senate Bill S4529B

Vetoed By Governor
2013-2014 Legislative Session

Relates to the reentry of foster children into foster care

download bill text pdf

Sponsored By

Archive: Last Bill Status - Vetoed by Governor


  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor Calendar
    • Passed Senate
    • Passed Assembly
  • Delivered to Governor
  • Vetoed by Governor

do you support this bill?

Actions

view actions (16)
Assembly Actions - Lowercase
Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Sep 27, 2013 vetoed memo.226
Sep 17, 2013 delivered to governor
Jun 18, 2013 returned to senate
passed assembly
Jun 12, 2013 ordered to third reading rules cal.157
substituted for a7339a
Jun 10, 2013 referred to codes
delivered to assembly
passed senate
Jun 03, 2013 amended on third reading 4529b
May 22, 2013 advanced to third reading
May 21, 2013 2nd report cal.
May 20, 2013 1st report cal.624
May 13, 2013 print number 4529a
May 13, 2013 amend and recommit to children and families
Apr 08, 2013 referred to children and families

Votes

view votes

Bill Amendments

Original
A
B (Active)
Original
A
B (Active)

S4529 - Bill Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:
A7339A
Law Section:
Family Court Act
Laws Affected:
Amd §§355.3, 756-a & 1091, Fam Ct Act

S4529 - Bill Texts

view summary

Relates to the reentry of foster children into foster care.

view sponsor memo
BILL NUMBER:S4529

TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the family court act, in relation to
reentry of former foster children into foster care

This is one in a series of measures being introduced at the request of
the Chief Administrative Judge upon the recommendation of her Family
Court Advisory and Rules Committee.

Chapter 342 of the Laws of 2010, which permits youth who have "aged
out" of foster care at the age of 18 to reenter care, has provided a
vital "safety net" in cases where such youth would otherwise be facing
homelessness or other adverse outcomes. Enacted at the time that
Federal foster care assistance first became available for youth
between the ages of 18 and 21,{1} the statute has proven invaluable in
preventing future societal costs by ensuring that the youth will have
the support necessary to fulfill the commitments that they must make
to participate in educational or vocational programs as a condition of
reentry into care.

We submit this measure to clarify one aspect of the statute that has
caused some confusion, that is, the categories of former foster youth
to whom the statute applies. "Former foster care youth" is not defined
in Family Court Article 10-B and, although referenced in the
permanency hearing provisions (Family Court Act Article 10-A), no
specific cross-references are contained in provisions applicable to
Persons in Need of Supervision (PINS) or juvenile delinquency. This
measure would remedy that gap by amending the post-dispositional
provisions regarding extensions of placement in both the juvenile
delinquency and PINS statutes -i.e., Family Court Act §§ 355.3 and
756-a(f) - to include references to Family Court Act § 1091. It would
further amend Family Court Act § 1091 to add a definition of "former
foster care youth" that explicitly includes youth placed in foster
care pursuant to juvenile delinquency, PINS, child protective or
destitute child adjudications, voluntary placements and children freed
for adoption but not yet adopted.

This measure would codify the only appellate ruling on the statute to
date and is consistent with the position taken by the State Office of
Children and Family Services (OCFS), the oversight agency for foster
care in New York. The Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter
of Jefry H., -A.D.3d-, 955 N.Y.S.2d 90, 2012 N.Y.Slip Op. 08007 (2nd
Dept., 2012), recently reversed a Family Court decision in which the
judge had construed the absence of specific language to mean that the
statute did not cover PINS cases. In holding that Family Court Act
1091 does apply to PINS who had been placed in foster care, the
Appellate Division noted that the rationale for enacting chapter 342
applies with equal force to all foster youth discharged from care. The
Court further noted the broad interpretation accorded to the scope of
the statute by the OCFS. Id. Consistent with Federal requirements to
treat all categories of youth eligible to receive foster care
assistance under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act identically,
the OCFS, in its administrative memorandum to local social services
districts, indicated that the statute applied to all former foster
youth, including PINS and juvenile delinquents placed with local
departments of social services. See 11-OCFS ADM-02 (March 3, 2011) at
pages 2, 7.


