S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
7491--A
Cal. No. 1207
2025-2026 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
April 17, 2025
___________
Introduced by Sen. BRISPORT -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Judiciary -- reported
favorably from said committee, ordered to first and second report,
ordered to a third reading, amended and ordered reprinted, retaining
its place in the order of third reading
AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to the
statute of limitations for civil actions related to certain deed theft
actions, reviving such actions otherwise barred by the existing stat-
ute of limitations and granting trial preference to such actions; and
to amend the judiciary law, in relation to directing the chief admin-
istrator of the courts to promulgate rules for the timely adjudication
of certain revived actions
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The civil practice law and rules is amended by adding a new
section 214-k to read as follows:
§ 214-K. CERTAIN DEED THEFT ACTIONS. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY PROVISION OF
LAW WHICH IMPOSES A PERIOD OF LIMITATION TO THE CONTRARY, EVERY CIVIL
CLAIM OR CAUSE OF ACTION BROUGHT AGAINST ANY PARTY ALLEGING FRAUD, FRAU-
DULENT INDUCEMENT, OR FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION IN OBTAINING THE
TITLE TO A RESIDENTIAL DWELLING, EVERY CIVIL CLAIM OR CAUSE OF ACTION
ALLEGING A VIOLATION OF SECTION THREE HUNDRED FORTY-NINE OF THE GENERAL
BUSINESS LAW OR SECTION TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE-A OF THE REAL PROPERTY
LAW THAT ARISE FROM FRAUD, FRAUDULENT INDUCEMENT, OR FRAUDULENT MISREP-
RESENTATION IN OBTAINING THE TITLE TO A RESIDENTIAL DWELLING, AND EVERY
CIVIL CLAIM OR CAUSE OF ACTION FOR LEGAL MALPRACTICE RELATED TO SUCH
ALLEGATIONS, WHICH IS BARRED AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION
BECAUSE THE APPLICABLE PERIOD OF LIMITATION HAS EXPIRED, IS HEREBY
REVIVED, AND ACTION THEREON MAY BE COMMENCED NOT EARLIER THAN SIX MONTHS
AFTER, AND NOT LATER THAN ONE YEAR AND SIX MONTHS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE
DATE OF THIS SECTION. IN ANY SUCH CLAIM OR ACTION, DISMISSAL OF A PREVI-
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD11599-02-5
S. 7491--A 2
OUS ACTION ORDERED BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION ON GROUNDS
THAT SUCH PREVIOUS ACTION WAS TIME BARRED, OR DISMISSAL OF SUCH PREVIOUS
ACTION PURSUANT TO RULE THIRTY-TWO HUNDRED SIXTEEN OF THIS CHAPTER FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, SHALL NOT BE GROUNDS FOR DISMISSAL OF A REVIVAL
ACTION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION.
§ 2. Paragraph 7 of subdivision (a) of rule 3403 of the civil practice
law and rules, as amended by chapter 203 of the laws of 2022, is amended
to read as follows:
7. any action which has been revived pursuant to section two hundred
fourteen-g [or], two hundred fourteen-j, OR TWO HUNDRED FOURTEEN-K of
this chapter.
§ 3. The judiciary law is amended by adding a new section 219-f to
read as follows:
§ 219-F. RULES REVIVING CERTAIN ACTIONS; DEED THEFT. THE CHIEF ADMIN-
ISTRATOR OF THE COURTS SHALL PROMULGATE RULES FOR THE TIMELY ADJUDI-
CATION OF REVIVED ACTIONS BROUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION TWO HUNDRED FOUR-
TEEN-K OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES.
§ 4. The provisions of this act shall be severable, and if any clause,
sentence, paragraph, subdivision or part of this act shall be adjudged
by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment
shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall
be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, subdi-
vision or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which
such judgment shall have been rendered.
§ 5. This act shall take effect immediately; provided, however, that
section three of this act shall take effect three months after this act
shall have become a law.