S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
4356
2025-2026 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
February 4, 2025
___________
Introduced by Sen. BAILEY -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Investigations and Govern-
ment Operations
AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to institution of court
actions
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The opening paragraph of subdivision 9 of section 297 of
the executive law, as amended by chapter 140 of the laws of 2022, is
amended to read as follows:
Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an unlawful discriminatory
practice shall have a cause of action in any court of appropriate juris-
diction for damages, including, in cases of employment discrimination
related to private employers and housing discrimination only, punitive
damages, and such other remedies as may be appropriate, including any
civil fines and penalties provided in subdivision four of this section,
unless such person had filed a complaint [hereunder] PURSUANT TO THIS
SECTION or with any local commission on human rights, or with the super-
intendent pursuant to the provisions of section two hundred ninety-six-a
of this article, provided that, where the division has dismissed such
complaint on the grounds of administrative convenience, on the grounds
of untimeliness, or on the grounds that the election of remedies is
annulled, such person shall maintain all rights to bring suit as if no
complaint had been filed with the division AND MAY BRING SUCH SUIT WITH-
IN THREE YEARS AFTER ANY SUCH DISMISSAL FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONVENIENCE.
At any time prior to a hearing before a hearing examiner, a person who
has a complaint pending at the division may request that the division
dismiss the complaint and annul his or her election of remedies so that
the human rights law claim may be pursued in court, and the division
may, upon such request, dismiss the complaint on the grounds that such
person's election of an administrative remedy is annulled. Notwithstand-
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD01734-01-5
S. 4356 2
ing subdivision (a) of section two hundred four of the civil practice
law and rules, if a complaint is so annulled by the division, upon the
request of the party bringing such complaint before the division, such
party's rights to bring such cause of action before a court of appropri-
ate jurisdiction shall be limited by the statute of limitations in
effect in such court at the time the complaint was initially filed with
the division. Any party to a housing discrimination complaint shall have
the right within twenty days following a determination of probable cause
pursuant to subdivision two of this section to elect to have an action
commenced in a civil court, and an attorney representing the division of
human rights [will] SHALL be appointed to present the complaint in
court[,] or, with the consent of the division, the case may be presented
by complainant's attorney. A complaint filed by the equal employment
opportunity commission to comply with the requirements of 42 USC
2000e-5(c) and 42 USC 12117(a) and 29 USC 633(b) shall not constitute
the filing of a complaint within the meaning of this subdivision. No
person who has initiated any action in a court of competent jurisdiction
or who has an action pending before any administrative agency under any
other law of the state based upon an act which would be an unlawful
discriminatory practice under this article, may file a complaint with
respect to the same grievance under this section or under section two
hundred ninety-six-a of this article. In cases of housing discrimination
only, a person whose complaint has been dismissed by the division after
investigation for lack of jurisdiction or lack of probable cause may
file the same cause of action in a court of appropriate jurisdiction
pursuant to this section, unless judicial review of such dismissal has
been sought pursuant to section two hundred ninety-eight of this arti-
cle. The attorney general shall have the power to commence an action or
proceeding in the supreme court of the state of New York, if, upon
information or belief, the attorney general is of the opinion that an
employer has been, is, or is about to violate the provisions regarding
unlawful discriminatory retaliation pursuant to subdivision seven of
section two hundred ninety-six of this article. Nothing in this section
shall in any way limit rights or remedies which are otherwise available
under law to the attorney general or any other person authorized to
bring an action under this section.
§ 2. This act shall take effect immediately.