NY State Senate Bill S2323

Archive: Last Bill Status - In Senate Committee Rules Committee

Introduced
In Committee
On Floor Calendar
- Passed Senate
- Passed Assembly
Delivered to Governor
Signed/Vetoed by Governor

Your Voice

Please enter your contact information

First Name *

Last Name *

Email Address *

A valid email address is required.

Home address search or enter your address manually *

Home address is used to determine the senate district in which you reside. Your support or opposition to this bill is then shared immediately with the senator who represents you.

Optional services from the NY State Senate:

Create an account. An account allows you to officially support or oppose key legislation, sign petitions with a single click, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Include a custom message for your Senator? (Optional)

Enter a message to your senator. Many New Yorkers use this to share the reasoning behind their support or opposition to the bill. Others might share a personal anecdote about how the bill would affect them or people they care about.

Leave this field blank

Actions

view actions (16)

	Assembly Actions - Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Jun 20, 2018	committed to rules
Apr 23, 2018	advanced to third reading
Apr 18, 2018	2nd report cal.
Apr 17, 2018	1st report cal.782
Jan 23, 2018	reported and committed to finance
Jan 03, 2018	referred to local government returned to senate died in assembly
Jun 05, 2017	referred to local governments delivered to assembly passed senate
May 08, 2017	advanced to third reading
May 03, 2017	2nd report cal.
May 02, 2017	1st report cal.748
Feb 14, 2017	reported and committed to finance
Jan 13, 2017	referred to local government

Votes

view votes

Apr 17, 2018 - Finance committee Vote

S2323

committee

Aye

Nay

Aye with Reservations

Absent

Excused

Abstained

Jan 23, 2018 - Local Government committee Vote

S2323

committee

Aye

Nay

Aye with Reservations

Absent

Excused

Abstained

Jun 5, 2017 - floor Vote

S2323

floor

Aye

Nay

Absent

Excused

Abstained

May 2, 2017 - Finance committee Vote

S2323

committee

Aye

Nay

Aye with Reservations

Absent

Excused

Abstained

Feb 14, 2017 - Local Government committee Vote

S2323

committee

Aye

Nay

Aye with Reservations

Absent

Excused

Abstained

Co-Sponsors

view additional co-sponsors

S2323 (ACTIVE) - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A2922
Current Committee:: Senate Rules
Law Section:: General Municipal Law
Laws Affected:: Add §25, Gen Muni L; add §1527-a, Ed L
Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:: 2013-2014: S1294, A4861
2015-2016: S2295, A2338
2019-2020: S2017
2021-2022: S3814
2023-2024: S1444

S2323 (ACTIVE) - Summary

Requires that the state fund any program which imposes a mandate upon municipal corporations or school districts; establishes criteria for any exemption from such law if such mandate is ordered by the judiciary, pursuant to an executive order or requested by the locality; expands the reporting requirements of the mandate relief council.

S2323 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

 BILL NUMBER:  S2323

 TITLE OF BILL :

An act to amend the general municipal law and the education law, in
relation to prohibiting the establishment of certain programs mandated
for municipal corporations and school districts unless such programs
are fully funded by the state

 PURPOSE :

Requires any state mandated program imposed on municipalities and
school districts to be funded by the state.

 SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS :

Section 1. The general municipal law is amended by adding a new
section 25 which specifically defines "mandate", "unfunded mandate",
and "net additional cost" in relation to state funding of school
programs.

Section 2. The education law is amended by adding a new section 1527-a
which states that no unfunded mandate shall be enacted which creates a
net additional cost to any school district. In addition, this section
explains the circumstances under which the state would not be required
to fund any mandate for a school district, such as a mandate required

by a court order or legislation requested by the school district.

Section 3. Sets forth the effective date.

 JUSTIFICATION :

State mandated programs place local taxpayers and local officials in
the position of paying for services that they do not control. State
mandated programs allow the state rather than local officials to set
priorities for the locality. In turn, this forces municipalities to
levy more taxes on its residents in order to pay for these state
mandated programs.