Professor Merril Sobie, in his 2012 Practice Commentary to Family
Court Act § 1091, indicated that "the language strongly suggests that
the statute applies to each and every foster child, and is not limited
to children who have been placed as a result of an Article 10 child
protective proceeding." Writing before the Appellate Division reversal
in Matter of Jefry H., Prof. Sobie continued:

It would have been preferable if Article 10-B had been drafted to
explicitly apply to non-Article 10 placements. (See, by comparison,
Section 1087(a), which enumerates the placements for which Article
10-A applies.) But the lack of an explicit provision is not
necessarily dispositive. It's difficult to conceive that the
Legislature intended to differentiate or discriminate between
similarly situated "former foster care youth", or that the legislative
decision to craft a separate article excludes non-Article 10 children
(if Section 1091 was intended to be limited to Article 10 placements,
it would have presumably been added to that Article). The issue will
probably be raised and determined at the Appellate Division level
(unless the Legislature quickly amends Section 1091).

Predictably, most youth returning to foster care are those who had
been placed pursuant to child protective proceedings, but the option
is equally vital for those youth in the juvenile justice system. As
the Supporting Memorandum for chapter 342 stated:

Although the Family Court Act permits [foster youth] to consent to
continued foster care with its attendant supports and services until
they reach the age of 21, many make precipitous decisions to show
their independence and refuse to consent to remain in care even when
they are desperately in need of assistance. Youth living in intact
families are not faced with such decisions; they may leave home to
attend college, but they do not abruptly terminate all connections
with their families and often continue to receive financial and other
aid. Youth leaving foster care, in contrast, often have no family to
fall back on. For them, independent living may be akin to falling off
a precipice.

(Assembly Mem in Support, Bill Jacket, L. 2010, c. 342 at 8). The
well-documented problems faced by these youth - increased incidence of
school drop-out, homelessness, unemployment, criminality and teen
pregnancy - are even more likely to afflict the vulnerable juvenile
justice population upon discharge from care. In its memos to the
Governor regarding chapter 342, both the Division of the Budget and
OCFS noted the additional costs to counties from these adverse
consequences that would be averted by permitting the option for youth
to reenter foster care. See Memo of Division of the Budget and Letter
from OCFS General Counsel, Bill Jacket, L. 2010, c. 342. Codification
of Matter of Jefry H. through enactment of this measure, therefore,
will provide a cost-effective avenue to support a particularly
vulnerable population as they make the difficult transition to
independent adulthood.

This measure, which would have no fiscal impact upon the State, would
take effect immediately.

Legislative History: None. New proposal.


{1}Federal foster care assistance under Title IV-E of the Social
Security Act became available as of October 1, 2010 pursuant to the
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008
[Public Law 110351].

view full text
download pdf
                    S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________

                                  4529

                       2013-2014 Regular Sessions

                            I N  S E N A T E

                              April 8, 2013
                               ___________

Introduced by Sen. FELDER -- (at request of the Office of Court Adminis-
  tration)  --  read  twice  and ordered printed, and when printed to be
  committed to the Committee on Children and Families

AN ACT to amend the family court act, in relation to reentry  of  former
  foster children into foster care

  THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  Section 1. Subdivision 6 of section 355.3 of the family court act,  as
amended  by  chapter  663  of  the  laws  of 1985, is amended to read as
follows:
  6. Successive extensions of placement under this section may be grant-
ed, but no placement may be made or continued  beyond  the  respondent's
eighteenth  birthday  without [the child's] HIS OR HER consent and in no
event past [the child's] HIS OR HER twenty-first birthday. A RESPONDENT,
WHO HAS BEEN PLACED WITH A LOCAL SOCIAL SERVICES  DISTRICT  PURSUANT  TO
SECTION 353.3 OF THIS CHAPTER, INCLUDING A DISTRICT THAT HAS AN APPROVED
"CLOSE  TO HOME" PLAN, AND WHO DOES NOT CONSENT TO REMAIN IN CARE BEYOND
HIS OR HER EIGHTEENTH BIRTHDAY, AS WOULD BE REQUIRED IN ORDER TO  REMAIN
IN  CARE,  MAY MOVE OR, WITH HIS OR HER CONSENT, MAY BE THE SUBJECT OF A
MOTION BY A SOCIAL SERVICES OFFICIAL TO REENTER FOSTER CARE  IN  ACCORD-
ANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION ONE THOUSAND NINETY-ONE OF THIS ACT.
  S  2.  Subdivision  (f)  of  section 756-a of the family court act, as
added by chapter 604 of the laws of 1986, is amended to read as follows:
  (f) Successive extensions of  placement  under  this  section  may  be
granted,  but  no  placement may be made or continued beyond the child's
eighteenth birthday without his or her consent and in no event past  his
or  her twenty-first birthday. A CHILD, WHO HAS BEEN PLACED WITH A LOCAL
SOCIAL SERVICES DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY-SIX  OF
THIS  CHAPTER,  AND WHO DOES NOT CONSENT TO REMAIN IN CARE BEYOND HIS OR
HER EIGHTEENTH BIRTHDAY, AS WOULD BE REQUIRED  IN  ORDER  TO  REMAIN  IN
CARE,  MAY  MOVE  OR,  WITH  HIS OR HER CONSENT, MAY BE THE SUBJECT OF A

