NY State Senate Bill 2025-S1139

Senate Bill S1139

2025-2026 Legislative Session

Relates to requiring governmental entities to implement multifactor authentication for local and remote network access

download bill text pdf

Current Bill Status - In Assembly Committee

Introduced
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
Delivered to Governor
Signed By Governor

Please enter your contact information

First Name

Last Name

Email Address

A valid email address is required.

Home address is used to determine the senate district in which you reside. Your support or opposition to this bill is then shared immediately with the senator who represents you.

Optional services from the NY State Senate:

Create an account. An account allows you to officially support or oppose key legislation, sign petitions with a single click, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Include a custom message for your Senator? (Optional)

Enter a message to your senator. Many New Yorkers use this to share the reasoning behind their support or opposition to the bill. Others might share a personal anecdote about how the bill would affect them or people they care about.

Actions

View Actions

	Assembly Actions - Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Jun 11, 2025	referred to ways and means delivered to assembly passed senate
Jun 04, 2025	advanced to third reading
May 29, 2025	2nd report cal.
May 28, 2025	1st report cal.1343
Feb 10, 2025	reported and committed to finance
Jan 08, 2025	referred to internet and technology

Votes

- Jun 11, 2025 - Floor Vote
  S1139
  
  55
  
  Aye
  
  4
  
  Nay
  
  0
  
  Absent
  
  4
  
  Excused
  
  0
  
  Abstained
  - - Floor Vote: Jun 11, 2025
      
      aye (55)
      
      Addabbo Jr.
      
      Ashby
      
      Bailey
      
      Baskin
      
      Brisport
      
      Bynoe
      
      Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick
      
      Chan
      
      Cleare
      
      Comrie
      
      Cooney
      
      Fahy
      
      Fernandez
      
      Gallivan
      
      Gianaris
      
      Gonzalez
      
      Gounardes
      
      Griffo
      
      Harckham
      
      Helming
      
      Hoylman-Sigal
      
      Jackson
      
      Kavanagh
      
      Krueger
      
      Lanza
      
      Liu
      
      Martinez
      
      Martins
      
      Mattera
      
      May
      
      Mayer
      
      O'Mara
      
      Oberacker
      
      Ortt
      
      Palumbo
      
      Parker
      
      Persaud
      
      Ramos
      
      Rhoads
      
      Rivera
      
      Rolison
      
      Ryan
      
      Salazar
      
      Sanders Jr.
      
      Scarcella-Spanton
      
      Sepúlveda
      
      Serrano
      
      Skoufis
      
      Stavisky
      
      Stec
      
      Stewart-Cousins
      
      Tedisco
      
      Webb
      
      Weber
      
      Weik
      
      nay (4)
      
      Borrello
      
      Hinchey
      
      Ryan
      
      Walczyk
      
      excused (4)
      
      Brouk
      
      Murray
      
      Myrie
      
      Sutton
  Feb 10, 2025 - Internet And Technology Committee Vote
  S1139
  
  5
  
  Aye
  
  1
  
  Nay
  
  1
  
  Aye with Reservations
  
  0
  
  Absent
  
  0
  
  Excused
  
  0
  
  Abstained
  - - Internet And Technology Committee Vote: Feb 10, 2025
      
      aye (5)
      
      Gonzalez
      
      Gounardes
      
      Hinchey
      
      Parker
      
      Ryan
      
      nay (1)
      
      Walczyk
      
      aye wr (1)
      
      Stec
  May 28, 2025 - Finance Committee Vote
  S1139
  
  17
  
  Aye
  
  2
  
  Nay
  
  3
  
  Aye with Reservations
  
  0
  
  Absent
  
  0
  
  Excused
  
  0
  
  Abstained
  - - Finance Committee Vote: May 28, 2025
      
      aye (17)
      
      Bailey
      
      Comrie
      
      Cooney
      
      Gallivan
      
      Gounardes
      
      Griffo
      
      Krueger
      
      Liu
      
      Mayer
      
      Oberacker
      
      Parker
      
      Ramos
      
      Rivera
      
      Salazar
      
      Skoufis
      
      Stavisky
      
      Weber
      
      nay (2)
      