This bill requires programs that originate from the state to be paid
for by the state and not have the burden to find funding fall upon
local municipalities. This bill seeks to protect local municipalities
and school districts from unfunded mandates and allow local officials
to set priorities for their own area.

 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY :

2015-16 - S. 2295 Passed Senate/A. 2338a - Local Government Committee.
2013 - S. 1294a Passed Senate/A. 4861 - Local Government Committee.

 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS :

To be determined.

 EFFECTIVE DATE :
This act shall take effect immediately. Sections one and two of this
act shall apply to mandates enacted on or after such effective date.

S2323 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf


                    S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________

                                  2323

                       2017-2018 Regular Sessions

                            I N  S E N A T E

                            January 13, 2017
                               ___________

Introduced by Sens. GRIFFO, AKSHAR, CROCI, DeFRANCISCO, FUNKE, GALLIVAN,
  HANNON,   LATIMER,   MARCHIONE,  MURPHY,  O'MARA,  ORTT,  RANZENHOFER,
  RITCHIE, ROBACH, SERINO, SEWARD -- read twice and ordered printed, and
  when printed to be committed to the Committee on Local Government

AN ACT to amend the general municipal law  and  the  education  law,  in
  relation to prohibiting the establishment of certain programs mandated
  for  municipal  corporations and school districts unless such programs
  are fully funded by the state

  THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  Section  1.    The  general  municipal  law is amended by adding a new
section 25 to read as follows:
  § 25. FUNDING OF MANDATES. 1. DEFINITIONS. AS USED  IN  THIS  SECTION,
THE FOLLOWING TERMS SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING MEANINGS UNLESS THE CONTEXT
SHALL OTHERWISE REQUIRE:
  (A) "MANDATE" MEANS:
  (I)  ANY STATE LAW, RULE OR REGULATION WHICH ESTABLISHES A NEW PROGRAM
OR REQUIRES A HIGHER LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR AN EXISTING  PROGRAM  WHICH  A
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE; OR
  (II)  ANY  PROVISION  OF  GENERAL  LAW WHICH GRANTS A NEW PROPERTY TAX
EXEMPTION OR ABATEMENT OR INCREASES AN EXISTING PROPERTY  TAX  EXEMPTION
OR ABATEMENT WHICH A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE.
  (B) "UNFUNDED MANDATE" SHALL MEAN:
  (I)  ANY STATE LAW, RULE OR REGULATION WHICH ESTABLISHES A NEW PROGRAM
OR REQUIRES A HIGHER LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR AN EXISTING  PROGRAM  WHICH  A
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE, AND WHICH RESULTS IN A NET
ADDITIONAL COST TO SUCH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION;
  (II) ANY ALTERATION IN FUNDING PROVIDED TO A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR
THE  PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE COSTS OF A PROGRAM WHICH IT IS REQUIRED TO
PROVIDE, THEREBY RESULTING IN A NET ADDITIONAL COST  TO  SUCH  MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION; OR

 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                      [ ] is old law to be omitted.

