S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                   7737
 
                        2021-2022 Regular Sessions
 
                           I N  A S S E M B L Y
 
                               May 20, 2021
                                ___________
 
 Introduced  by  M.  of  A.  WEINSTEIN  --  read once and referred to the
   Committee on Judiciary
 
 AN ACT to amend the real property actions and proceedings  law  and  the
   civil  practice  law  and  rules, in relation to the rights of parties
   involved in foreclosure actions

   THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section  1. Subdivision 3 of section 1301 of the real property actions
 and proceedings law, as added by chapter 312 of the  laws  of  1962,  is
 amended and a new subdivision 4 is added to read as follows:
   3.  While the action is pending or after final judgment for the plain-
 tiff therein, no other  action  shall  be  commenced  or  maintained  to
 recover  any  part  of  the mortgage debt, without leave of the court in
 which the former action was brought. THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL  BE  TREATED
 AS  A STAY OR STATUTORY PROHIBITION FOR PURPOSES OF CALCULATING THE TIME
 WITHIN WHICH AN ACTION SHALL  BE  COMMENCED  PURSUANT  TO  SECTIONS  TWO
 HUNDRED  FOUR  AND  TWO  HUNDRED  THIRTEEN OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND
 RULES.
   4. IF AN ACTION TO COLLECT ANY PART OF THE MORTGAGE  DEBT  IS  ADJUDI-
 CATED  TO  BE BARRED BY THE APPLICABLE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS, ANY OTHER
 ACTION SEEKING TO RECOVER ANY PART OF THE SAME MORTGAGE DEBT SHALL  ALSO
 BE BARRED BY THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.
   §  2.  Rule  3217  of  the  civil practice law and rules is amended by
 adding a new subdivision (e) to read as follows:
   (E) EFFECT OF DISCONTINUANCE UPON CERTAIN INSTRUMENTS. IN  ANY  ACTION
 ON AN INSTRUMENT DESCRIBED UNDER SUBDIVISION FOUR OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED
 THIRTEEN OF THIS CHAPTER IN WHICH THE UNDERLYING INDEBTEDNESS WAS ACCEL-
 ERATED  BY THE COMMENCEMENT OF SUCH ACTION, THE VOLUNTARY DISCONTINUANCE
 OF SUCH ACTION, WHETHER ON MOTION OR BY STIPULATION, SHALL NOT HAVE  THE
 EFFECT  OF  REVOKING ACCELERATION UNLESS SUCH DISCONTINUANCE IS EFFECTED
 WITHIN SIX YEARS OF  THE  COMMENCEMENT  OF  THE  ACTION  AND  EXPLICITLY
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.
              

                                                            LBD11254-02-1

 A. 7737                             2
 
 ADVISES  THE  DEFENDANT  OR DEFENDANTS THAT SUCH ACCELERATION IS REVOKED
 AND ADVISES THE DEFENDANT OR DEFENDANTS THAT THE PLAINTIFF SHALL  RESUME
 ACCEPTING INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS.
   §  3.  Subdivision  (c)  of  section 205 of the civil practice law and
 rules, as amended by chapter 216 of the laws of 1992, is amended to read
 as follows:
   (c) Application. This section also applies  to  a  proceeding  brought
 under  the workers' compensation law BUT SHALL NOT APPLY TO ANY PROCEED-
 ING GOVERNED BY SECTION TWO HUNDRED FIVE-A OF THIS ARTICLE.
   § 4. The civil practice law and rules  is  amended  by  adding  a  new
 section 205-a to read as follows:
   § 205-A. TERMINATION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS RELATED TO REAL PROPERTY.  (A)
 IF  AN  ACTION  UPON  AN  INSTRUMENT DESCRIBED UNDER SUBDIVISION FOUR OF
 SECTION TWO HUNDRED THIRTEEN OF THIS ARTICLE IS TIMELY COMMENCED AND  IS
 TERMINATED  IN ANY MANNER OTHER THAN A VOLUNTARY DISCONTINUANCE, A FAIL-
 URE TO OBTAIN PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER THE DEFENDANT, A  DISMISSAL  OF
 THE  COMPLAINT  FOR  ANY  FORM OF NEGLECT, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO
 THOSE SPECIFIED IN SUBDIVISION THREE OF SECTION THIRTY-ONE HUNDRED TWEN-
 TY-SIX, SECTION THIRTY-TWO  HUNDRED  FIFTEEN,  RULE  THIRTY-TWO  HUNDRED
 SIXTEEN AND RULE THIRTY-FOUR HUNDRED FOUR OF THIS CHAPTER, FOR VIOLATION
 OF  ANY  UNIFORM  COURT  RULES  OR INDIVIDUAL PART RULES, FOR FAILURE TO
 COMPLY WITH ANY COURT SCHEDULING ORDERS, OR BY DEFAULT DUE TO NONAPPEAR-
 ANCE FOR CONFERENCE OR AT A CALENDAR  CALL,  OR  BY  FAILURE  TO  TIMELY
 SUBMIT  ANY ORDER OR JUDGMENT, OR UPON A FINAL JUDGMENT UPON THE MERITS,
 THE PLAINTIFF, OR, IF  THE  PLAINTIFF  DIES  AND  THE  CAUSE  OF  ACTION
 SURVIVES,  HIS  OR  HER  EXECUTOR  OR  ADMINISTRATOR, MAY COMMENCE A NEW
 ACTION UPON THE SAME TRANSACTION OR OCCURRENCE OR SERIES OF TRANSACTIONS
 OR OCCURRENCES WITHIN SIX MONTHS  FOLLOWING  THE  TERMINATION,  PROVIDED
 THAT THE NEW ACTION WOULD HAVE BEEN TIMELY COMMENCED WITHIN THE APPLICA-
 BLE LIMITATIONS PERIOD PRESCRIBED BY LAW AT THE TIME OF THE COMMENCEMENT
 OF  THE  PRIOR  ACTION  AND  THAT SERVICE UPON THE ORIGINAL DEFENDANT IS
 EFFECTED WITHIN SUCH SIX-MONTH PERIOD. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SUBDIVISION:
   1. AN ASSIGNEE OF THE PLAINTIFF SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO  HAVE  CAPACITY
 TO  MAINTAIN  THE  ACTION  AS A SUCCESSOR PLAINTIFF, UNLESS PLEADING AND
 PROVING THAT SUCH ASSIGNEE IS ACTING  ON  BEHALF  OF  OR  ASSERTING  THE
 RIGHTS OF THE ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF; AND
   2.  IN  NO  EVENT  SHALL THE PLAINTIFF RECEIVE MORE THAN ONE SIX-MONTH
 EXTENSION.
   (B) WHERE THE DEFENDANT HAS SERVED AN ANSWER AND THE  ACTION  UPON  AN
 INSTRUMENT DESCRIBED UNDER SUBDIVISION FOUR OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED THIR-
 TEEN  OF THIS ARTICLE IS TERMINATED IN ANY MANNER, AND A NEW ACTION UPON
 THE SAME TRANSACTION OR OCCURRENCE OR SERIES OF TRANSACTIONS  OR  OCCUR-
 RENCES  IS COMMENCED BY THE ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF, OR A SUCCESSOR IN INTER-
 EST OR ASSIGNEE OF THE ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF, THE ASSERTION OF ANY CAUSE OF
 ACTION OR DEFENSE BY THE DEFENDANT IN THE NEW ACTION SHALL BE TIMELY  IF
 SUCH CAUSE OF ACTION OR DEFENSE WAS TIMELY ASSERTED IN THE PRIOR ACTION.
   § 5. This act shall take effect immediately.

                            
 
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                  7737--A
 
                        2021-2022 Regular Sessions
 
                           I N  A S S E M B L Y
 
                               May 20, 2021
                                ___________
 
 Introduced  by  M.  of  A.  WEINSTEIN  --  read once and referred to the
   Committee on Judiciary -- reported and referred to  the  Committee  on
   Rules  --  Rules Committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted
   as amended and recommitted to the Committee on Rules
 
 AN ACT to amend the real property actions and proceedings  law  and  the
   civil  practice  law  and  rules, in relation to the rights of parties
   involved in foreclosure actions
 
   THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section  1. Subdivision 3 of section 1301 of the real property actions
 and proceedings law, as added by chapter 312 of the  laws  of  1962,  is
 amended and a new subdivision 4 is added to read as follows:
   3.  While the action is pending or after final judgment for the plain-
 tiff therein, no other  action  shall  be  commenced  or  maintained  to
 recover  any  part  of  the mortgage debt, without leave of the court in
 which the former action was  brought.  THIS  SUBDIVISION  SHALL  NOT  BE
 TREATED  AS  A STAY OR STATUTORY PROHIBITION FOR PURPOSES OF CALCULATING
 THE TIME WITHIN WHICH AN ACTION SHALL BE COMMENCED PURSUANT TO  SECTIONS
 TWO  HUNDRED FOUR AND TWO HUNDRED THIRTEEN OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND
 RULES.
   4. IF AN ACTION TO COLLECT ANY PART OF THE MORTGAGE  DEBT  IS  ADJUDI-
 CATED  TO  BE BARRED BY THE APPLICABLE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS, ANY OTHER
 ACTION SEEKING TO RECOVER ANY PART OF THE SAME MORTGAGE DEBT SHALL  ALSO
 BE BARRED BY THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.
   §  2.  Rule  3217  of  the  civil practice law and rules is amended by
 adding a new subdivision (e) to read as follows:
   (E) EFFECT OF DISCONTINUANCE UPON CERTAIN INSTRUMENTS. IN  ANY  ACTION
 ON AN INSTRUMENT DESCRIBED UNDER SUBDIVISION FOUR OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED
 THIRTEEN OF THIS CHAPTER IN WHICH THE UNDERLYING INDEBTEDNESS WAS ACCEL-
 ERATED  BY THE COMMENCEMENT OF SUCH ACTION, THE VOLUNTARY DISCONTINUANCE
 OF SUCH ACTION, WHETHER ON MOTION OR BY STIPULATION, SHALL NOT HAVE  THE
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.
              

                                                            LBD11254-03-1

 A. 7737--A                          2
 
 EFFECT  OF  REVOKING ACCELERATION UNLESS SUCH DISCONTINUANCE IS EFFECTED
 WITHIN SIX YEARS OF  THE  COMMENCEMENT  OF  THE  ACTION  AND  EXPLICITLY
 ADVISES  THE  DEFENDANT  OR DEFENDANTS THAT SUCH ACCELERATION IS REVOKED
 AND  ADVISES THE DEFENDANT OR DEFENDANTS THAT THE PLAINTIFF SHALL RESUME
 ACCEPTING INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS.
   § 3. Subdivision (c) of section 205 of  the  civil  practice  law  and
 rules, as amended by chapter 216 of the laws of 1992, is amended to read
 as follows:
   (c)  Application.  This  section  also applies to a proceeding brought
 under the workers' compensation law BUT SHALL NOT APPLY TO ANY  PROCEED-
 ING GOVERNED BY SECTION TWO HUNDRED FIVE-A OF THIS ARTICLE.
   §  4.  The  civil  practice  law  and rules is amended by adding a new
 section 205-a to read as follows:
   § 205-A. TERMINATION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS RELATED TO REAL PROPERTY.  (A)
 IF AN ACTION UPON AN INSTRUMENT  DESCRIBED  UNDER  SUBDIVISION  FOUR  OF
 SECTION  TWO HUNDRED THIRTEEN OF THIS ARTICLE IS TIMELY COMMENCED AND IS
 TERMINATED IN ANY MANNER OTHER THAN A VOLUNTARY DISCONTINUANCE, A  FAIL-
 URE  TO  OBTAIN PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER THE DEFENDANT, A DISMISSAL OF
 THE COMPLAINT FOR ANY FORM OF NEGLECT, INCLUDING,  BUT  NOT  LIMITED  TO
 THOSE SPECIFIED IN SUBDIVISION THREE OF SECTION THIRTY-ONE HUNDRED TWEN-
 TY-SIX,  SECTION  THIRTY-TWO  HUNDRED  FIFTEEN,  RULE THIRTY-TWO HUNDRED
 SIXTEEN AND RULE THIRTY-FOUR HUNDRED FOUR OF THIS CHAPTER, FOR VIOLATION
 OF ANY UNIFORM COURT RULES OR INDIVIDUAL  PART  RULES,  FOR  FAILURE  TO
 COMPLY WITH ANY COURT SCHEDULING ORDERS, OR BY DEFAULT DUE TO NONAPPEAR-
 ANCE  FOR  CONFERENCE  OR  AT  A  CALENDAR CALL, OR BY FAILURE TO TIMELY
 SUBMIT ANY ORDER OR JUDGMENT, OR UPON A FINAL JUDGMENT UPON THE  MERITS,
 THE  PLAINTIFF,  OR,  IF  THE  PLAINTIFF  DIES  AND  THE CAUSE OF ACTION
 SURVIVES, HIS OR HER EXECUTOR  OR  ADMINISTRATOR,  MAY  COMMENCE  A  NEW
 ACTION UPON THE SAME TRANSACTION OR OCCURRENCE OR SERIES OF TRANSACTIONS
 OR  OCCURRENCES  WITHIN  SIX  MONTHS FOLLOWING THE TERMINATION, PROVIDED
 THAT THE NEW ACTION WOULD HAVE BEEN TIMELY COMMENCED WITHIN THE APPLICA-
 BLE LIMITATIONS PERIOD PRESCRIBED BY LAW AT THE TIME OF THE COMMENCEMENT
 OF THE PRIOR ACTION AND THAT SERVICE  UPON  THE  ORIGINAL  DEFENDANT  IS
 EFFECTED WITHIN SUCH SIX-MONTH PERIOD. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SUBDIVISION:
   1.  AN  ASSIGNEE OF THE PLAINTIFF SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO HAVE CAPACITY
 TO MAINTAIN THE ACTION AS A SUCCESSOR  PLAINTIFF,  UNLESS  PLEADING  AND
 PROVING  THAT  SUCH  ASSIGNEE  IS  ACTING  ON BEHALF OF OR ASSERTING THE
 RIGHTS OF THE ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF; AND
   2. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE PLAINTIFF RECEIVE  MORE  THAN  ONE  SIX-MONTH
 EXTENSION.
   (B)  WHERE  THE  DEFENDANT HAS SERVED AN ANSWER AND THE ACTION UPON AN
 INSTRUMENT DESCRIBED UNDER SUBDIVISION FOUR OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED THIR-
 TEEN OF THIS ARTICLE IS TERMINATED IN ANY MANNER, AND A NEW ACTION  UPON
 THE  SAME  TRANSACTION OR OCCURRENCE OR SERIES OF TRANSACTIONS OR OCCUR-
 RENCES IS COMMENCED BY THE ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF, OR A SUCCESSOR IN  INTER-
 EST OR ASSIGNEE OF THE ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF, THE ASSERTION OF ANY CAUSE OF
 ACTION  OR DEFENSE BY THE DEFENDANT IN THE NEW ACTION SHALL BE TIMELY IF
 SUCH CAUSE OF ACTION OR DEFENSE WAS TIMELY ASSERTED IN THE PRIOR ACTION.
   § 5. This act shall take effect immediately.