 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                      [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                           LBD09322-01-3

S. 4529                             2

MOTION BY A SOCIAL SERVICES OFFICIAL TO REENTER FOSTER CARE  IN  ACCORD-
ANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION ONE THOUSAND NINETY-ONE OF THIS ACT.
  S  3.  Section 1091 of the family court act is amended by adding a new
subdivision (d) to read as follows:
  (D) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "FORMER  FOSTER  CARE  YOUTH"  SHALL
INCLUDE  A  YOUTH  UNDER  THE  AGE  OF TWENTY-ONE WHO DID NOT CONSENT TO
REMAIN IN FOSTER CARE BEYOND HIS OR HER EIGHTEENTH BIRTHDAY, AS WOULD BE
REQUIRED IN ORDER TO REMAIN IN CARE, AND WHO HAD BEEN PLACED  IN  FOSTER
CARE  PURSUANT  TO ARTICLE THREE, SEVEN, TEN, TEN-A OR TEN-C OF THIS ACT
OR SECTION THREE HUNDRED FIFTY-EIGHT-A OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW OR WHO
HAS BEEN FREED FOR ADOPTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION SIX HUNDRED THIR-
TY-SIX OF THIS  ACT  OR  SECTION  THREE  HUNDRED  EIGHTY-THREE-C,  THREE
HUNDRED  EIGHTY-FOUR  OR  THREE  HUNDRED  EIGHTY-FOUR-B  OF  THE  SOCIAL
SERVICES LAW BUT WHO HAS NOT YET BEEN ADOPTED.
  S 4. This act shall take effect immediately.

S4529A - Bill Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:
A7339A
Law Section:
Family Court Act
Laws Affected:
Amd §§355.3, 756-a & 1091, Fam Ct Act

S4529A - Bill Texts

view summary

Relates to the reentry of foster children into foster care.

view sponsor memo
BILL NUMBER:S4529A

TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the family court act, in relation to
reentry of former foster children into foster care

This is one in a series of measures being introduced at the request of
the Chief Administrative Judge upon the recommendation of her Family
Court Advisory and Rules Committee.

Chapter 342 of the Laws of 2010, which permits youth who have "aged
out" of foster care at the age of 18 to reenter care, has provided a
vital "safety net" in cases where such youth would otherwise be facing
homelessness or other adverse outcomes. Enacted at the time that
Federal foster care assistance first became available for youth
between the ages of 18 and 21{1} the statute has proven invaluable in
preventing future societal costs by ensuring that the youth will have
the support necessary to fulfill the commitments that they must make
to participate in educational or vocational programs as a condition of
reentry into care.

We submit this measure to clarify one aspect of the statute that has
caused some confusion, that is, the categories of former foster youth
to whom the statute applies. "Former foster care youth" is not defined
in Family Court Article 10-B and, although referenced in the
permanency hearing provisions (Family Court Act Article 10-A), no
specific cross-references are contained in provisions applicable to
Persons in Need of Supervision (PINS) or juvenile delinquency. This
measure would remedy that gap by amending the post-dispositional
provisions regarding extensions of placement in both the juvenile
delinquency and PINS statutes -i.e., Family Court Act §§ 355.3 and
756-a(f) - to include references to Family Court Act § 1091. With
respect to juvenile delinquents, it would preclude youth reentering
foster care from being placed in facilities directly operated by the
State Office of Children and Family Services (OCFS). It would further
amend Family Court Act § 1091 to add a definition of "former foster
care youth" that explicitly includes youth placed in foster care
pursuant to juvenile delinquency, PINS, child protective or destitute
child adjudications, voluntary placements and children freed for
adoption but not yet adopted.