                                                           LBD01969-01-7

S. 2323                             2

  (III)  ANY  PROVISION  OF  GENERAL LAW WHICH GRANTS A NEW PROPERTY TAX
EXEMPTION OR ABATEMENT OR INCREASES AN EXISTING PROPERTY  TAX  EXEMPTION
OR  ABATEMENT  WHICH  ANY  MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE,
THEREBY RESULTING IN A NET ADDITIONAL  COST  TO  SUCH  MUNICIPAL  CORPO-
RATION.
  (C)  "NET  ADDITIONAL COST" MEANS THE INCREASED COST OR COSTS INCURRED
OR ANTICIPATED TO BE INCURRED WITHIN A ONE YEAR PERIOD  BY  A  MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION  IN  PERFORMING OR ADMINISTERING A MANDATE AFTER SUBTRACTING
THEREFROM ANY REVENUES RECEIVED OR RECEIVABLE BY SUCH  MUNICIPAL  CORPO-
RATION  ON ACCOUNT OF THE MANDATED PROGRAM OR SERVICE, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO:
  (I) FEES CHARGED TO THE RECIPIENTS OF THE MANDATED PROGRAM OR SERVICE;
  (II) STATE OR  FEDERAL  AID  PAID  SPECIFICALLY  OR  CATEGORICALLY  IN
CONNECTION WITH THE PROGRAM OR SERVICE; AND
  (III)  AN  OFFSETTING  SAVINGS RESULTING FROM THE DIMINUTION OR ELIMI-
NATION OF ANY OTHER PROGRAM OR  SERVICE  DIRECTLY  ATTRIBUTABLE  TO  THE
PERFORMANCE OR ADMINISTRATION OF THE MANDATED PROGRAM.
  2.  FUNDING  OF  MUNICIPAL  CORPORATION  MANDATES. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY
OTHER PROVISION OF LAW TO THE CONTRARY, NO  UNFUNDED  MANDATE  SHALL  BE
ENACTED  WHICH  CREATES  AN  INCREASED ANNUAL NET ADDITIONAL COST TO ANY
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION.  EACH MANDATE WHICH IMPOSES A NET ADDITIONAL COST
UPON A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL PROVIDE FOR COMPENSATION  OR  FUNDING
BY  THE  STATE OF THE FULL AMOUNT OF THE NET ADDITIONAL COST THEREOF. IN
THE EVENT SUCH COMPENSATION OR FUNDING  IS  NOT  PROVIDED,  THE  MANDATE
SHALL BE VOID.
  3.  EXEMPTIONS  TO  THE  FUNDING  OF  MUNICIPAL  CORPORATION  MANDATES
REQUIREMENT. (A) THE STATE SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO FUND ANY MANDATE IF:
  (I) THE MANDATE IS REQUIRED BY A COURT ORDER OR JUDGMENT;
  (II) THE MANDATE IS PROVIDED AT THE OPTION  OF  THE  LOCAL  GOVERNMENT
UNDER  A  LAW,  REGULATION, RULE OR ORDER THAT IS PERMISSIVE RATHER THAN
MANDATORY;
  (III) THE MANDATE RESULTS FROM THE ENACTMENT OF LEGISLATION  REQUESTED
BY THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN A HOME RULE MESSAGE REQUESTING AUTHORITY
TO  IMPLEMENT  THE  PROGRAM OR SERVICE SPECIFIED IN THE STATUTE, AND THE
STATUTE  IMPOSES  COSTS  ONLY  UPON  THAT  MUNICIPAL  CORPORATION  WHICH
REQUESTS THE AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT THE PROGRAM OR SERVICE;
  (IV) THE MANDATE IS REQUIRED BY, OR ARISES FROM, AN EXECUTIVE ORDER OF
THE GOVERNOR EXERCISING HIS OR HER EMERGENCY POWERS; OR
  (V)  THE MANDATE IS REQUIRED BY STATUTE OR EXECUTIVE ORDER THAT IMPLE-
MENTS A FEDERAL LAW OR REGULATION AND RESULTS FROM COSTS MANDATED BY THE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO BE BORNE AT THE LOCAL LEVEL, UNLESS THE STATUTE OR
EXECUTIVE ORDER RESULTS IN COSTS WHICH EXCEED THE COSTS MANDATED BY  THE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
  (B)  EVERY  STATUTE,  RULE  OR REGULATION ESTABLISHING A MANDATE SHALL
PROVIDE THAT THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ANY SUCH MANDATE IMPOSED ON MUNICIPAL
CORPORATIONS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE NEEDS OF THE STATE AND MUNICI-
PAL CORPORATIONS TO PLAN IMPLEMENTATION THEREOF AND BE  CONSISTENT  WITH
THE AVAILABILITY OF REQUIRED FUNDS.
  §  2.  The  education law is amended by adding a new section 1527-a to
read as follows:
  § 1527-A. FUNDING OF MANDATES IMPOSED ON SCHOOL DISTRICTS. 1.    DEFI-
NITIONS.  AS  USED  IN  THIS SECTION, THE FOLLOWING TERMS SHALL HAVE THE
FOLLOWING MEANINGS UNLESS THE CONTEXT SHALL OTHERWISE REQUIRE:
  (A) "MANDATE" MEANS:

S. 2323                             3

  (I) ANY STATE LAW, RULE OR REGULATION WHICH ESTABLISHES A NEW  PROGRAM
OR  REQUIRES  A  HIGHER LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR AN EXISTING PROGRAM WHICH A
SCHOOL DISTRICT IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE; OR
  (II)  ANY  PROVISION  OF  GENERAL  LAW WHICH GRANTS A NEW PROPERTY TAX
EXEMPTION OR ABATEMENT OR INCREASES AN EXISTING PROPERTY  TAX  EXEMPTION
OR ABATEMENT WHICH A SCHOOL DISTRICT IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE.
  (B) "UNFUNDED MANDATE" SHALL MEAN:
  (I)  ANY STATE LAW, RULE OR REGULATION WHICH ESTABLISHES A NEW PROGRAM
OR REQUIRES A HIGHER LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR AN EXISTING  PROGRAM  WHICH  A
SCHOOL  DISTRICT IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE AND WHICH RESULTS IN A NET ADDI-
TIONAL COST TO SUCH SCHOOL DISTRICT;
  (II) ANY ALTERATION IN FUNDING PROVIDED TO A SCHOOL DISTRICT  FOR  THE
PURPOSE  OF  DEFRAYING  THE  COSTS  OF A PROGRAM WHICH IT IS REQUIRED TO
PROVIDE, THEREBY RESULTING IN A  NET  ADDITIONAL  COST  TO  SUCH  SCHOOL
DISTRICT; OR
  (III)  ANY  PROVISION  OF  GENERAL LAW WHICH GRANTS A NEW PROPERTY TAX
EXEMPTION OR ABATEMENT OR INCREASES AN EXISTING PROPERTY  TAX  EXEMPTION
OR  ABATEMENT  WHICH  A  SCHOOL DISTRICT IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE, THEREBY
RESULTING IN A NET ADDITIONAL COST TO SUCH SCHOOL DISTRICT.
  (C) "NET ADDITIONAL COST" MEANS THE INCREASED COST OR  COSTS  INCURRED
OR  ANTICIPATED  TO  BE  INCURRED  WITHIN  A ONE YEAR PERIOD BY A SCHOOL
DISTRICT IN PERFORMING OR  ADMINISTERING  A  MANDATE  AFTER  SUBTRACTING
THEREFROM ANY REVENUES RECEIVED OR RECEIVABLE BY SUCH SCHOOL DISTRICT ON
ACCOUNT  OF  THE  MANDATED PROGRAM OR SERVICE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
TO:
  (I) FEES CHARGED TO THE RECIPIENTS OF THE MANDATED PROGRAM OR SERVICE;
  (II) STATE OR  FEDERAL  AID  PAID  SPECIFICALLY  OR  CATEGORICALLY  IN
CONNECTION WITH THE PROGRAM OR SERVICE; AND
  (III)  AN  OFFSETTING  SAVINGS RESULTING FROM THE DIMINUTION OR ELIMI-
NATION OF ANY OTHER PROGRAM OR  SERVICE  DIRECTLY  ATTRIBUTABLE  TO  THE
PERFORMANCE OR ADMINISTRATION OF THE MANDATED PROGRAM.
  2.  FUNDING  OF  SCHOOL  DISTRICT  MANDATES. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER
PROVISION OF LAW TO THE CONTRARY, NO UNFUNDED MANDATE SHALL  BE  ENACTED
WHICH  CREATES  A  NET  ADDITIONAL  COST  TO ANY SCHOOL DISTRICT.   EACH
MANDATE WHICH IMPOSES A NET ADDITIONAL COST UPON A SCHOOL DISTRICT SHALL
PROVIDE FOR COMPENSATION OR FUNDING BY THE STATE OF THE FULL  AMOUNT  OF
THE  NET  ADDITIONAL  COSTS  THEREOF.  IN THE EVENT SUCH COMPENSATION OR
FUNDING IS NOT PROVIDED, THE MANDATE SHALL BE VOID.
  3. EXEMPTIONS TO THE FUNDING OF SCHOOL DISTRICT MANDATES  REQUIREMENT.
(A)  THE  STATE  SHALL  NOT  BE  REQUIRED TO FUND ANY MANDATE FOR SCHOOL
DISTRICTS IF:
  (I) THE MANDATE IS REQUIRED BY A COURT ORDER OR JUDGMENT;
  (II) THE MANDATE IS PROVIDED AT THE  OPTION  OF  THE  SCHOOL  DISTRICT
UNDER  A  LAW,  REGULATION, RULE OR ORDER THAT IS PERMISSIVE RATHER THAN
MANDATORY;
  (III) THE MANDATE RESULTS FROM THE ENACTMENT OF LEGISLATION  REQUESTED
BY  THE  SCHOOL  DISTRICT IN A HOME RULE MESSAGE REQUESTING AUTHORITY TO
IMPLEMENT THE PROGRAM OR SERVICE SPECIFIED IN THE STATUTE, AND THE STAT-
UTE IMPOSES COSTS ONLY UPON THAT  SCHOOL  DISTRICT  WHICH  REQUESTS  THE
AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT THE PROGRAM OR SERVICE;
  (IV) THE MANDATE IS REQUIRED BY, OR ARISES FROM, AN EXECUTIVE ORDER OF
THE GOVERNOR EXERCISING HIS OR HER EMERGENCY POWERS; OR
  (V)  THE MANDATE IS REQUIRED BY STATUTE OR EXECUTIVE ORDER THAT IMPLE-
MENTS A FEDERAL LAW OR REGULATION AND RESULTS FROM COSTS MANDATED BY THE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO BE BORNE AT THE LOCAL LEVEL, UNLESS THE STATUTE OR

