2588 of the education law, as added by chapter 521 of the laws of 1976, is amended to read as follows: Seniority, retention and displacement rights in connection with aboli- tion of positions in city school districts of cities having [more than] one million inhabitants OR MORE. S 3. Subdivision 3 of section 2588 of the education law is REPEALED and a new subdivision 3 is added to read as follows: 3. (A) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND ITS EMPLOYEES' COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGENTS SHALL ESTABLISH A PROCEDURE GOVERNING THE ABOLISHMENT OR REDUCTION OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS CITYWIDE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE FOURTEEN OF THE CIVIL SERVICE LAW. ANY SUCH LOCALLY ESTABLISHED PROCESS SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD09505-12-1
S. 3501--B 2 OF POSITIONS OR PERSONS TO BE LAID OFF OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT ANY SUCH LOCALLY ESTABLISHED PROCESS SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE A FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; AND PROVIDED FURTHER THAT ANY SUCH LOCALLY ESTABLISHED PROCESS MUST ENSURE THAT HIGH QUALITY TEACHERS IN HIGH-NEED SCHOOLS ARE NOT LAID OFF AND THAT HIGH-NEED SCHOOLS DO NOT BEAR A DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE OF WORKFORCE REDUCTIONS PURSUANT TO A CITYWIDE LAYOFF, PROVIDED HOWEVER, NOTHING SHALL PROHIBIT THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM ABOLISHING ALL POSITIONS IN A LICENSE AREA PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (IV) OF THIS PARAGRAPH. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, A HIGH-NEED SCHOOL SHALL BE DEFINED AS A SCHOOL IN WHICH AT LEAST NINETY PERCENT OF THE ENROLLED STUDENTS ARE ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS FOR THE FREE AND REDUCED PRICE LUNCH PROGRAM. FOR POSITIONS COVERED BY SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWELVE-C OF THIS CHAPTER, ANY SUCH LOCALLY DEVELOPED PROCESS SHALL BE BASED ON THE ANNUAL PROFES- SIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR TEACHERS AND SUPERVISORS PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWELVE-C OF THIS CHAPTER AND ITS IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS. UNTIL AND UNLESS SUCH A PROCESS HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED AT LEAST NINETY DAYS BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ANY SUCH ABOLISHMENT OR REDUCTION OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS CITYWIDE, THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY: (I) THE FOLLOWING TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS SHALL BE LAID OFF PRIOR TO ANY OTHER TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS: (A) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO RECEIVED A RATING OF "UNSATISFACTORY" ON HIS OR HER ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW IN THE LAST FIVE SCHOOL YEARS OR "INEFFECTIVE" IN THE EVENT A NEW ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWELVE-C OF THIS CHAPTER; (B) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR, IF THE PERSON IS A TENURED EMPLOYEE, WHO WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS HAS BEEN FINED OR SUSPENDED WITHOUT PAY AS A PENALTY IMPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWENTY-A OF THIS CHAPTER OR AS A RESULT OF A SETTLEMENT OF CHARGES BROUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWENTY-A OF THIS CHAPTER; (C) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR NOT CURRENTLY APPOINTED TO A REGULAR POSITION IN A SCHOOL FOR A PERIOD OF SIX MONTHS OR MORE AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ANY CITYWIDE LAYOFF PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION; (D) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR CONVICTED OF A QUALIFYING CRIMINAL OFFENSE IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS. "QUALIFYING CRIMINAL OFFENSE" SHALL MEAN: (1) ANY FELONY, ANY CLASS A MISDEMEANOR, OR ANY CLASS B MISDEMEANOR UNDER ARTICLE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY, ONE HUNDRED THIR- TY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE, ONE HUNDRED FORTY, ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED TWENTY, TWO HUNDRED THIRTY, TWO HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-THREE OR TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE OF THE PENAL LAW, OR A FELONY OR MISDEMEANOR UNDER SECTIONS ELEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-TWO AND ELEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-THREE OF THE VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW, OR (2) ANY OFFENSE IN ANY OTHER JURISDICTION FOR WHICH A SENTENCE TO A TERM OF IMPRISONMENT OF ONE YEAR OR OF MORE THAN ONE YEAR WAS AUTHORIZED AND IS AUTHORIZED IN THIS STATE IRRESPECTIVE OF WHETHER SUCH SENTENCE WAS IMPOSED, OR (3) ANY OFFENSE IN ANY OTHER JURISDICTION THE COMMISSION OF WHICH CONSTITUTES THE SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENT OF ANY OFFENSE UNDER ARTICLE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE, ONE HUNDRED FORTY, ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED TWENTY, TWO HUNDRED THIRTY, TWO HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-THREE OR TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE OF THE PENAL LAW OR A FELONY OR MISDEMEANOR UNDER SECTIONS ELEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-TWO AND ELEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-THREE OF THE VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW; (E) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR, IF THE PERSON IS A TENURED EMPLOYEE, WHO WITHIN S. 3501--B 3 THE LAST FIVE YEARS HAS BEEN FINED AS A PENALTY IMPOSED PURSUANT TO CHARGES RELATED TO CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM, CHRONIC LATENESS, OR IMPROPER USE OR RECORDING OF LEAVE TIME OR AS A RESULT OF SETTLEMENT OF CHARGES BROUGHT PURSUANT TO CHARGES RELATED TO CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM, CHRONIC LATENESS OR IMPROPER USE OR RECORDING OF LEAVE TIME; (F) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS WAS THE SUBJECT OF AN INVESTI- GATION WHERE ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT WERE SUBSTANTIATED BY THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SPECIAL COMMISSIONER OF INVESTIGATION, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS OR THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S OFFICE OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY; (G) ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO HAS FAILED TO FULFILL ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATION FROM THE DEPARTMENT AS OF AUGUST THIRTY-FIRST OF THE YEAR IN WHICH THERE IS A CITYWIDE LAYOFF; (H) ANY TEACHER, FOR TWO YEARS OR MORE, RANKED IN THE BOTTOM THIRTY PERCENT OF TEACHERS IN STUDENT TEST SCORES PROGRESS AS MEASURED BY THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S VALUE-ADDED ASSESSMENT EXCEPT FOR TEACHERS WHO WORK IN LICENSES SPECIFIC TO TEACHING CHILDREN WITH DISA- BILITIES OR SPECIAL NEEDS. VALUE-ADDED ASSESSMENTS SHALL CONTROL FOR FACTORS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE STUDENT STATUS OR WHOLE CLASS AVERAGE IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES: PREVIOUS ACADEMIC OUTCOMES, FREE AND REDUCED PRICE LUNCH STATUS, ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER STATUS, SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS, PREVIOUS SUSPENSIONS AND ABSENCES, GRADE-LEVEL RETENTION, SUMMER SCHOOL PARTICIPATION, YEARS ATTENDING THE CURRENT SCHOOL, ETHNICITY, GENDER, AND CLASS SIZE; AND (I) TEACHERS OR SUPERVI- SORS WHO ENTERED AGREEMENTS TO SERVE AN ADDITIONAL YEAR AS A PROBATIONER PURSUANT TO SECTION TWENTY-FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY-THREE OF THIS ARTICLE FOR THE SCHOOL YEAR PRECEDING A CITYWIDE LAYOFF. (II) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, IN THE CASE THAT THE NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS THAT ARE ABOLISHED, OR THE NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES THAT ARE LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARA- GRAPH IS GREATER THAN THE NUMBER OF SUCH POSITIONS THAT MUST BE ABOL- ISHED OR REDUCED AS A RESULT OF A CITYWIDE LAYOFF, THEN THE DECISION CONCERNING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED, AND WHICH PERSONS OCCU- PYING SUCH POSITIONS ARE TO BE LAID OFF, SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SUBPARAGRAPH. (1) THE FOLLOWING PROTOCOL SHALL BE USED UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE TOTAL NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES IDENTIFIED IS EQUAL TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS ABOLISHED. FOR PURPOSES OF THE PROTO- COL, THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL BE RANKED ALPHA- BETICALLY (A) THROUGH (I), PROVIDED THAT (A) SHALL BE RANKED THE HIGHEST PRIORITY AND (I) SHALL BE RANKED THE LOWEST PRIORITY. THE PROTOCOL SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AS FOLLOWS: A. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL IN ALL NINE OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH; B. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN EIGHT OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIOR- ITY OF THOSE EIGHT CATEGORIES; C. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN SEVEN OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIOR- ITY OF THOSE SEVEN CATEGORIES; D. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN SIX OF THE CATEGORIES LIST- ED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARA- S. 3501--B 4 GRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIORITY OF THOSE SIX CATEGORIES; E. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN FIVE OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIOR- ITY OF THOSE FIVE CATEGORIES; F. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN FOUR OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIOR- ITY OF THOSE FOUR CATEGORIES; G. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN THREE OF THE CATEGORIES LISTED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIOR- ITY OF THOSE THREE CATEGORIES; H. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO FALL WITHIN TWO OF THE CATEGORIES LIST- ED AS CLAUSES (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H) AND (I) OF SUBPARA- GRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ORDER OF THE COMBINED RANK PRIORITY OF THOSE TWO CATEGORIES; I. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WHO RECEIVED A RATING OF "UNSATISFACTORY" IN ANY OF THE LAST FIVE SCHOOL YEARS ON THEIR ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW; PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT IF FEWER LAYOFFS ARE REQUIRED THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, LAYOFFS SHALL BE DONE IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER: I. A TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WITH THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF UNSATISFACTORY RATINGS IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS; AND II. A TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WITH AN UNSATISFACTORY RATING RECEIVED IN THE MOST RECENT YEAR OR YEARS; J. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR, IF THE PERSON IS A TENURED EMPLOYEE, WHO WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS HAS BEEN FINED OR SUSPENDED WITHOUT PAY AS A PENALTY IMPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWENTY-A OF THIS CHAPTER OR AS A RESULT OF A SETTLEMENT OF CHARGES BROUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWENTY-A OF THIS CHAPTER; PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT IF FEWER LAYOFFS ARE REQUIRED THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY PERSONS SHALL BE LAID OFF IN ORDER OF THE MOST RECENT DISPOSITION; K. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WITH A CURRENT STATUS AS A TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR NOT APPOINTED TO A PERMANENT POSITION IN A SCHOOL FOR A PERI- OD OF SIX MONTHS OR MORE AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ANY CITYWIDE LAYOFF PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION; PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT IF FEWER LAYOFFS ARE REQUIRED THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, LAYOFFS SHALL BE DONE IN ORDER OF PERSONS WHO HAVE BEEN WITHOUT AN APPOINTED POSITION TO A SCHOOL THE LONGEST PERIOD OF TIME; L. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR CONVICTED OF A QUALIFYING CRIMINAL OFFENSE IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS. "QUALIFYING CRIMINAL OFFENSE" SHALL MEAN: (A) ANY FELONY, ANY CLASS A MISDEMEANOR, OR ANY CLASS B MISDEMEA- NOR UNDER ARTICLE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE, ONE HUNDRED FORTY, ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED TWENTY, TWO HUNDRED THIRTY, TWO HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-THREE OR TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE OF THE PENAL LAW OR A FELONY OR MISDEMEANOR UNDER SECTIONS ELEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-TWO AND ELEV- EN HUNDRED NINETY-THREE OF THE VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW, OR (B) ANY OFFENSE IN ANY OTHER JURISDICTION FOR WHICH A SENTENCE TO A TERM OF IMPRISONMENT OF ONE YEAR OR OF MORE THAN ONE YEAR WAS AUTHORIZED AND IS AUTHORIZED IN THIS STATE IRRESPECTIVE OF WHETHER SUCH SENTENCE WAS IMPOSED, OR (C) ANY OFFENSE IN ANY OTHER JURISDICTION THE COMMISSION OF WHICH CONSTITUTES THE SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENT OF ANY OFFENSE UNDER ARTI- CLE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE, ONE S. 3501--B 5 HUNDRED FORTY, ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED TWENTY, TWO HUNDRED THIRTY, TWO HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-THREE OR TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE OF THE PENAL LAW OR A FELONY OR MISDEMEANOR UNDER SECTIONS ELEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-TWO AND ELEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-THREE OF THE VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW; PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT IF FEWER LAYOFFS ARE REQUIRED THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, LAYOFFS SHALL BE DONE IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER: I. A TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR CONVICTED OF A FELONY IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS; AND II. A TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR CONVICTED OF A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS; AND III. A TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR CONVICTED IN THE MOST RECENT YEAR OR YEARS OF A CLASS B MISDEMEANOR UNDER ARTICLE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY, ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE, ONE HUNDRED FORTY, ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED TWENTY, TWO HUNDRED THIRTY, TWO HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY, TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-THREE OR TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE OF THE PENAL LAW OR A FELONY OR MISDEMEANOR UNDER SECTIONS ELEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-TWO AND ELEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-THREE OF THE VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW; M. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO HAS RECEIVED A FINE AS A PENALTY OR AS PART OF A STIPULATION IN SETTLEMENT OF CHARGES OF CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM OR LATENESS, OR IMPROPER USE OR RECORDING OF LEAVE TIME; PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT IF FEWER LAYOFFS ARE REQUIRED THAN THERE ARE PEOPLE IN THIS CATEGORY, LAYOFFS SHALL BE DONE IN ORDER OF THE MOST RECENT DISPOSITION; N. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS WAS THE SUBJECT OF AN INVESTIGATION WHERE ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT WERE SUBSTANTIATED BY THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SPECIAL COMMISSIONER OF INVESTIGATION, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTI- GATIONS OR THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S OFFICE OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY, PROVIDED HOWEVER IF THERE ARE FEWER LAYOFFS THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, LAYOFFS SHALL BE DONE IN ORDER OF THE MOST RECENT INVES- TIGATION OF SUBSTANTIATED ALLEGATIONS; O. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO HAS FAILED TO FULFILL ALL THE REQUIREMENTS FOR STATE CERTIFICATION AS OF AUGUST THIRTY-FIRST OF THE SCHOOL YEAR IN WHICH THERE IS A CITYWIDE LAYOFF, PROVIDED HOWEVER IF THERE ARE FEWER LAYOFFS THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, TEACH- ERS WHO HAVE BEEN WITHOUT FULL CERTIFICATION FROM THE DEPARTMENT THE LONGEST SHALL BE LAID OFF FIRST; P. ANY TEACHER, FOR TWO YEARS OR MORE, RANKED IN THE BOTTOM THIRTY PERCENT OF TEACHERS IN STUDENT TEST SCORES PROGRESS AS MEASURED BY THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S VALUE-ADDED ASSESSMENT EXCEPT FOR TEACHERS WHO WORK IN LICENSES SPECIFIC TO TEACHING CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES OR SPECIAL NEEDS. VALUE-ADDED ASSESSMENTS SHALL CONTROL FOR FACTORS INCLUD- ING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE STUDENT STATUS OR WHOLE CLASS AVERAGE IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES: PREVIOUS ACADEMIC OUTCOMES, FREE AND REDUCED PRICE LUNCH STATUS, ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER STATUS, SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS, PREVIOUS SUSPENSIONS AND ABSENCES, GRADE-LEVEL RETENTION, SUMMER SCHOOL PARTICIPATION, YEARS ATTENDING THE CURRENT SCHOOL, ETHNICITY, GENDER, AND CLASS SIZE, PROVIDED HOWEVER, IF THERE ARE FEWER LAYOFFS THAN THERE ARE PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, TEACHERS WITH THE LOWEST SCORES SHALL BE LAID OFF FIRST; AND Q. ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR WHO ENTERED AN AGREEMENT TO SERVE AN ADDITIONAL PROBATIONARY YEAR PURSUANT TO SECTION TWENTY-FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY-THREE OF THIS ARTICLE, FOR THE SCHOOL YEAR PRECEDING A CITYWIDE LAYOFF, PROVIDED HOWEVER, IF THERE ARE FEWER LAYOFFS THAN THERE ARE S. 3501--B 6 PERSONS IN THIS CATEGORY, TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS WITH THE MOST NUMBER OF ABSENCES SHALL BE LAID OFF FIRST. (III) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, IN THE CASE THAT THE NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS THAT ARE ABOLISHED, OR THE NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES THAT ARE LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION IS FEWER THAN THE NUMBER OF SUCH POSITIONS THAT MUST BE ABOLISHED OR REDUCED, THE DECISION CONCERNING WHICH ADDITIONAL POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED, AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSI- TIONS ARE TO BE LAID OFF, SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SUBPARA- GRAPH. (1) THE BOARD OF REGENTS SHALL PROMULGATE REGULATIONS PRESCRIBING HOW SUCH ADDITIONAL LAYOFFS SHALL BE EFFECTUATED. THE PROMULGATION OF ANY SUCH REGULATION SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT OF POSI- TIONS OR PERSONS TO BE LAID OFF OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT THE PROMULGA- TION OF ANY SUCH REGULATION SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE A FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; AND PROVIDED FURTHER THAT ANY SUCH REGULATIONS MUST ENSURE THAT IN A HIGH-NEED SCHOOL THE NUMBER OF STAFF LAID OFF SHALL NOT EXCEED THE PERCENTAGE OF THE OVERALL NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN THE SCHOOL THAT REPRES- ENTS HALF OF THE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF STAFF LAID OFF CITYWIDE; PROVIDED HOWEVER, SAID PERCENTAGE MAY BE EXCEEDED WHERE THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT CHOOSES TO ABOLISH ALL POSITIONS IN A LICENSE AREA PURSUANT TO SUBPARA- GRAPH (IV) OF THIS PARAGRAPH. SAID PERCENTAGES SHALL BE CALCULATED EXCLUDING ANY TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPHS (I) AND (II) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, A HIGH-NEED SCHOOL SHALL BE DEFINED AS A SCHOOL IN WHICH AT LEAST NINETY PERCENT OF THE ENROLLED STUDENTS ARE ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS FOR THE FREE AND REDUCED PRICE LUNCH PROGRAM. (2) SHOULD THE BOARD OF REGENTS FAIL TO PROMULGATE REGULATIONS NO LATER THAN SEVENTY-FIVE DAYS PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF A CITYWIDE LAYOFF, THE BUILDING PRINCIPAL SHALL DETERMINE WHICH ADDITIONAL POSI- TIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED, AND WHICH ADDITIONAL PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS ARE TO BE LAID OFF CONSISTENT WITH GUIDANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR. THE PRINCIPAL SHALL MAKE THE DECISION AFTER CONSIDERING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF A SCHOOL-BASED COMMITTEE COMPRISED OF TEACHERS, ADMINISTRATORS AND PARENTS. THE FOLLOWING FACTORS SHALL BE CONSIDERED IN DETERMINING WHICH POSITIONS SHALL BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS ARE TO BE LAID OFF: (I) SCHOOL NEEDS FOR PARTICULAR LICENSE AREAS; AND (II) WHEN MORE THAN ONE PERSON HOLDS A POSITION WITHIN THE SAME LICENSE AREA, SIGNIFICANT RELEVANT CONTRIB- UTIONS, ACCOMPLISHMENTS, OR PERFORMANCE OF EACH SUCH PERSON; RELEVANT SUPPLEMENTAL PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCES OF EACH SUCH PERSON AS DEMON- STRATED ON THE JOB; OFFICE OR SCHOOL NEEDS, INCLUDING CURRICULUM SPECIALIZED EDUCATION, DEGREES, LICENSES OR AREAS OF EXPERTISE; AND LENGTH OF SATISFACTORY SERVICE BY EACH SUCH PERSON. ANY SUCH GUIDANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S S. 3501--B 7 LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT OF POSITIONS OR PERSONS TO BE LAID OFF OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT THE PROMUL- GATION OF ANY SUCH GUIDANCE SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE A FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF; AND PROVIDED FURTHER THAT ANY SUCH GUIDANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR MUST ENSURE THAT IN A HIGH-NEED SCHOOL THE NUMBER OF STAFF LAID OFF SHALL NOT EXCEED THE PERCENTAGE OF THE OVERALL NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN THE SCHOOL THAT REPRESENTS HALF OF THE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF STAFF LAID OFF CITYWIDE, PROVIDED HOWEVER, SAID PERCENTAGE MAY BE EXCEEDED WHERE THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT CHOOSES TO ABOLISH ALL POSITIONS IN A LICENSE AREA PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (IV) OF THIS PARAGRAPH. SAID PERCENTAGES SHALL BE CALCULATED EXCLUDING ANY TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPHS (I) AND (II) OF THIS PARAGRAPH. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, A HIGH-NEED SCHOOL SHALL BE DEFINED AS A SCHOOL IN WHICH AT LEAST NINETY PERCENT OF THE ENROLLED STUDENTS ARE ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS FOR THE FREE AND REDUCED PRICE LUNCH PROGRAM. (IV) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, ANY REGULATION PROMULGATED BY THE BOARD OF REGENTS OR ANY LOCALLY DEVELOPED PROCESS PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE FOUR- TEEN OF THE CIVIL SERVICE LAW, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT SHALL NOT BE PROHIBITED FROM ABOLISHING ALL POSITIONS IN AN ENTIRE LICENSE AREA PURSUANT TO GUIDANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR. (B) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND ITS EMPLOYEES' COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGENTS SHALL ESTABLISH A PROCEDURE GOVERNING THE ABOLISHMENT OR REDUCTION OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITIONS AT INDIVIDUAL SCHOOLS IN ORDER TO MEET SCHOOL BUDGETARY NEEDS, REORGANIZE FUNCTIONS, OR FOR OTHER COMPELLING REASONS OUTSIDE OF A CITYWIDE REDUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION, PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE FOURTEEN OF THE CIVIL SERVICE LAW. ANY SUCH LOCALLY ESTABLISHED PROCESS SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED; PROVIDED HOWEVER THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT OF POSITIONS OR PERSONS TO BE EXCESSED OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT THE PROMULGATION OF ANY SUCH REGULATION SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE A FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED. FOR POSITIONS COVERED BY SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWELVE-C OF THIS CHAPTER, ANY SUCH LOCALLY DEVELOPED PROCESS SHALL BE BASED ON THE ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR TEACHERS AND SUPERVISORS PURSUANT TO SUCH SECTION THREE THOUSAND TWELVE-C AND ITS IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS. UNTIL AND UNLESS SUCH A PROCESS HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED AT LEAST NINETY DAYS BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHOOL YEAR, THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY: (I) DECISIONS CONCERNING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SAME PROCESS PRESCRIBED FOR MAKING LAYOFF DECISIONS SET FORTH IN SUBPARAGRAPHS (I) AND (II) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION. IN THE CASE THAT THE NUMBER OF TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EXCESSED IS FEWER THAN THE NUMBER OF SUCH POSITIONS THAT MUST BE EXCESSED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBPARAGRAPH, THE BOARD OF REGENTS SHALL PROMULGATE REGULATIONS ESTABLISHING THE PROCESS TO BE USED TO DETERMINE WHICH POSITIONS SHALL BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH S. 3501--B 8 POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED. THE PROMULGATION OF ANY SUCH REGULATION SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED; PROVIDED HOWEVER THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT OF POSITIONS OR PERSONS TO BE EXCESSED OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT THE PROMULGATION OF ANY SUCH REGU- LATION SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE A FACTOR IN ANY DECI- SION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED. SHOULD THE BOARD OF REGENTS FAIL TO PROMULGATE REGULATIONS NO LATER THAN SEVENTY-FIVE DAYS PRIOR TO THE FIRST DAY OF THE SCHOOL YEAR, THE BUILDING PRINCIPAL SHALL DETERMINE WHICH TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS ARE TO BE EXCESSED, CONSISTENT WITH GUID- ANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR PURSUANT TO THIS SUBDIVISION. THE PRINCIPAL SHALL MAKE THE DECISION AFTER CONSIDERING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF A SCHOOL-BASED COMMITTEE COMPRISED OF TEACHERS, ADMINISTRATORS AND PARENTS. THE FOLLOWING FACTORS SHALL BE CONSIDERED IN DETERMINING WHICH POSITIONS SHALL BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS ARE TO BE EXCESSED: (1) SCHOOL NEEDS FOR PARTICULAR LICENSE AREAS; AND (2) WHEN MORE THAN ONE PERSON HOLDS A POSITION WITHIN THE SAME LICENSE AREA: SIGNIFICANT RELEVANT CONTRIBUTIONS, ACCOMPLISHMENTS, OR PERFORM- ANCE OF EACH SUCH PERSON; RELEVANT SUPPLEMENTAL PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCES OF EACH SUCH PERSON AS DEMONSTRATED ON THE JOB; OFFICE OR SCHOOL NEEDS, INCLUDING: CURRICULUM SPECIALIZED EDUCATION, DEGREES, LICENSES OR AREAS OF EXPERTISE; AND LENGTH OF SATISFACTORY SERVICE BY EACH SUCH PERSON. ANY SUCH GUIDANCE PROMULGATED BY THE CHANCELLOR SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF SERVICE TO BE THE SOLE FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPY- ING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE EXCESSED; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ANY CONSIDERATION OF AN EMPLOYEE'S LENGTH OF FAITHFUL AND COMPETENT SERVICE AS A FACTOR FOR THE ABOLISHMENT OF POSITIONS OR PERSONS TO BE EXCESSED OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED IN A MANNER BENEFICIAL TO AN EMPLOYEE AND THAT THE PROMULGATION OF ANY SUCH GUIDANCE SHALL NOT PERMIT AN EMPLOYEE'S SALARY TO BE A FACTOR IN ANY DECISION REGARDING WHICH POSITIONS ARE TO BE ABOLISHED AND WHICH PERSONS OCCUPYING SUCH POSITIONS SHALL BE LAID OFF. SHOULD CITYWIDE LAYOFFS IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION BE CARRIED OUT, A DETERMINATION OF WHETHER ANY TEACHER OR SUPERVISOR SHALL BE LAID OFF WHOSE POSITION HAS BEEN ABOLISHED AND IS IN EXCESS FROM A REGULARLY APPOINTED POSITION IN THE DISTRICT FOR LESS THAN SIX MONTHS, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SUBPAR- AGRAPHS (I) AND (II) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION. S 4. Subdivision 4 of section 2588 of the education law is REPEALED and a new subdivision 4 is added to read as follows: 4. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND ITS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGENTS SHALL ESTABLISH A PROCEDURE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTI- CLE FOURTEEN OF THE CIVIL SERVICE LAW GOVERNING THE RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES TO RETURN TO VACANT POSITIONS IN THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT. UNTIL AND UNLESS A LOCALLY ESTABLISHED PROCEDURE IS ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE FOURTEEN OF THE CIVIL SERVICE LAW, THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY CONCERNING THE RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES TO RETURN TO VACANT POSI- TIONS. WHENEVER A TEACHING OR SUPERVISORY POSITION IS ABOLISHED PURSU- ANT TO CLAUSES ONE AND TWO OF SUBPARAGRAPH (III) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION, SHOULD A VACANCY OCCUR IN THE SAME POSITION AT THE SAME SCHOOL OR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE WITHIN ONE YEAR OF S. 3501--B 9 THE DATE WHEN THE POSITION WAS ABOLISHED, THE PRINCIPAL, OR THE CHANCEL- LOR OR HIS OR HER DESIGNEE, SHALL OFFER THE POSITION TO THE PERSON WHO HELD THE POSITION BEFORE IT WAS ABOLISHED. IF THE PERSON REJECTS THE OFFER, OR FAILS TO RESPOND TO THE OFFER WITHIN THIRTY DAYS, THE PERSON SHALL NO LONGER HAVE A RIGHT TO RETURN TO THE POSITION. IF MORE THAN ONE POSITION WAS ABOLISHED IN THE SAME LICENSE AREA AT THE SAME SCHOOL OR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, AND THERE ARE FEWER VACANCIES IN THE SAME LICENSE AREA THAN PERSONS WHOSE POSITIONS WERE ABOLISHED, THE PRINCIPAL, OR THE CHANCELLOR, SHALL HAVE THE DISCRETION TO DETERMINE WHICH PERSON SHOULD BE OFFERED THE POSITION FIRST. THE CHANCELLOR SHALL PROMULGATE GUIDANCE TO DETERMINE THE RIGHT OF RETURN OF ANY TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (IV) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION. TEACHERS OR SUPERVISORS LAID OFF PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION AND CLAUSE ONE OF SUBPARAGRAPH (II) OF PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION, SHALL HAVE NO RIGHTS TO RETURN TO A VACANT POSITION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION. S 5. Subdivision 7 of section 2588 of the education law is REPEALED. S 6. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, section or part of this act shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid and after exhaustion of all further judicial review, the judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, para- graph, section or part of this act directly involved in the controversy in which the judgment shall have been rendered. S 7. This act shall take effect immediately.
Comments
Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.
Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.
Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.