      Borrello
      
      Hinchey
      
      aye wr (3)
      
      Helming
      
      O'Mara
      
      Sepúlveda

2025-S1139 (ACTIVE) - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A6347
Current Committee:: Assembly Ways And Means
Law Section:: State Technology Law
Laws Affected:: Amd §202, add §§210 - 212, St Tech L
Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:: 2021-2022: S2652
2023-2024: S6474, A7331

2025-S1139 (ACTIVE) - Summary

Requires governmental entities to, whenever possible and feasible, consider implementing multifactor authentication for local and remote network access; requires public websites to encrypt all exchanges and to comply with privacy standards.

2025-S1139 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

                                 
BILL NUMBER: S1139

SPONSOR: GONZALEZ
 
TITLE OF BILL:

An act to amend the state technology law, in relation to requiring
governmental entities to implement multifactor authentication for local
and remote network access

 
PURPOSE:

Amends the State Technology Law to require all government entities in
the State to require muttifactor authentication for access to the serv-
ers, email or official applications used by their employees or agents.

 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section 1 adds new subdivisions 9 and 10 to Section 202 of the State
Technology Law, which sets definitions for the terms "governmental enti-
ty" and "muttifactor authentication."

Section 2 adds new sections 210, 211, and 212 to the state technology

law.

Section 210 adds multifactor authentication requirements and provides
for technical standards and waivers.

Section 211 adds privacy requirements regarding the use of multifactor
authentication using biometric information.

Section 212 adds encryption requirements for all government websites.

Section 3 sets the effective date.

 
JUSTIFICATION:

Cyberattacks on public entities are occurring with increasing frequency.
In  Microsoft's  2021  cybersecurity  report,  48%  of all cybersecurity
attacks targeted government entities. Since 2017, more than 3,600 local,
state, and tribal governments across the country have been  targeted  by
ransomware  hackers,  which  is  just one type of cyberattack. Lapses in
cybersecurity could require  the  state's  most  essential  services  to
decide between paying expensive ransoms or losing access to systems.

Muttifactor  authentication  (MFA)  can significantly reduce the vulner-
ability of public systems. According to Google, multifactor can  prevent
100% of automated bots, up to 99% of bulk phishing attacks and up to 90%
of  targeted  attacks.  According to Microsoft, an account is 99.9% less
likely to be compromised when using MFA. Therefore requiring the use  of
MFA  at  sensitive  governmental  institutions  is an important step the
state can take to improve its cybersecurity preparedness.

Importantly, MFA is cost effective to implement due to the  connectivity
of  devices and web applications. Requiring governmental agencies to use
this technology is a low-cost  proposition  that  can  greatly  increase
protection against cyberattacks.

 
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

2023-2024:  S6474A:  Amended  and  Recommitted to Finance; A7331B: Third
Reading

2021-2022:  New  bill S2652; referred to Internet and Technology Commit-
tee; referred to Finance

 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

To be determined.

 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect one year after becoming law.

2025-S1139 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

                             
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                   1139
 
                        2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                              January 8, 2025
                                ___________
 
 Introduced  by Sen. GONZALEZ -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
   printed to be committed to the Committee on Internet and Technology
 
 AN ACT to amend the state  technology  law,  in  relation  to  requiring
   governmental  entities  to  implement  multifactor  authentication for
   local and remote network access

   THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section  1.  Section  202  of  the  state technology law is amended by
 adding two new subdivisions 9 and 10 to read as follows:
   9. "GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY" SHALL MEAN ANY  STATE  OR  LOCAL  DEPARTMENT,
 BOARD,  BUREAU, DIVISION, COMMISSION, COMMITTEE, SCHOOL DISTRICT, PUBLIC
 AUTHORITY, PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION, COUNCIL OR OFFICE, INCLUDING  ALL
 ENTITIES  DEFINED PURSUANT TO SECTION TWO OF THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES LAW.
 SUCH TERM SHALL INCLUDE THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK  AND  THE  CITY
 UNIVERSITY  OF  NEW  YORK.  FURTHER, SUCH TERM SHALL INCLUDE ANY COUNTY,
 CITY, TOWN OR VILLAGE BUT SHALL NOT INCLUDE THE JUDICIARY OR  STATE  AND
 LOCAL LEGISLATURES.
   10.  "MULTIFACTOR AUTHENTICATION" SHALL MEAN USING TWO OR MORE DIFFER-
 ENT TYPES OF IDENTIFICATION CREDENTIALS TO ACHIEVE  AUTHENTICATION.  THE
 TYPES OF IDENTIFICATION CREDENTIALS SHALL INCLUDE:
   (A)  KNOWLEDGE-BASED CREDENTIALS, WHICH IS A KNOWLEDGE-BASED AUTHENTI-
 CATION THAT REQUIRES THE USER TO PROVIDE INFORMATION THAT THEY KNOW SUCH
 AS PASSWORDS OR PINS;
   (B)  POSSESSION-BASED  CREDENTIALS,  WHICH  IS   AUTHENTICATION   THAT
 REQUIRES  INDIVIDUALS  TO  HAVE  SOMETHING SPECIFIC IN THEIR POSSESSION,
 SUCH AS SECURITY TOKENS, KEY FOBS, SIM CARDS OR SMARTPHONE APPLICATIONS;
 AND
   (C) BIOMETRIC INFORMATION, WHICH IS ANY MEASURABLE  PHYSICAL,  PHYSIO-
 LOGICAL OR BEHAVIORAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT ARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO A PERSON,
 INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO FACIAL CHARACTERISTICS, FINGERPRINT CHARAC-
 TERISTICS,  HAND  CHARACTERISTICS, EYE CHARACTERISTICS, VOCAL CHARACTER-
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                            LBD01038-01-5