S. 2323                             4

EXECUTIVE ORDER RESULTS IN COSTS WHICH EXCEED THE COSTS MANDATED BY  THE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
  (B)  EVERY  STATUTE,  RULE  OR REGULATION ESTABLISHING A MANDATE SHALL
PROVIDE THAT THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ANY SUCH MANDATE  IMPOSED  ON  SCHOOL
DISTRICTS  SHALL  BE  CONSISTENT  WITH THE NEEDS OF THE STATE AND SCHOOL
DISTRICTS TO PLAN IMPLEMENTATION THEREOF, AND  BE  CONSISTENT  WITH  THE
AVAILABILITY OF REQUIRED FUNDS.
  §  3.  This act shall take effect immediately and sections one and two
of this act shall apply to mandates enacted on or after  such  effective
date.

Comments

Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.

Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

The New York State Senate

senate Bill S2323

Sponsored By

Archive: Last Bill Status - In Senate Committee Rules Committee

Your Voice

Actions

Votes

Apr 17, 2018 - Finance committee Vote

Finance Committee Vote: Apr 17, 2018

Jan 23, 2018 - Local Government committee Vote

Local Government Committee Vote: Jan 23, 2018

Jun 5, 2017 - floor Vote

Floor Vote: Jun 5, 2017

May 2, 2017 - Finance committee Vote

Finance Committee Vote: May 2, 2017

Feb 14, 2017 - Local Government committee Vote

Local Government Committee Vote: Feb 14, 2017

Co-Sponsors

S2323 (ACTIVE) - Details

S2323 (ACTIVE) - Summary

S2323 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

S2323 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments

senate Bill S2323

Share this bill

Sponsored By

Archive: Last Bill Status - In Senate Committee Rules Committee

Your Voice

Actions

Votes

Apr 17, 2018 - Finance committee Vote

Finance Committee Vote: Apr 17, 2018

Jan 23, 2018 - Local Government committee Vote

Local Government Committee Vote: Jan 23, 2018

Jun 5, 2017 - floor Vote

Floor Vote: Jun 5, 2017

May 2, 2017 - Finance committee Vote

Finance Committee Vote: May 2, 2017

Feb 14, 2017 - Local Government committee Vote

Local Government Committee Vote: Feb 14, 2017

Co-Sponsors

S2323 (ACTIVE) - Details

S2323 (ACTIVE) - Summary

S2323 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

S2323 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments