| Date of Action |
Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2025 |
approval memo.49 signed chap.668 |
| Dec 08, 2025 |
delivered to governor |
| Jun 16, 2025 |
returned to senate passed assembly ordered to third reading rules cal.409 substituted for a66a |
| Jun 09, 2025 |
referred to children and families returned to assembly repassed senate |
| May 27, 2025 |
amended on third reading 550a |
| May 27, 2025 |
vote reconsidered - restored to third reading returned to senate recalled from assembly |
| May 19, 2025 |
referred to children and families delivered to assembly passed senate |
| May 15, 2025 |
advanced to third reading |
| May 14, 2025 |
2nd report cal. |
| May 13, 2025 |
1st report cal.1037 |
| Jan 21, 2025 |
reported and committed to finance |
| Jan 08, 2025 |
referred to children and families |
-
-
Floor Vote: Jun 9, 2025
aye (60)- Addabbo Jr.
- Ashby
- Bailey
- Baskin
- Borrello
- Brisport
- Brouk
- Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick
- Chan
- Cleare
- Comrie
- Cooney
- Fahy
- Fernandez
- Gallivan
- Gianaris
- Gonzalez
- Gounardes
- Griffo
- Harckham
- Helming
- Hinchey
- Hoylman-Sigal
- Jackson
- Kavanagh
- Krueger
- Lanza
- Liu
- Martins
- Mattera
- May
- Mayer
- Myrie
- O'Mara
- Oberacker
- Ortt
- Palumbo
- Parker
- Persaud
- Ramos
- Rhoads
- Rivera
- Rolison
- Ryan
- Ryan
- Salazar
- Sanders Jr.
- Scarcella-Spanton
- Sepúlveda
- Serrano
- Skoufis
- Stavisky
- Stec
- Stewart-Cousins
- Sutton
- Tedisco
- Walczyk
- Webb
- Weber
- Weik
excused (1)The following Member(s) participated via videoconferencing: Brouk
-
Removing the general public's ability to be anonymous is not the answer and cause result in the detriment of many children's lives. This bill could completely eliminate the security that many public callers have when it comes to reporting child abuse and neglect. I understand some people abuse the system, but there are protocols to trace back to those people and get legal entities involved for criminal prosecution. Instead of completely eliminating people's right to report an anonymous tip on behalf of a child's life, investment should be made on improving the criminal prosecution of those who abuse the system. The amount of people who abuse the system appears to be far less compared to those reporting anonymously in good faith. If the anonymous caller option is removed for some people, this means detrimental consequences for many children who are being abused/neglected. Some of the consequences that border the line of life and death. Many people will just not report or take action at all out of fear of being discovered and the ramification associated with that. Many people do not report now because of that fear or will only report anonymously because if they are discovered that could result in consequences including some as severe as putting their lives at risk depending on the situation and area in which they live. It can be a domestic violence victim or someone that was previously threatened with a weapon by the family they are reporting on. They could be reporting anonymously out of fear of gang violence retaliation. These examples seem extreme but are the reasonings provided by anonymous callers. The issues presented in this bill, although valid are not the norm when it comes to the amount of anonymous callers that come through the system. The majority are valid and are an act of good faith. I have heard many stories of those anonymous callers not wanting to risk their own safety to potentially save the life of a child because of the risk to their own lives, which is very understandable. People can risk their jobs, livelihood and safety to report anonymously on behalf of a child. There can be very serious ramifications of outwardly denying someone the ability to make a report anonymously. Now for an alternative solution, if the state wants to minimize abuse of the system and enhance the way investigations pan out, the best route is not to strong arm people but rather reform what we already have in place. Enhancing the legal protocols and tracing for false child abuse reporting's, being harder and more consistent with those penalties for those specific people. For two, if you want to minimize anonymous callers but still be able to access those abuse/neglected children so they are not ignored, it would be best to develop another social services hotline where people can give anonymous tips or have the State Central Registry do a warm transfer/direct referral to Law Enforcement. It will then go to law enforcement to conduct a mandatory child welfare check. Law Enforcement can then circle back to the State Central Registry with filing a mandated report if any abuse/neglect is discovered during the welfare check. This will help ensure no gaps for these children. Also, the state should enforce more penalty when it comes to mandated reporters not actually reporting. So, when mandated reporters get information of child abuse/neglect and fail to report that then leaves a child's only option as either a concerned citizen reporting or someone who knows them personally reporting (i.e. most of the anonymous callers). I agree with the confidentiality component for those who do report and leave their information. Any intentional disclosure of a source reporting child abuse/neglect should not be tolerated and there should be legal consequences to follow to minimize those occurrences.