This measure would codify the only appellate ruling on the statute to
date and is consistent with the position taken by the OCFS, the
oversight agency for foster care in New York. The Appellate Division,
Second Department, in Matter of Jefry H., -A.D.3d-, 955 N.Y.S.2d 90,
2012 N.Y.Slip Op. 08007 (2nd Dept., 2012), recently reversed a Family
Court decision in which the judge had construed the absence of
specific language to mean that the statute did not cover PINS cases.
In holding that Family Court Act § 1091 does apply to PINS who had
been placed in foster care, the Appellate Division noted that the
rationale for enacting chapter 342 applies with equal force to all
foster youth discharged from care. The Court further noted the broad
interpretation accorded to the scope of the statute by the OCFS. Id.
Consistent with Federal requirements to treat all categories of youth
eligible to receive foster care assistance under Title IV-E of the
Social Security Act identically, the OCFS, in its administrative
memorandum to local social services districts, indicated that the
statute applied to all former foster youth, including PINS and


juvenile delinquents placed with local departments of social services.
See 11-OCFS ADM-02 (March 3, 2011) at pages 2, 7.

Professor Merril Sobie, in his 2012 Practice Commentary to Family
Court Act § 1091, indicated that "the language strongly suggests that
the statute applies to each and every foster child, and is not limited
to children who have been placed as a result of an Article 10 (child
protective) proceeding." Writing before the Appellate Division
reversal in Matter of Jefry H., Prof. Sobie continued:

It would have been preferable if Article 10-B had been drafted to
explicitly apply to non-Article 10 placements. (See, by comparison,
Section 1087(a), which enumerates the placements for which Article
10-A applies.) But the lack of an explicit provision is not
necessarily dispositive. It's difficult to conceive that the
Legislature intended to differentiate or discriminate between
similarly situated "former foster care youth", or that the legislative
decision to craft a Separate article excludes non-Article 10 children
(if Section 1091 was intended to be limited to Article 10 placements,
it would have presumably been added to that Article). The issue will
probably be raised and determined at the Appellate Division level
(unless the Legislature quickly amends Section 1091).

Predictably, most youth returning to foster care are those who had
been placed pursuant to child protective proceedings, but the option
is equally vital for those youth in the juvenile justice system. As
the Supporting Memorandum for chapter 342 stated:

Although the Family Court Act permits (foster youth) to consent to
continued foster care with its attendant supports and services until
they reach the age of 21, many make precipitous decisions to show
their independence and refuse to consent to remain in care even when
they are desperately in need of assistance. Youth living in intact
families are not faced with such decisions; they may leave home to
attend college, but they do not abruptly terminate all connections
with their families and often continue to receive financial and other
aid. Youth leaving foster care, in contrast, often have no family to
fall back on. For them, independent living may be akin to falling off
a precipice.

(Assembly Mem in Support, Bill Jacket, L. 2010, c. 342 at 8). The
well-documented problems faced by these youth - increased incidence of
school drop-out, homelessness, unemployment, criminality and teen
pregnancy - are even more likely to afflict the vulnerable juvenile
justice population upon discharge from care. in its memos to the
Governor regarding chapter 342, both the Division of the Budget and
OCFS noted the additional costs to counties from these adverse
consequences that would be averted by permitting the option for youth
to reenter foster care, See Memo of Division of the Budget and Letter
from OCFS General Counsel, Bill jacket, L. 2010, c. 342. Codification
of Matter of Jefry H. through enactment of this measure, therefore,
will provide a cost-effective avenue to support a particularly
vulnerable population as they make the difficult transition to
independent adulthood.

This measure, which would have no fiscal impact upon the State, would
take effect immediately.


