S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
9433--A
I N S E N A T E
March 12, 2026
___________
Introduced by Sen. PARKER -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Energy and Telecommuni-
cations -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as
amended and recommitted to said committee
AN ACT to amend the public service law, in relation to requiring gas and
electric corporations to disclose certain information with an applica-
tion for a major rate change
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subdivision 12 of section 66 of the public service law is
amended by adding two new paragraphs (n) and (o) to read as follows:
(N) THE COMMISSION SHALL REQUIRE EACH APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR CHANGE
IN RATES FILED BY A GAS CORPORATION, AN ELECTRIC CORPORATION, OR A
COMBINATION GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION, TO INCLUDE A PAST PERFORMANCE
DISCLOSURE WHICH SHALL INCLUDE:
(I) DETAILED INFORMATION ON ALL DIVIDENDS PAID TO SHAREHOLDERS IN THE
PREVIOUS TEN YEARS, INCLUDING AN EXPLANATION OF THE TOTAL DIVIDENDS PAID
AND THE DATE SUCH PAYMENTS WERE MADE;
(II) CAPITAL INVESTMENTS WHICH THE APPLICANT INDICATED IT WOULD MAKE
IN MAJOR CHANGE IN RATE FILINGS IN THE PREVIOUS TEN YEARS, AND CAPITAL
INVESTMENTS ACTUALLY MADE DURING SUCH TIME, INCLUDING AN EXPLANATION OF
WHY ANY PLANNED CAPITAL INVESTMENTS WERE NOT MADE OR WERE ABANDONED, AND
WHY ANY UNPLANNED CAPITAL INVESTMENTS WERE MADE;
(III) OPERATING EXPENSES FOR THE PREVIOUS TEN YEARS, INCLUDING EXPLA-
NATIONS FOR ANY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE ESTIMATED OPERATING EXPENSES IN
A MAJOR CHANGE IN RATE FILING AND ACTUAL OPERATING EXPENSES; AND
(IV) DETAILS OF PROGRAMMATIC AND POLICY EXPENDITURES, INCLUDING
REQUIRED STATE PROGRAMS, ANY INCOME-BASED ASSISTANCE PROGRAM IDENTIFIED
BY THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, CUSTOMER SERVICE INITIATIVES, AND ALL
RELATED CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FOR THE PREVIOUS TEN YEARS, INCLUDING
EXPLANATIONS FOR ANY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE ESTIMATED PROGRAMMATIC AND
POLICY EXPENSES IN A MAJOR CHANGE IN RATE FILING AND ACTUAL PROGRAMMATIC
AND POLICY EXPENSES. THE APPLICANT SHALL ASSEMBLE SUCH PROGRAMMATIC AND
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD15111-03-6
S. 9433--A 2
POLICY EXPENDITURES IN A SEPARATE AND DISTINCT PART OF THE FILING IN A
STANDARDIZED FORMAT PRESCRIBED BY THE COMMISSION.
(O) (I) THE COMMISSION SHALL REQUIRE EACH APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR
CHANGE IN RATES FILED BY A GAS CORPORATION, ELECTRIC CORPORATION, OR A
COMBINATION GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION, TO INCLUDE, IN ADDITION TO ANY
OTHER PROPOSAL, AN INFLATION-INDEXED PROPOSAL THAT SEPARATELY ITEMIZES
DIVIDENDS, OPERATING EXPENSES, CAPITAL EXPENDITURES, PROGRAMMATIC AND
POLICY EXPENDITURES, COMMODITY SUPPLY COSTS, AND OTHER COSTS NOT WITHIN
CONTROL OF THE APPLICANT. SUCH INFLATION-INDEXED PROPOSAL SHALL NOT
INCREASE THE APPLICANT'S AGGREGATE REVENUES BY MORE THAN THE AVERAGE
ANNUAL CONSUMER PRICE INDEX OVER THE PRIOR THREE YEARS. IN ADDITION TO
PAST DIVIDEND INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF PARAGRAPH (N)
OF THIS SUBDIVISION, APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A DIVIDEND FORECAST
COVERING THE REQUESTED RATE PERIOD.