 S. 1139                             2
 
 ISTICS, AND ANY OTHER CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAN BE  USED  TO  IDENTIFY  A
 PERSON  INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO:  FINGERPRINTS; HANDPRINTS; RETINA
 AND IRIS PATTERNS; DNA SEQUENCE; VOICE; GAIT; AND FACIAL GEOMETRY.
   §  2. The state technology law is amended by adding three new sections
 210, 211, and 212 to read as follows:
   §  210.  MULTIFACTOR  AUTHENTICATION.  1.  MULTIFACTOR  AUTHENTICATION
 REQUIREMENT.  EVERY  GOVERNMENTAL  ENTITY  SHALL,  WHENEVER POSSIBLE AND
 FEASABLE, CONSIDER IMPLEMENTING MULTIFACTOR AUTHENTICATION FOR LOCAL AND
 REMOTE NETWORK ACCESS TO ANY EMAIL ACCOUNTS, CLOUD STORAGE ACCOUNTS, WEB
 APPLICATIONS, NETWORKS, DATABASES, OR SERVERS, MAINTAINED BY SUCH ENTITY
 OR ON BEHALF OF SUCH ENTITY, FOR THE  EMPLOYEES  AND  OFFICERS  OF  SUCH
 ENTITY  OR  FOR ANY OTHER INDIVIDUALS PROVIDING SERVICES TO OR ON BEHALF
 OF SUCH ENTITY.
   2. TECHNICAL STANDARD. THE OFFICE SHALL PROMULGATE RULES TO  ESTABLISH
 STANDARD  TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES FOR COMPLYING
 WITH SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS SECTION. SUCH  RULES  SHALL  INCLUDE  REGU-
 LATIONS  ADDRESSING  BIOMETRIC  INFORMATION  INCLUDING PROPER STORAGE OF
 TRAITS RELATING TO USER-SPECIFIC BIOLOGICAL TRAITS.   SUCH  RULES  SHALL
 ADDITIONALLY  INCLUDE  PROVISIONS  REGARDING  COMPLIANCE FOR INDIVIDUALS
 WITH DISABILITIES OR SPECIAL NEEDS.  FOR THE PURPOSES OF  THIS  SUBDIVI-
 SION,  THE  OFFICE  MAY  USE AND REFER TO THE GUIDELINES PROVIDED BY THE
 NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY,  THE  FEDERAL  RISK  AND
 AUTHORIZATION  MANAGEMENT  PROGRAM  (FEDRAMP),  THE  FEDERAL INFORMATION
 SECURITY MANAGEMENT ACT OF 2002 (FISMA) AND THE DEFENSE FEDERAL ACQUISI-
 TION REGULATION SUPPLEMENT (DFARS).
   3. WAIVERS. THE OFFICE, UPON APPLICATION BY A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY, MAY
 COMPLETELY OR PARTIALLY WAIVE THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION FOR  SUCH
 GOVERNMENTAL  ENTITY.  SUCH WAIVER SHALL BE VALID FOR NO LONGER THAN TWO
 YEARS AND SHALL BE REAPPROVED AFTER EXPIRATION. THE OFFICE SHALL PROMUL-
 GATE RULES TO ESTABLISH THE APPLICATION PROCESS AND  CRITERIA  FOR  SUCH
 WAIVERS.
   §  211.  PRIVACY  REQUIREMENTS. THIS SECTION SHALL APPLY TO THE USE OF
 MULTIFACTOR AUTHENTICATION AT GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES AND TO  ANY  VENDORS
 AND/OR THIRD-PARTY CONTRACTORS ADMINISTERING THE MULTIFACTOR AUTHENTICA-
 TION ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY.
   1.  NO GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY SHALL REQUIRE THE USE OF BIOMETRIC INFORMA-
 TION TO ACCESS LOCAL AND/OR REMOTE NETWORK ACCESS.
   2. NO GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY THAT FACILITATES THE USE OF BIOMETRIC INFOR-
 MATION TO ACCESS LOCAL AND REMOTE NETWORK ACCESS SHALL SELL OR  MONETIZE
 SUCH DATA.
   3. NO GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY THAT FACILITATES THE USE OF BIOMETRIC INFOR-
 MATION  TO  ACCESS LOCAL AND REMOTE NETWORK ACCESS SHALL SHARE SUCH DATA
 WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT WITHOUT A WARRANT.
   4. ANY GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY AND ANY APPLICABLE THIRD-PARTY  CONTRACTORS
 THAT  FACILITATE  THE USE OF BIOMETRIC INFORMATION SHALL AGREE TO COMPLY
 WITH THE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE OFFICE AND ALL  STATUTORY  PRIVACY
 STANDARDS.
   §  212.  PUBLIC  WEBSITE ENCRYPTION. EVERY WEBSITE MAINTAINED BY OR ON
 BEHALF OF A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY SHALL ENCRYPT ALL EXCHANGES  AND  TRANS-
 FERS  BETWEEN A WEB SERVER, MAINTAINED BY OR ON BEHALF OF A GOVERNMENTAL
 ENTITY, AND A WEB BROWSER OF HYPERTEXT OR OF ELECTRONIC INFORMATION, AND
 REQUIRE WEB BROWSERS TO REQUEST SUCH ENCRYPTED EXCHANGE OR  TRANSFER  AT
 ALL  TIMES FOR SUCH WEBSITES, PROVIDED THAT SUCH ENCRYPTION SHALL NOT BE
 REQUIRED IF SUCH EXCHANGES OR TRANSFERS ARE CONDUCTED IN A  MANNER  THAT
 PROVIDES AT LEAST AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF CONFIDENTIALITY, DATA INTEGRITY
 AND AUTHENTICATION.
 S. 1139                             3
 
   §  3. This act shall take effect one year after it shall have become a
 law. Effective immediately, the addition, amendment,  and/or  repeal  of
 any  rule  or regulation necessary for the implementation of this act on
 its effective date are authorized to be made and completed on or  before
 such effective date.

Comments

Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.

Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Steven_Tryon

6 months ago

Why is this exemption in place in the language of this bill: "...shall not include the judiciary or state and local legislatures"?

Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.