2013 Legislative History: OCA 2013-8 Senate 4529 (Sen. Felder) ref to
Children & Family Services

{1} Federal foster care assistance under Title IV-E of the Social
Security Act became available as of October 1, 2010 pursuant to the
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008
(Public Law 110-351).

view full text
download pdf
                    S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________

                                 4529--A

                       2013-2014 Regular Sessions

                            I N  S E N A T E

                              April 8, 2013
                               ___________

Introduced by Sen. FELDER -- (at request of the Office of Court Adminis-
  tration)  --  read  twice  and ordered printed, and when printed to be
  committed to the Committee  on  Children  and  Families  --  committee
  discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted
  to said committee

AN  ACT  to amend the family court act, in relation to reentry of former
  foster children into foster care

  THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  Section  1. Subdivision 6 of section 355.3 of the family court act, as
amended by chapter 663 of the laws  of  1985,  is  amended  to  read  as
follows:
  6. Successive extensions of placement under this section may be grant-
ed,  but  no  placement may be made or continued beyond the respondent's
eighteenth birthday without [the child's] HIS OR HER consent and  in  no
event past [the child's] HIS OR HER twenty-first birthday. A RESPONDENT,
WHO  WAS  PREVIOUSLY PLACED WITH A LOCAL SOCIAL SERVICES DISTRICT OR THE
OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES PURSUANT TO SECTION 353.3 OF THIS
CHAPTER, INCLUDING A DISTRICT THAT HAS AN APPROVED "CLOSE TO HOME" PLAN,
AND WHO DID NOT CONSENT TO REMAIN IN CARE BEYOND HIS OR  HER  EIGHTEENTH
BIRTHDAY,  AS WOULD BE REQUIRED IN ORDER TO REMAIN IN CARE, MAY MOVE OR,
WITH HIS OR HER CONSENT, MAY BE THE SUBJECT OF  A  MOTION  BY  A  SOCIAL
SERVICES  OFFICIAL  TO  REENTER  FOSTER  CARE  IN  ACCORDANCE  WITH  THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTION ONE THOUSAND  NINETY-ONE  OF  THIS  ACT.  NO  SUCH
RESPONDENT REENTERING FOSTER CARE SHALL BE PLACED IN A FACILITY DIRECTLY
OPERATED  BY  THE  OFFICE  OF  CHILDREN  AND FAMILY SERVICES PURSUANT TO
SECTION FIVE HUNDRED FOUR OF THE EXECUTIVE LAW.
  S 2. Subdivision (f) of section 756-a of  the  family  court  act,  as
added by chapter 604 of the laws of 1986, is amended to read as follows:
  (f)  Successive  extensions  of  placement  under  this section may be
granted, but no placement may be made or continued  beyond  the  child's

 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                      [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                           LBD09322-03-3

S. 4529--A                          2

eighteenth  birthday without his or her consent and in no event past his
or her twenty-first birthday. A CHILD, WHO WAS PREVIOUSLY PLACED WITH  A
LOCAL  SOCIAL SERVICES DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY-
SIX  OF  THIS  CHAPTER, AND WHO DID NOT CONSENT TO REMAIN IN CARE BEYOND
HIS OR HER EIGHTEENTH BIRTHDAY, AS WOULD BE REQUIRED IN ORDER TO  REMAIN
IN  CARE,  MAY MOVE OR, WITH HIS OR HER CONSENT, MAY BE THE SUBJECT OF A
MOTION BY A SOCIAL SERVICES OFFICIAL TO REENTER FOSTER CARE  IN  ACCORD-
ANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION ONE THOUSAND NINETY-ONE OF THIS ACT.
  S  3.  Section 1091 of the family court act is amended by adding a new
subdivision (d) to read as follows:
  (D) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "FORMER  FOSTER  CARE  YOUTH"  SHALL
INCLUDE  A  YOUTH  UNDER  THE  AGE  OF TWENTY-ONE WHO DID NOT CONSENT TO
REMAIN IN FOSTER CARE BEYOND HIS OR HER EIGHTEENTH BIRTHDAY, AS WOULD BE
REQUIRED IN ORDER TO REMAIN IN CARE, AND WHO HAD BEEN PLACED  IN  FOSTER
CARE  PURSUANT  TO ARTICLE THREE, SEVEN, TEN, TEN-A OR TEN-C OF THIS ACT
OR SECTION THREE HUNDRED FIFTY-EIGHT-A OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW OR WHO
HAS BEEN FREED FOR ADOPTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION SIX HUNDRED THIR-
TY-SIX OF THIS  ACT  OR  SECTION  THREE  HUNDRED  EIGHTY-THREE-C,  THREE
HUNDRED  EIGHTY-FOUR  OR  THREE  HUNDRED  EIGHTY-FOUR-B  OF  THE  SOCIAL
SERVICES LAW BUT WHO HAS NOT YET BEEN ADOPTED.
  S 4. This act shall take effect immediately.