(II) THE COMMISSION SHALL CONSIDER ONLY THE INFLATION-INDEXED PROPOSAL
AND SHALL NOT APPROVE AN INCREASE IN THE APPLICANT'S AGGREGATE REVENUES
BY MORE THAN THE INCREASE SET FORTH IN THE INFLATION-INDEXED PROPOSAL
ABSENT A DEMONSTRATION THAT THE APPLICANT IS UNABLE TO MAINTAIN THE SAME
LEVEL OF OPERATING EXPENSES, CAPITAL EXPENDITURES, AND PROGRAMMATIC OR
POLICY EXPENDITURES WITHOUT JEOPARDIZING SAFETY, RELIABILITY, ENERGY
AFFORDABILITY PROGRAMS, ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS, OR COST-EFFECTIVE
ELECTRIFICATION UPGRADES. IF THE COMMISSION FINDS THAT THE APPLICANT HAS
MADE SUCH A DEMONSTRATION, THE COMMISSION MUST PROVIDE A DETAILED EXPLA-
NATION AS TO WHY AN INCREASE OF MORE THAN THE INFLATION-INDEXED PROPOSAL
WAS NECESSARY IN ITS ORDER ADOPTING THE INCREASE. THE COMMISSION, IN
MAKING ITS DETERMINATIONS, SHALL CONSIDER THE DISCLOSURES REQUIRED UNDER
PARAGRAPH (N) OF THIS SUBDIVISION WHEN EVALUATING THE RATE CASE FILING,
WHETHER SUCH PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IS COMPARABLE TO INFORMATION
SUBMITTED IN THE APPLICATION, AND WHETHER SUCH PERFORMANCE INDICATES A
PATTERN OF DEVIATION FROM THE INVESTMENTS, EXPENSES, AND OTHER SPENDING
REPRESENTED TO THE COMMISSION BY THE APPLICANT IN PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS
FOR MAJOR CHANGES.
(III) IF THE DISCLOSURES REQUIRED BY SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF PARAGRAPH (N)
OF THIS SUBDIVISION SHOW THAT DIVIDENDS WERE INCREASED WITHIN THE PREVI-
OUS FOUR YEARS PRIOR TO THE CURRENT APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT MUST
ADDITIONALLY SUBMIT WITH ITS APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR CHANGE A DETAILED
EXPLANATION OF THE REASONS DIVIDENDS WERE INCREASED AND WHETHER THE
APPLICANT COULD HAVE PRESERVED SAFETY, RELIABILITY, ENERGY AFFORDABILITY
PROGRAMS, ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS, AND COST-EFFECTIVE ELECTRIFICATION
UPGRADE PROGRAMS WHILE MAINTAINING PRIOR DIVIDEND AMOUNTS. THE COMMIS-
SION SHALL MAKE A FINDING OF WHETHER THE AMOUNT OF SUCH DIVIDEND
INCREASE WAS IN EXCESS OF WHAT IS THE MINIMUM AMOUNT NECESSARY TO
EVIDENCE THAT THE APPLICANT EARNED A JUST AND REASONABLE RATE OF RETURN
DURING SUCH TIME PERIOD. IF THE COMMISSION MAKES A FINDING THAT SUCH
DIVIDEND INCREASE WAS IN EXCESS OF SUCH MINIMUM AMOUNT AND THAT SUCH
APPLICANT CONTINUES TO BE IN A STABLE FINANCIAL POSITION WHICH IS
SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO OR BETTER THAN THE FINANCIAL POSITION OF SUCH
APPLICANT AT THE TIME WHEN THE DIVIDEND INCREASE WAS MADE, THERE SHALL
BE A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION THAT THE APPLICANT IS ABLE TO MAINTAIN THE
SAME LEVEL OF OPERATING EXPENSES, CAPITAL EXPENDITURES, PROGRAMMATIC OR
POLICY EXPENDITURES WITHOUT JEOPARDIZING SAFETY, RELIABILITY, ENERGY
AFFORDABILITY PROGRAMS, ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS, AND COST-EFFECTIVE
ELECTRIFICATION UPGRADES WITHOUT AN INCREASE IN EXCESS OF THE INFLA-
TION-INDEXED PROPOSAL. SUCH REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION MAY ONLY BE REBUTTED
BY DEMONSTRATING BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE THAT THE INFLATION-
LINKED PROPOSAL WOULD, AFTER ACCOUNTING FOR A REDUCTION IN DIVIDENDS
S. 9433--A 3
EQUIVALENT TO SUCH PRIOR DIVIDEND INCREASE, JEOPARDIZE SAFETY, RELIABIL-
ITY, ENERGY AFFORDABILITY PROGRAMS, ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS, OR COST-
EFFECTIVE ELECTRIFICATION UPGRADES.
(IV) NOTHING IN THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO PREVENT THE
COMMISSION FROM APPROVING A RATE INCREASE IN AN AMOUNT LESS THAN THE
INFLATION-INDEXED PROPOSAL.
§ 2. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall
have become a law and shall apply to all applications for major changes
in rates filed on and after such date.