S4529B (ACTIVE) - Bill Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:
A7339A
Law Section:
Family Court Act
Laws Affected:
Amd §§355.3, 756-a & 1091, Fam Ct Act

S4529B (ACTIVE) - Bill Texts

view summary

Relates to the reentry of foster children into foster care.

view sponsor memo
BILL NUMBER:S4529B

TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the family court act, in relation to
reentry of former foster children into foster care

This is one in a series of measures being introduced at the request of
the Chief Administrative Judge upon the recommendation of her Family
Court Advisory and Rules Committee.

Chapter 342 of the Laws of 2010, which permits youth who have "aged
out" of foster care at the age of 18 to reenter care, has provided a
vital "safety net" in cases where such youth would otherwise be facing
homelessness or other adverse outcomes. Enacted at the time that
Federal foster care assistance first became available for youth
between the ages of 18 and 21,{1} the statute has proven invaluable in
preventing future societal costs by ensuring that the youth will have
the support necessary to fulfill the commitments that they must make
to participate in educational or vocational programs as a condition of
reentry into care.

We submit this measure to clarify one aspect of the statute that has
caused some confusion, that is, the categories of former foster youth
to whom the statute applies. "Former foster care youth" is not defined
in Family Court Article 10-B and, although referenced in the
permanency hearing provisions (Family Court Act Article 10-A), no
specific cross-references are contained in provisions applicable to
Persons in Need of Supervision (PINS) or juvenile delinquency. This
measure would remedy that gap by amending the post-dispositional
provisions regarding extensions of placement in both the juvenile
delinquency and PINS statutes -i.e., Family Court Act §§ 355.3 and
756-a(f) - to include references to Family Court Act § 1091.
Adjudicated juvenile delinquent and PINS youth placed with a local
department of social services (DSS) or the New York City
Administration for Children's Services (ACS), including juvenile
delinquents placed in New York City's "Close to Home" program, would
be able to seek reentry into care or, with their consent, be the
subject of a petition for reentry by the local DSS or ACS, as
applicable. Adjudicated juvenile delinquents placed with, or
transferred to, the New York State Office of Children and Family
Services (OCFS) for placement in a non-secure level of care would be
able to seek reentry or, with their consent, be the subjects of
petitions for reentry by OCFS with the caveat that such youth would be
able to be placed in non-secure agencies under contract with OCFS but
not in facilities directly operated by OCFS pursuant to Executive Law
§ 504. It would further amend Family Court Act § 1091 to add a
definition of "former foster care youth" that explicitly includes
youth placed in foster care pursuant to juvenile delinquency, PINS,
child protective or destitute child adjudications, voluntary
placements and children freed for adoption but not yet adopted.

This measure would codify the only appellate ruling on the statute to
date and is consistent with the position taken by the OCFS, the
oversight agency for foster care in New York. The Appellate Division,
Second Department, in Matter of-lefty H., 102 A.D.3d 132, 955 N.Y.S.2d
90, 2012 N.Y.Slip Op. 08007 (2nd Dept, 2012), recently reversed a
Family Court decision in which the judge had construed the absence of
specific language to mean that the statute did not cover PINS cases.


In holding that Family Court Act § 1091 does apply to PINS who had
been placed in foster care, the Appellate Division noted that the
rationale for enacting chapter 342 applies with equal force to all
foster youth discharged from care. The Court further noted the broad
interpretation accorded to the scope of the statute by the OCFS. Id.
Consistent with Federal requirements to treat all categories of youth
eligible to receive foster care assistance under Title IV-E of the
Social Security Act identically, the OCFS, in its administrative
memorandum to local social services districts, indicated that the
statute applied to all former foster youth, including PINS and
juvenile delinquents placed with local departments of social services.
See 11-OCFS ADM-02 (March 3, 2011) at pages 2, 7.

Professor Merril Sobie, in his 2012 Practice Commentary to Family
Court Act § 1091, indicated that "(t)he language strongly suggests
that the statute applies to each and every foster child, and is not
limited to children who have been placed as a result of an Article 10
(child protective) proceeding." Writing before the Appellate Division
reversal in Matter of Jefry H., Prof. Sobie continued:

It would have been preferable if Article 10-B had been drafted to
explicitly apply to non-Article 10 placements. (See, by comparison,
Section 1087(a), which enumerates the placements for which Article
10-A applies.) But the lack of an explicit provision is not
necessarily dispositive. It's difficult to conceive that the
Legislature intended to differentiate or discriminate between
similarly situated "former foster care youth", or that the legislative
decision to craft a separate article excludes non-Article 10 children
(if Section 1091 was intended to be limited to Article 10 placements,
it would have presumably been added to that Article). The issue will
probably be raised and determined at the Appellate Division level
(unless the Legislature quickly amends Section 1091).

Predictably, most youth returning to foster care are those who had
been placed pursuant to child protective proceedings, but the option
is equally vital for those youth in the juvenile justice system. As
the Supporting Memorandum for chapter 342 stated:

Although the Family Court Act permits (foster youth) to consent to
continued foster care with its attendant supports and services until
they reach the age of 21, many make precipitous decisions to show
their independence and refuse to consent to remain in care even when
they are desperately in need of assistance. Youth living in intact
families are not faced with such decisions; they may leave home to
attend college, but they do not abruptly terminate all connections
with their families and often continue to receive financial and other
aid. Youth leaving foster care, in contrast, often have no family to
fall back on. For them, independent living may be akin to falling off
a precipice.

(Assembly Mem in Support, Bill jacket, L. 2010, c. 342 at 8). The
well-documented problems faced by these youth - increased incidence of
school drop-out, homelessness, unemployment, criminality and teen
pregnancy - are even more likely to afflict the vulnerable juvenile
justice population upon discharge from care. In its memos to the
Governor regarding chapter 342, both the Division of the Budget and
OCFS noted the additional costs to counties from these adverse


consequences that would be averted by permitting the option for youth
to reenter foster care. See Memo of Division of the Budget and Letter
from OCFS General Counsel, Bill jacket, L. 2010, c. 342. Codification
of Matter of Jefry H. through enactment of this measure, therefore,
will provide a cost-effective avenue to support a particularly
vulnerable population as they make the difficult transition to
independent adulthood.

This measure, which would have no fiscal impact upon the State, would
take effect immediately.

2013 Legislative History: Senate 4529-A (Senator Felder) (adv to 3rd
Rdg.) Assembly 7339 (M. of A. Lupardo) (reported ref to Codes)

{1} Federal foster care assistance under Title IV-E of the Social
Security Act became available as of October 1, 2010 pursuant to the
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008
(Public Law 110-351).

view full text
download pdf
                    S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________

                                 4529--B
    Cal. No. 624

                       2013-2014 Regular Sessions

                            I N  S E N A T E

                              April 8, 2013
                               ___________

Introduced by Sen. FELDER -- (at request of the Office of Court Adminis-
  tration)  --  read  twice  and ordered printed, and when printed to be
  committed to the Committee  on  Children  and  Families  --  committee
  discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted
  to  said  committee -- reported favorably from said committee, ordered
  to first and second report, ordered to a third  reading,  amended  and
  ordered reprinted, retaining its place in the order of third reading

AN  ACT  to amend the family court act, in relation to reentry of former
  foster children into foster care

  THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  Section  1. Subdivision 6 of section 355.3 of the family court act, as
amended by chapter 663 of the laws  of  1985,  is  amended  to  read  as
follows:
  6. Successive extensions of placement under this section may be grant-
ed,  but  no  placement may be made or continued beyond the respondent's
eighteenth birthday without [the child's] HIS OR HER consent and  in  no
event past [the child's] HIS OR HER twenty-first birthday. A RESPONDENT,
WHO WAS PREVIOUSLY PLACED WITH A LOCAL SOCIAL SERVICES DISTRICT PURSUANT
TO  SECTION  353.3  OF  THIS  CHAPTER,  INCLUDING A DISTRICT THAT HAS AN
APPROVED "CLOSE TO HOME" PLAN, AND WHO DID NOT CONSENT TO REMAIN IN CARE
BEYOND HIS OR HER EIGHTEENTH BIRTHDAY, AS WOULD BE REQUIRED IN ORDER  TO
REMAIN IN CARE, MAY MOVE OR, WITH HIS OR HER CONSENT, MAY BE THE SUBJECT
OF  A  MOTION  BY  A  SOCIAL SERVICES OFFICIAL TO REENTER FOSTER CARE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION  ONE  THOUSAND  NINETY-ONE  OF
THIS  ACT.  A RESPONDENT, WHO WAS PREVIOUSLY PLACED WITH, OR TRANSFERRED
TO, THE OFFICE OF CHILDREN  AND  FAMILY  SERVICES  FOR  PLACEMENT  IN  A
NON-SECURE  LEVEL  OF  CARE  AND  WHO  DID NOT CONSENT TO REMAIN IN CARE
BEYOND HIS OR HER EIGHTEENTH BIRTHDAY, AS WOULD BE REQUIRED IN ORDER  TO
REMAIN IN CARE, MAY MOVE OR, WITH HIS OR HER CONSENT, MAY BE THE SUBJECT
OF  A  MOTION  BY  THE  OFFICE  TO  REENTER PLACEMENT WITH THE OFFICE IN

 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                      [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                           LBD09322-05-3

S. 4529--B                          2

ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION  ONE  THOUSAND  NINETY-ONE  OF
THIS  ACT;  PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT NO SUCH RESPONDENT REENTERING PLACE-
MENT WITH THE OFFICE SHALL BE PLACED IN A FACILITY DIRECTLY OPERATED  BY
THE OFFICE PURSUANT TO SECTION FIVE HUNDRED FOUR OF THE EXECUTIVE LAW.
  S  2.  Subdivision  (f)  of  section 756-a of the family court act, as
added by chapter 604 of the laws of 1986, is amended to read as follows:
  (f) Successive extensions of  placement  under  this  section  may  be
granted,  but  no  placement may be made or continued beyond the child's
eighteenth birthday without his or her consent and in no event past  his
or  her twenty-first birthday. A CHILD, WHO WAS PREVIOUSLY PLACED WITH A
LOCAL SOCIAL SERVICES DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION SEVEN HUNDRED  FIFTY-
SIX  OF  THIS  CHAPTER, AND WHO DID NOT CONSENT TO REMAIN IN CARE BEYOND
HIS OR HER EIGHTEENTH BIRTHDAY, AS WOULD BE REQUIRED IN ORDER TO  REMAIN
IN  CARE,  MAY MOVE OR, WITH HIS OR HER CONSENT, MAY BE THE SUBJECT OF A
MOTION BY A SOCIAL SERVICES OFFICIAL TO REENTER FOSTER CARE  IN  ACCORD-
ANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION ONE THOUSAND NINETY-ONE OF THIS ACT.
  S  3.  Section 1091 of the family court act is amended by adding a new
subdivision (d) to read as follows:
  (D) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "FORMER  FOSTER  CARE  YOUTH"  SHALL
INCLUDE  A  YOUTH  UNDER  THE  AGE  OF TWENTY-ONE WHO DID NOT CONSENT TO
REMAIN IN FOSTER CARE BEYOND HIS OR HER EIGHTEENTH BIRTHDAY, AS WOULD BE
REQUIRED IN ORDER TO REMAIN IN CARE, AND WHO HAD BEEN PLACED  IN  FOSTER
CARE  PURSUANT  TO ARTICLE THREE, SEVEN, TEN, TEN-A OR TEN-C OF THIS ACT
OR SECTION THREE HUNDRED FIFTY-EIGHT-A OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW OR WHO
HAS BEEN FREED FOR ADOPTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION SIX HUNDRED THIR-
TY-SIX OF THIS  ACT  OR  SECTION  THREE  HUNDRED  EIGHTY-THREE-C,  THREE
HUNDRED  EIGHTY-FOUR  OR  THREE  HUNDRED  EIGHTY-FOUR-B  OF  THE  SOCIAL
SERVICES LAW BUT WHO HAS NOT YET BEEN ADOPTED.
  S 4. This act shall take effect immediately.

Comments

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.

By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.